Literature DB >> 18762062

Middle school students' perceptions of a peer who stutters.

David Evans1, E Charles Healey, Norimune Kawai, Susan Rowland.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Little is known about how middle school students perceive a similar-aged peer who stutters. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the influence of stuttering frequency, Likert statement type (affective, behavioral, cognitive), and the gender of the listener on middle school students' perceptions of a peer who stutters. Sixty-four middle school students (10-14 years) individually viewed a video sample of a teen telling a joke at one of four stuttering frequencies (<1%, 5%, 10%, 14%). After the students viewed one of the video samples, they were asked to rate 11 Likert statements that reflected their affective, behavioral, and cognitive perceptions of a peer who stuttered. The results revealed an interaction between stuttering frequency and Likert statement type. Ratings of behavioral statements (speech production characteristics) were significantly more positive for the sample containing <1% stuttering than 10% and 14% stuttering. Ratings for cognitive statements (thought and beliefs) were significantly more positive for the sample containing <1% stuttering than 10% and 14% stuttering. The stuttering frequency of the peer did not significantly influence how students rated affective statements (feelings and emotions). It was also found that male and female middle school students did not significantly differ in their perceptions of a male peer who stutters. Clinical implications are discussed relative to peer teasing, friendship, listener comfort, and social acceptance within a middle school setting for a student who stutters. Future research directions are also discussed. EDUCATIONAL
OBJECTIVES: The reader will be able to: (1) summarize how middle school students perceive stuttering; (2) explain how the frequency of stuttering influences middle school students' perceptions of a peer who stutters; and (3) provide clinical implications of the data from this study.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18762062     DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2008.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fluency Disord        ISSN: 0094-730X            Impact factor:   2.538


  5 in total

1.  Listener effort for highly intelligible tracheoesophageal speech.

Authors:  Kathy F Nagle; Tanya L Eadie
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Listener Perceptions of Simulated Fluent Speech in Nonfluent Aphasia Aphasiology.

Authors:  Tyson G Harmon; Adam Jacks; Katarina L Haley; Richard A Faldowski
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 2.773

3.  A comparison of attitudes towards stuttering of non-stuttering preschoolers in the United States and Turkey.

Authors:  Mary E Weidner; Kenneth O St Louis; Egemen Nakisci; Ramazan S Ozdemir
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2017-04-21

4.  A cluster randomised trial of a classroom communication resource program to change peer attitudes towards children who stutter among grade 7 students.

Authors:  Rizwana Mallick; Harsha Kathard; A S M Borhan; Mershen Pillay; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  The Classroom Communication Resource (CCR) intervention to change peer's attitudes towards children who stutter (CWS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rizwana Mallick; Harsha Kathard; Lehana Thabane; Mershen Pillay
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.