OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between treatment for diabetes and Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathology. METHODS: This postmortem study matched 124 subjects with diabetes to 124 without diabetes from the Mount Sinai School of Medicine Brain Bank, on age (mean = 81.2 + 9.3), sex (57.3% F), and severity of dementia (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] 2.4 + 1.7). Densities of neuritic plaques (NPs) and of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) were assessed in several neocortical regions and in the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and amygdala. Diabetic subjects were classified according to their recorded lifetime antidiabetic medications: none (n = 29), insulin only (n = 49), diabetes medications other than insulin only (n = 28), or concomitant use of both insulin and any oral antidiabetic medications (n = 18). For each dependent variable, analysis of covariance controlling for age at death, sex, and CDR distinguished among the nondiabetic patients and four diabetic subgroups. RESULTS: There were differences among the five groups for NP ratings in the entorhinal cortex (p = 0.003), amygdala (p = 0.009), and overall NP (p = 0.014) as well as counts of NPs in all regions examined (p values ranging from 0.009 to 0.04). NP ratings in the hippocampus (p = 0.057) and the combined neocortical measure (p = 0.052) approached significance. In each analysis, the concomitant medication group had significantly fewer NPs (approximately 20%) than any of the other groups, which were relatively similar. No significant NFT differences were found. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the combination of insulin with other diabetes medication is associated with substantially lower neuritic plaque density consistent with the effects of both on the neurobiology of insulin.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between treatment for diabetes and Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathology. METHODS: This postmortem study matched 124 subjects with diabetes to 124 without diabetes from the Mount Sinai School of Medicine Brain Bank, on age (mean = 81.2 + 9.3), sex (57.3% F), and severity of dementia (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] 2.4 + 1.7). Densities of neuritic plaques (NPs) and of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) were assessed in several neocortical regions and in the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and amygdala. Diabetic subjects were classified according to their recorded lifetime antidiabetic medications: none (n = 29), insulin only (n = 49), diabetes medications other than insulin only (n = 28), or concomitant use of both insulin and any oral antidiabetic medications (n = 18). For each dependent variable, analysis of covariance controlling for age at death, sex, and CDR distinguished among the nondiabetic patients and four diabetic subgroups. RESULTS: There were differences among the five groups for NP ratings in the entorhinal cortex (p = 0.003), amygdala (p = 0.009), and overall NP (p = 0.014) as well as counts of NPs in all regions examined (p values ranging from 0.009 to 0.04). NP ratings in the hippocampus (p = 0.057) and the combined neocortical measure (p = 0.052) approached significance. In each analysis, the concomitant medication group had significantly fewer NPs (approximately 20%) than any of the other groups, which were relatively similar. No significant NFT differences were found. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the combination of insulin with other diabetes medication is associated with substantially lower neuritic plaque density consistent with the effects of both on the neurobiology of insulin.
Authors: Linda B Hassing; Boo Johansson; Sven E Nilsson; Stig Berg; Nancy L Pedersen; Margaret Gatz; Gerald McClearn Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Ling Xie; Erik Helmerhorst; Kevin Taddei; Brian Plewright; Wilhelm Van Bronswijk; Ralph Martins Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2002-05-10 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: J Kyle Krady; Anirban Basu; Colleen M Allen; Yuping Xu; Kathryn F LaNoue; Thomas W Gardner; Steven W Levison Journal: Diabetes Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: G Lesser; K Kandiah; L S Libow; A Likourezos; B Breuer; D Marin; R Mohs; V Haroutunian; R Neufeld Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2001 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Suzanne Craft; Sanjay Asthana; David G Cook; Laura D Baker; Monique Cherrier; Kristina Purganan; Colby Wait; Andreana Petrova; Shawn Latendresse; G Stennis Watson; John W Newcomer; Gerard D Schellenberg; Aaron J Krohn Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Juliette Janson; Thomas Laedtke; Joseph E Parisi; Peter O'Brien; Ronald C Petersen; Peter C Butler Journal: Diabetes Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Jasmanda H Wu; Mary N Haan; Jersey Liang; Debashis Ghosh; Hector M Gonzalez; William H Herman Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Michal Schnaider Beeri; Erin Moshier; James Schmeidler; James Godbold; Jaime Uribarri; Sarah Reddy; Mary Sano; Hillel T Grossman; Weijing Cai; Helen Vlassara; Jeremy M Silverman Journal: Mech Ageing Dev Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 5.432
Authors: Joanne S Allard; Evelyn J Perez; Koji Fukui; Priscilla Carpenter; Donald K Ingram; Rafael de Cabo Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Katherine J Bangen; Jayandra J Himali; Alexa S Beiser; Daniel A Nation; David J Libon; Caroline S Fox; Sudha Seshadri; Philip A Wolf; Ann C McKee; Rhoda Au; Lisa Delano-Wood Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Kai Long Zhong; Fang Chen; Hao Hong; Xuan Ke; Yang Ge Lv; Su Su Tang; Yu Bing Zhu Journal: Metab Brain Dis Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 3.584
Authors: Jennifer Huang; James Schmeidler; Michal S Beeri; Clive Rosendorff; Simmi Bhatia; Rebecca K West; Irina N Bespalova; Rizalina Mavris; Jeremy M Silverman Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2011-09-18 Impact factor: 10.668