Literature DB >> 18766097

Nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the intensive care unit: an evidence-based review.

Ruth M Kleinpell1, E Wesley Ely, Robert Grabenkort.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advanced practitioners including nurse practitioners and physician assistants are contributing to care for critically ill patients in the intensive care unit through their participation on the multidisciplinary team and in collaborative physician practice roles. However, the impact of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the intensive care unit setting is not well known.
OBJECTIVES: To identify published literature on the role of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in acute and critical care settings; to review the literature using nonquantitative methods and provide a summary of the results to date incorporating studies assessing the impact and outcomes of nurse practitioner and physician assistant providers in the intensive care unit; and to identify implications for critical care practice.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of the English-language literature of publications on nurse practitioners and physician assistants utilizing Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases from 1996 through August 2007.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
RESULTS: Over 145 articles were reviewed on the role of the nurse practitioner and physician assistant in acute and critical care settings. A total of 31 research studies focused on the role and impact of these practitioners in the care of acute and critically ill patients. Of those, 20 were focused on nurse practitioner care, six focused on both nurse practitioner and physician assistant care, and five were focused on physician assistant care in acute and critical care settings. Fourteen focused on intensive care unit care, and 17 focused on acute care including emergency room, trauma, and management of patients with specific acute care conditions such as stroke, pneumonia, and congestive heart failure. Most studies used retrospective or prospective study designs and nonprobability sampling techniques. Only two randomized control trials were identified. The majority examined the impact of care on patient care management (n = 17), six focused on comparisons of care with physician care, five examined the impact of models of care including multidisciplinary and outcomes management models, and three assessed involvement and impact on reinforcement of practice guidelines, education, research, and quality improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Although existing research supports the use of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in acute and critical care settings, a low level of evidence was found with only two randomized control trials assessing the impact of nurse practitioner care. Further research that explores the impact of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the intensive care unit setting on patient outcomes, including financial aspects of care is needed. In addition, information on successful multidisciplinary models of care is needed to promote optimal use of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in acute and critical care settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18766097     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186ba8c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  34 in total

1.  Outcomes of Nurse Practitioner-Delivered Critical Care: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Janna S Landsperger; Matthew W Semler; Li Wang; Daniel W Byrne; Arthur P Wheeler
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  The Simulation-Based Assessment of Pediatric Rapid Response Teams.

Authors:  James J Fehr; Mary E McBride; John R Boulet; David J Murray
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 3.  Is 24/7 In-House Intensivist Staffing Necessary in the Intensive Care Unit?

Authors:  Faisal Masud; Tina Yaqing Cai Lam; Sahar Fatima
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

4.  Is There an ICU Doctor in the House?

Authors:  David J Wallace
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Training internists to meet critical care needs in the United States: a consensus statement from the Critical Care Societies Collaborative (CCSC).

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  The association of hospital characteristics and quality improvement activities in inpatient medical services.

Authors:  Joseph D Restuccia; David Mohr; Mark Meterko; Kelly Stolzmann; Peter Kaboli
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Geographic Distribution of Nonphysician Clinicians Who Independently Billed Medicare for Common Dermatologic Services in 2014.

Authors:  Adewole S Adamson; Elizabeth A Suarez; Philip McDaniel; Paul A Leiphart; Alana Zeitany; Joslyn S Kirby
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 10.282

8.  Comparing the information seeking strategies of residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants in critical care settings.

Authors:  Thomas G Kannampallil; Laura K Jones; Vimla L Patel; Timothy G Buchman; Amy Franklin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  The Impact of Enhanced Critical Care Training and 24/7 (Tele-ICU) Support on Medicare Spending and Postdischarge Utilization Patterns.

Authors:  Matthew J Trombley; Andrea Hassol; Jennifer T Lloyd; Timothy G Buchman; Allison F Marier; Alan White; Erin Colligan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  Staffing and workforce issues in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Derek S Wheeler; Maya Dewan; Andrea Maxwell; Carley L Riley; Erika L Stalets
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.