Literature DB >> 17917785

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a prospective study from pathology to clinical outcome.

Pierpaolo Sileri1, Vito Maria Stolfi, Giampiero Palmieri, Alessandra Mele, Alessandro Falchetti, Sara Di Carlo, Achille Lucio Gaspari.   

Abstract

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is widely accepted to treat hemorrhoids, but serious complications have been reported. In this prospective audit, we correlated clinical outcome with pathological findings. From January 2003 to April 2007, 94 patients underwent hemorrhoidopexy. Macroscopic appearance of the specimen (shape, size, and depth) was recorded. Microscopically, the presence of columnar, transitional, and squamous epithelium, the involvement of circular/longitudinal smooth muscle, and features of mucosal prolapse were assessed. Clinical outcome was evaluated by a validated questionnaire. Postoperative pain, secretion, and bleeding durations were 12.7+/-10.6, 5.6+/-9.6, and 6.3+/-8.4 days. Patient's return to work averaged 16.7+/-10.7 days. Fissure, skin tags, and anal strictures were observed in 23.4%. Seven patients experienced pain for a significantly longer period of time. All specimens contained columnar mucosa, but 29.8% contained columnar and transitional epithelium and 12.8% contained columnar, anal transitional, and stratified squamous epithelium. Smooth muscle was observed in 62.7%. Pain was significantly increased if transitional epithelium was present in the specimen. No correlation or differences were observed if smooth muscle was present, although postoperative bleeding was more frequent. Hemorrhoidopexy is safe and effective. The specimen should always be sent for pathology examination. Only columnar epithelium should be present and, although the presence of smooth muscle does not influence the outcome in terms of functional results, its presence may play a role in postoperative bleeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17917785     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0328-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  22 in total

1.  Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Y H Ho; F Seow-Choen; C Tsang; K W Eu
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy followed by fecal urgency and tenesmus: methodological complication or surgeon's mistake?

Authors:  V Filingeri; G Gravante
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Histopathology of stapled haemorrhoidectomy specimens: a cautionary note.

Authors:  B D George; D Shetty; I Lindsey; N J Mc C Mortensen; B F Warren
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up.

Authors:  M J Cheetham; C R G Cohen; M A Kamm; R K S Phillips
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Rowsell; M Bello; D M Hemingway
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  R Shalaby; A Desoky
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M J Cheetham; N J Mortensen; P O Nystrom; M A Kamm; R K Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Stapled haemorrhoidectomy compared with Milligan-Morgan excision for the treatment of prolapsing haemorrhoids: a prospective study.

Authors:  I Goulimaris; I Kanellos; E Christoforidis; I Mantzoros; Ch Odisseos; D Betsis
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2002

9.  Day case stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids.

Authors:  G C Beattie; T K McAdam; S A McIntosh; M A Loudon
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Complications and results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy as a day surgical procedure.

Authors:  B Mlakar; P Kosorok
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.781

View more
  4 in total

1.  Is simple mucosal resection really possible? Considerations about histological findings after stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Gabriele Naldini; Jacopo Martellucci; Luca Moraldi; Nicola Romano; Mauro Rossi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Reinterventions for specific technique-related complications of stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH): a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Sileri; Vito Maria Stolfi; Luana Franceschilli; Federico Perrone; Lodovico Patrizi; Achille Lucio Gaspari
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Correlation of histopathology with anorectal manometry following stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Young Ki Hong; Yoon Jung Choi; Jung Gu Kang
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2013-10-31

4.  Stapled mucosectomy: an alternative technique for the removal of retained rectal mucosa after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Metin Ertem; Volkan Ozben
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 4.519

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.