Literature DB >> 18764006

Maximum likelihood: extracting unbiased information from complex networks.

Diego Garlaschelli1, Maria I Loffredo.   

Abstract

The choice of free parameters in network models is subjective, since it depends on what topological properties are being monitored. However, we show that the maximum likelihood (ML) principle indicates a unique, statistically rigorous parameter choice, associated with a well-defined topological feature. We then find that, if the ML condition is incompatible with the built-in parameter choice, network models turn out to be intrinsically ill defined or biased. To overcome this problem, we construct a class of safely unbiased models. We also propose an extension of these results that leads to the fascinating possibility to extract, only from topological data, the "hidden variables" underlying network organization, making them "no longer hidden." We test our method on World Trade Web data, where we recover the empirical gross domestic product using only topological information.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18764006     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.015101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys        ISSN: 1539-3755


  10 in total

1.  Sparse Power-Law Network Model for Reliable Statistical Predictions Based on Sampled Data.

Authors:  Alexander P Kartun-Giles; Dmitri Krioukov; James P Gleeson; Yamir Moreno; Ginestra Bianconi
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 2.524

2.  Randomizing bipartite networks: the case of the World Trade Web.

Authors:  Fabio Saracco; Riccardo Di Clemente; Andrea Gabrielli; Tiziano Squartini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Multiplexity versus correlation: the role of local constraints in real multiplexes.

Authors:  V Gemmetto; D Garlaschelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Colombian Export Capabilities: Building the Firms-Products Network.

Authors:  Matteo Bruno; Fabio Saracco; Tiziano Squartini; Marco Dueñas
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.524

5.  Network comparison and the within-ensemble graph distance.

Authors:  Harrison Hartle; Brennan Klein; Stefan McCabe; Alexander Daniels; Guillaume St-Onge; Charles Murphy; Laurent Hébert-Dufresne
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.704

6.  Brexit and bots: characterizing the behaviour of automated accounts on Twitter during the UK election.

Authors:  Matteo Bruno; Renaud Lambiotte; Fabio Saracco
Journal:  EPJ Data Sci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Reconstructing firm-level interactions in the Dutch input-output network from production constraints.

Authors:  Leonardo Niccolò Ialongo; Camille de Valk; Emiliano Marchese; Fabian Jansen; Hicham Zmarrou; Tiziano Squartini; Diego Garlaschelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Bow-tie structures of twitter discursive communities.

Authors:  Mattia Mattei; Manuel Pratelli; Guido Caldarelli; Marinella Petrocchi; Fabio Saracco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Maximum entropy networks for large scale social network node analysis.

Authors:  Bart De Clerck; Luis E C Rocha; Filip Van Utterbeeck
Journal:  Appl Netw Sci       Date:  2022-09-28

10.  Flow of online misinformation during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.

Authors:  Guido Caldarelli; Rocco De Nicola; Marinella Petrocchi; Manuel Pratelli; Fabio Saracco
Journal:  EPJ Data Sci       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.184

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.