Literature DB >> 18762656

Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck.

Thomas Parker Vail1, Richard R Glisson, David E Dominguez, Kenichi Kitaoka, Danielle Ottaviano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retrieval studies have suggested that the cause of femoral implant failure after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is multifactorial. Both varus positioning of the femoral component and notching of the superior part of the femoral neck have been associated with femoral component failure. The hypotheses of this study were that placement of a femoral resurfacing component alters femoral neck loading and that the cortical strain pattern reflecting this loading is directly related to the spatial orientation of the resurfacing component. An additional hypothesis was that notching of the superior part of the neck during implantation results in a decreased resistance to neck fracture under axial loading.
METHODS: Varus, anteverted, retroverted, and anatomic positions of the femoral component were tested in sixty-four cadaveric femora. Simulated stance-phase loading was applied, and the shear strain on the femoral neck cortex was quantified with use of a photoelastic method. Preimplantation and postimplantation strain levels were compared over the entire neck region with use of generalized estimating equations. The influence of anteversion and retroversion of the component and notching of the superior part of the neck on the neck strength were evaluated.
RESULTS: Placement of the implant in 10 degrees of varus alignment relative to anatomic positioning increased strain on the superior aspect of the neck by 19% to 23% compared with intact femora. Anteverted and retroverted placement of the implant produced elevated strain in the anterior-inferior and posterior-inferior aspects of the neck, respectively. Placement of the component stem in alignment with the anatomic neck axis decreased neck cortical strain 6% to 19% compared with intact femora. Notching of the superior aspect of the neck decreased neck strength by 21%.
CONCLUSIONS: Relatively small deviations from anatomic alignment of a resurfacing hip component result in marked localized increases in loading of the femoral neck under conditions approximating single-limb stance. Neutral positioning of the femoral component results in localized strain reduction. Notching of the superior aspect of the femoral neck significantly reduces the resistance to fracture (p = 0.008).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18762656     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  14 in total

1.  [Imageless computer navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty].

Authors:  Christoph Schnurr; Jochen Nessler; Jürgen Koebke; Joern William Michael; Peer Eysel; Dietmar Pierre König
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  A simple technique for alignment in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: technical note and preliminary report.

Authors:  Manuel Villanueva-Martínez; Antonio Ríos-Luna; Angel Villamor-Pérez
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2009-06-09

3.  The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists.

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Jinjun Zhu; Peter J Brooks; C Anderson Engh; Stephen J Raterman; John S Rogerson; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Cemented total hip arthroplasty with retention of some existing hardware.

Authors:  Fernando Monteiro Judas; Joana Bento Rodrigues; Francisco Manuel Lucas; João Paulo Freitas
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-07-02

5.  A custom-made guide-wire positioning device for hip surface replacement arthroplasty: description and first results.

Authors:  Martijn Raaijmaakers; Frederik Gelaude; Karla De Smedt; Tim Clijmans; Jeroen Dille; Michiel Mulier
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  The First SICOT Oral Presentation Award 2011: imageless computer-assisted femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Maik Stiehler; Jens Goronzy; Albrecht Hartmann; Frank Krummenauer; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Bone mineral density of the femoral neck in resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeannette Østergaard Penny; Ole Ovesen; Kim Brixen; Jens-Erik Varmarken; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Are component positioning and prosthesis size associated with hip resurfacing failure?

Authors:  David R Marker; Michael G Zywiel; Aaron J Johnson; Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing with and without navigation.

Authors:  Andrea Emilio Salvi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Digital templating and preoperative deformity analysis with standard imaging software.

Authors:  Amir A Jamali
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.