Literature DB >> 18766410

Reinterventions for specific technique-related complications of stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH): a critical appraisal.

Pierpaolo Sileri1, Vito Maria Stolfi, Luana Franceschilli, Federico Perrone, Lodovico Patrizi, Achille Lucio Gaspari.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH) is an attractive alternative to conventional haemorrhoidectomy (CH) because of reduced pain and earlier return to normal activities. However, complication rates are as high as 31%. Although some complications are similar to CH, most are specifically technique-related. In this prospective audit, we report our experience with the management of some of these complications.
METHODS: Data on patients undergoing SH at our unit or referred to us are prospectively entered in a database. The onset or duration of specific SH-related complications as well as reinterventions for failed or complicated SH was recorded.
RESULTS: From 1/03 to 10/07, 110 patients underwent SH, while 17 patients were referred after complicated/failed SH. Overall early and late complication rates after SH were 12.7% and 27.2%, respectively. Overall reintervention rate was 9.1%. Among the referred SH-group, one patient underwent Hartmann's procedure because of rectal perforation. The remaining 16 patients experienced at least one of the following: recurrence, urgency, frequency, severe persistent anal pain, colicky abdominal pain, anal fissure and stenosis. Four patients underwent CH with regular postoperative recovery. Two patients underwent exploration under anaesthesia because of persisting pain. One patient underwent anoplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: SH presents unusual and challenging complications. Abuses should be minimized and longer-term studies are needed to further clarify its role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18766410     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0670-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  30 in total

1.  Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Y H Ho; F Seow-Choen; C Tsang; K W Eu
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Rectal perforation, retropneumoperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids: report of a case and subsequent considerations.

Authors:  Valter Ripetti; Marco Caricato; Augusto Arullani
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy followed by fecal urgency and tenesmus: methodological complication or surgeon's mistake?

Authors:  V Filingeri; G Gravante
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Histopathology of stapled haemorrhoidectomy specimens: a cautionary note.

Authors:  B D George; D Shetty; I Lindsey; N J Mc C Mortensen; B F Warren
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Complications and 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Giovanni Angelone; Cristiano Giardiello; Carmine Prota
Journal:  Chir Ital       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

6.  Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Rowsell; M Bello; D M Hemingway
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Postdefaecation pain syndrome after circular stapled anopexy is abolished by oral nifedipine.

Authors:  M A Thaha; L A Irvine; R J C Steele; K L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M J Cheetham; N J Mortensen; P O Nystrom; M A Kamm; R K Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a prospective study from pathology to clinical outcome.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Sileri; Vito Maria Stolfi; Giampiero Palmieri; Alessandra Mele; Alessandro Falchetti; Sara Di Carlo; Achille Lucio Gaspari
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Complications and results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy as a day surgical procedure.

Authors:  B Mlakar; P Kosorok
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.781

View more
  3 in total

1.  Persistent anal and pelvic floor pain after PPH and STARR: surgical management of the fixed scar staple line.

Authors:  Claudia Menconi; Bernardina Fabiani; Iacopo Giani; Jacopo Martellucci; Gianluca Toniolo; Gabriele Naldini
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Surgical treatment of anal stenosis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Brisinda; Serafino Vanella; Federica Cadeddu; Gaia Marniga; Pasquale Mazzeo; Francesco Brandara; Giorgio Maria
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoidal disease with PPH or THD. A randomized trial on postoperative complications and short-term results.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Festen; M J van Hoogstraten; A A W van Geloven; M F Gerhards
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.571

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.