Literature DB >> 18762652

Computerized tomographic morphometric analysis of subaxial cervical spine pedicles in young asymptomatic volunteers.

Raj D Rao1, Satyajit V Marawar, Brian D Stemper, Narayan Yoganandan, Barry S Shender.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although cervical spine pedicle screws have been shown to provide excellent fixation, widespread acceptance of their use is limited because of the risk of injury to the spinal cord, nerve roots, and vertebral arteries. The risks of pedicle screw insertion in the cervical spine can be mitigated by a three-dimensional appreciation of pedicle anatomy. Normative data on three-dimensional subaxial pedicle geometry from a large, young, and asymptomatic North American population are lacking. The purpose of the present study was to determine three-dimensional subaxial pedicle geometry in a large group of young volunteers and to determine level and sex-specific morphologic differences.
METHODS: Helical computerized tomography scans were made from the third cervical to the seventh cervical vertebra in ninety-eight volunteers (sixty-three men and thirty-five women) with an average age of twenty-five years. Pedicle width, height, length, and transverse and sagittal angulations were measured bilaterally. Pedicle screw insertion positions were quantified in terms of mediolateral and superoinferior offsets relative to readily identifiable landmarks.
RESULTS: The mean pedicle width and height at all subaxial levels were sufficient to accommodate 3.5-mm screws in 98% of the volunteers. Pedicle width and height dimensions of <4.0 mm were rare (observed in association with only 1.7% of the pedicles), with 82% occurring in women and 72% occurring unilaterally. Screw insertion positions generally moved medially and superiorly at caudal levels. Transverse angulation was approximately 45 degrees at the third to fifth cervical levels and was less at more caudal levels. Sagittal angulation changed from a cranial orientation at superior levels to a caudal orientation at inferior levels. Mediolateral and superoinferior insertion positions and sagittal angulations were significantly dependent (p < 0.05) on sex and spinal level. Transverse angulation was significantly dependent (p < 0.05) on spinal level.
CONCLUSIONS: Pedicle screw insertion points and orientation are significantly different (p < 0.05) at most subaxial cervical levels and between men and women. Preoperative imaging studies should be carefully templated for pedicle size in all patients on a level-specific basis. Although the prevalence was low, women were more likely to have pedicle width and height dimensions of <4.0 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18762652     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  18 in total

Review 1.  Ethnic differences in pedicle and bony spinal canal dimensions calculated from computed tomography of the cervical spine: a review of the English-language literature.

Authors:  Masaaki Chazono; Takaaki Tanaka; Yoshio Kumagae; Tomoaki Sai; Keishi Marumo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cervical pedicle screw insertion using a gutter entry point at the transitional area between the lateral mass and lamina.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Tofuku; Hiroaki Koga; Setsuro Komiya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Computed tomographic morphometric analysis of cervical pedicles in a multi-ethnic Asian population and relevance to subaxial cervical pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Thangaraj Munusamy; Ady Thien; Mark Gerad Anthony; Ramesh Bakthavachalam; Shree Kumar Dinesh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Morphometric Analysis of Sub-axial Cervical Vertebrae and Its Surgical Implications.

Authors:  Sandeep Saluja; Sachin Patil; Neelam Vasudeva
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-11-01

5.  Subaxial cervical pedicle screw insertion with newly defined entry point and trajectory: accuracy evaluation in cadavers.

Authors:  Xiujun Zheng; Rahul Chaudhari; Chunhui Wu; Amir A Mehbod; Ensor E Transfeldt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Computerized Tomography-Based Morphometric Analysis of Subaxial Cervical Spine Pedicle in Asymptomatic Indian Population.

Authors:  Kamran Farooque; Rahul Yadav; Buddhadev Chowdhury; Shivanand Gamanagatti; Atin Kumar; Pradeep Kumar Meena
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

7.  Computerized tomographic morphometric analysis of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Ds Evangelopoulos; P Kontovazenitis; S Kouris; X Zlatidou; Lm Benneker; Ja Vlamis; Ds Korres; N Efstathopoulos
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-06-29

8.  Cervical pedicle screw fixation at C6 and C7: A cadaveric study.

Authors:  Ye Li; Jingchen Liu; Yulong Liu; Yuntao Wu; Qingsan Zhu
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Morphological study of subaxial cervical pedicles by using three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction image.

Authors:  Kanthika Wasinpongwanich; Permsak Paholpak; Panya Tuamsuk; Winai Sirichativapee; Taweechok Wisanuyotin; Weerachai Kosuwon; Polasak Jeeravipoolvarn
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Morphometric evaluation of subaxial cervical spine using multi-detector computerized tomography (MD-CT) scan: the consideration for cervical pedicle screws fixation.

Authors:  Pongsthorn Chanplakorn; Chaiwat Kraiwattanapong; Kitti Aroonjarattham; Pittavat Leelapattana; Gun Keorochana; Suphaneewan Jaovisidha; Wiwat Wajanavisit
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.