Literature DB >> 18762911

Comparison of the bioabsorbable and metal screw fixation after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring autograft in MRI and clinical outcome: a prospective randomized study.

Anna-Stina Moisala1, Timo Järvelä, Antti Paakkala, Timo Paakkala, Pekka Kannus, Markku Järvinen.   

Abstract

There has never been an MRI study of tunnel widening comparing bioabsorbable to metal screw fixation in autologous hamstring anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We randomized 62 patients to hamstring ACL reconstruction with either a bioabsorbable (n=31) or metal screw (n=31) fixation. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, KT-1000 arthrometric measurement, the International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores, and MRI. There were no differences between the groups preoperatively. Fifty-five patients (89%) were available at a minimum of 2-year follow-up (range 24-36 months). There was tunnel widening in both groups, but the increase was significantly greater in the AP dimension of the femoral tunnel in the bioabsorbable screw group compared to metal group (P=0.01). The tibial tunnels showed no intergroup difference. Ninety-four percent of the knees were normal or nearly normal according to the IKDC scores and the average Lysholm score was 91 with no intergroup difference. The follow-up AP tibial tunnel diameter was smaller with normal knee laxity compared to abnormal knee laxity. The graft failure rate in the bioabsorbable screw group was 23% (7/31 patients) and 6% (2/31 patients) in the metal screw group. The use of bioabsorbable screws resulted in more femoral tunnel widening, and more graft failures compared to metal screws. The tunnel widening in the tibia was associated with the knee laxity (P=0.02).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18762911     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0593-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  18 in total

1.  A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Leo A Pinczewski; David J Deehan; Lucy J Salmon; Vivianne J Russell; Amanda Clingeleffer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation.

Authors:  C Benjamin Ma; Kimberly Francis; Jeffrey Towers; Jay Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Christopher H Harner
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament surgery.

Authors:  Timothy C Wilson; Anthony Kantaras; Ahmet Atay; Darren L Johnson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Bone tunnel remodeling at the site of biodegradable interference screws used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  G Lajtai; G Schmiedhuber; F Unger; G Aitzetmüller; M Klein; I Noszian; E Orthner
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Biodegradable and metallic interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery using hamstring tendon grafts: prospective randomized study of radiographic results and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Gauti Laxdal; Jüri Kartus; Bengt I Eriksson; Eva Faxén; Ninni Sernert; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 6.  Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?

Authors:  J Höher; H D Möller; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee.

Authors:  D M Daniel; L L Malcom; G Losse; M L Stone; R Sachs; R Burks
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Serial magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of operative site after fixation of patellar tendon graft with bioabsorbable interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  G Lajtai; I Noszian; K Humer; F Unger; G Aitzetmüller; E Orthner
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 9.  Adverse tissue reactions to bioabsorbable fixation devices.

Authors:  O M Böstman; H K Pihlajamäki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Fluid collections in the osseous tunnel during the first year after anterior cruciate ligament repair using an autologous hamstring graft: natural history and clinical correlation.

Authors:  Timothy G Sanders; Michael A Tall; John P Mulloy; Henry T Leis
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  28 in total

1.  Femoral tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using RigidFix compared with extracortical fixation.

Authors:  Osmar Valadao Lopes; Leandro de Freitas Spinelli; Luiz Henrique Cunha Leite; Bruce Quatrin Buzzeto; Paulo Renato Fernades Saggin; André Kuhn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Tibial tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendons using Rigidfix femoral fixation and Intrafix tibial fixation.

Authors:  Nam-Hong Choi; Jung-Hoon Lee; Kyung-Mo Son; Brian N Victoroff
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Increased lateral tibial posterior slope is related to tibial tunnel widening after primary ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Soheil Sabzevari; Amir Ata Rahnemai-Azar; Humza S Shaikh; Justin W Arner; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnel size: causes of tunnel enlargement and implications for single versus two-stage revision reconstruction.

Authors:  Magda Rizer; Gregory Brian Foremny; Augustus Rush; Adam D Singer; Michael Baraga; Lee D Kaplan; Jean Jose
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  The efficacy of post-operative devices following knee arthroscopic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Corey T Gatewood; Andrew A Tran; Jason L Dragoo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Meta-analysis comparing bioabsorbable versus metal interference screw for adverse and clinical outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Pat Laupattarakasem; Malinee Laopaiboon; Weerachai Kosuwon; Wiroon Laupattarakasem
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Migration of "bioabsorbable" screws in ACL repair. How much do we know? A systematic review.

Authors:  Hélder Pereira; Hélder M D Pereira; Vítor M Correlo; Joana Silva-Correia; Joaquim M Oliveira; Rui L Reis; Rui L Reis Ceng; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Fixation techniques for the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: early follow-up. A systematic review of level I and II therapeutic studies.

Authors:  Andrea Speziali; Marco Delcogliano; Matteo Tei; Giacomo Placella; Matteo Bartoli; Amerigo Menghi; Giuliano Cerulli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-10-01

9.  Resorbable screw and sheath versus resorbable interference screw and staples for ACL reconstruction: a comparison of two tibial fixation methods.

Authors:  Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi; Stefano Soderi; Luigi Sirleo; Giovanni Munz; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Pedro Debieux; Carlos E S Franciozi; Mário Lenza; Marcel Jun Tamaoki; Robert A Magnussen; Flávio Faloppa; João Carlos Belloti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.