Literature DB >> 18765343

A simple and general explanation for the evolution of altruism.

Jeffrey A Fletcher1, Michael Doebeli.   

Abstract

We present a simple framework that highlights the most fundamental requirement for the evolution of altruism: assortment between individuals carrying the cooperative genotype and the helping behaviours of others with which these individuals interact. We partition the fitness effects on individuals into those due to self and those due to the 'interaction environment', and show that it is the latter that is most fundamental to understanding the evolution of altruism. We illustrate that while kinship or genetic similarity among those interacting may generate a favourable structure of interaction environments, it is not a fundamental requirement for the evolution of altruism, and even suicidal aid can theoretically evolve without help ever being exchanged among genetically similar individuals. Using our simple framework, we also clarify a common confusion made in the literature between alternative fitness accounting methods (which may equally apply to the same biological circumstances) and unique causal mechanisms for creating the assortment necessary for altruism to be favoured by natural selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18765343      PMCID: PMC2614248          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  24 in total

1.  Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game.

Authors:  Christoph Hauert; Michael Doebeli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Five rules for the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  What is wrong with absolute individual fitness?

Authors:  David Sloan Wilson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  The evolution of cooperation and altruism--a general framework and a classification of models.

Authors:  L Lehmann; L Keller
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  What's wrong with inclusive fitness?

Authors:  Jeffrey A Fletcher; Martin Zwick; Michael Doebeli; David Sloan Wilson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 6.  Evolutionary explanations for cooperation.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Ashleigh S Griffin; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  The evolution of interspecific mutualisms.

Authors:  M Doebeli; N Knowlton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  R Axelrod; W D Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 10.  Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection.

Authors:  S A West; A S Griffin; A Gardner
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.411

View more
  103 in total

1.  Direct reciprocity in structured populations.

Authors:  Matthijs van Veelen; Julián García; David G Rand; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Response of dorsomedial prefrontal cortex predicts altruistic behavior.

Authors:  Adam Waytz; Jamil Zaki; Jason P Mitchell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Individual variation behind the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Zoltán Barta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Negotiation and appeasement can be more effective drivers of sociality than kin selection.

Authors:  Andrés E Quiñones; G Sander van Doorn; Ido Pen; Franz J Weissing; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Models of social evolution: can we do better to predict 'who helps whom to achieve what'?

Authors:  António M M Rodrigues; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Privatization of cooperative benefits stabilizes mutualistic cross-feeding interactions in spatially structured environments.

Authors:  Samay Pande; Filip Kaftan; Stefan Lang; Aleš Svatoš; Sebastian Germerodt; Christian Kost
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 10.302

7.  Antibiotic stress selects against cooperation in the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Marie Vasse; Robert J Noble; Andrei R Akhmetzhanov; Clara Torres-Barceló; James Gurney; Simon Benateau; Claire Gougat-Barbera; Oliver Kaltz; Michael E Hochberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Assortment, Hamilton's rule and multilevel selection.

Authors:  P Bijma; D K Aanen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Evolution of restraint in a structured rock-paper-scissors community.

Authors:  Joshua R Nahum; Brittany N Harding; Benjamin Kerr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Expanded social fitness and Hamilton's rule for kin, kith, and kind.

Authors:  David C Queller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.