Literature DB >> 18761677

Examining quality improvement programs: the case of Minnesota hospitals.

John R Olson1, James A Belohlav, Lori S Cook, Julie M Hays.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a hierarchy of improvement program adoption by hospitals and outline that hierarchy. DATA SOURCES: Primary data were collected in the spring of 2007 via e-survey from 210 individuals representing 109 Minnesota hospitals. Secondary data from 2006 were assembled from the Leapfrog database. STUDY
DESIGN: As part of a larger survey, respondents were given a list of improvement programs and asked to identify those programs that are used in their hospital. DATA COLLECTION/DATA EXTRACTION: Rasch Model Analysis was used to assess whether a unidimensional construct exists that defines a hospital's ability to implement performance improvement programs. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationship of the Rasch ability scores with Leapfrog Safe Practices Scores to validate the research findings. Principal Findings. The results of the study show that hospitals have widely varying abilities in implementing improvement programs. In addition, improvement programs present differing levels of difficulty for hospitals trying to implement them. Our findings also indicate that the ability to adopt improvement programs is important to the overall performance of hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a hierarchy of improvement programs in the health care context. A hospital's ability to successfully adopt improvement programs is a function of its existing capabilities. As a hospital's capability increases, the ability to successfully implement higher level programs also increases.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18761677      PMCID: PMC2654162          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00888.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  16 in total

1.  The theoretical status of latent variables.

Authors:  Denny Borsboom; Gideon J Mellenbergh; Jaap van Heerden
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Managing clinical integration in integrated delivery systems: a framework for action.

Authors:  D W Young; D Barrett
Journal:  Hosp Health Serv Adm       Date:  1997

3.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance.

Authors:  R S Kaplan; D P Norton
Journal:  Harv Bus Rev       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb

4.  Quality management: does it pay off?

Authors:  Jaap van den Heuvel; Ad J J C Bogers; Ronald J M M Does; Sandra L van Dijk; Marc Berg
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.926

Review 5.  The 100,000 Lives Campaign: A scientific and policy review.

Authors:  Robert M Wachter; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2006-11

6.  Quality improvement implementation and hospital performance on quality indicators.

Authors:  Bryan J Weiner; Jeffrey A Alexander; Stephen M Shortell; Laurence C Baker; Mark Becker; Jeffrey J Geppert
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Treating technology as a luxury? 10 necessary tools.

Authors:  Steven H Berger
Journal:  Healthc Financ Manage       Date:  2007-02

8.  Quality exponential: the journey from 100,000 to 5 million lives.

Authors:  Karen Sandrick
Journal:  Trustee       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec

9.  Six Sigma plan delivers stellar results.

Authors:  John Geriaine
Journal:  Mater Manag Health Care       Date:  2007-04

10.  Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement/total quality management: concept versus implementation.

Authors:  S M Shortell; J L O'Brien; J M Carman; R W Foster; E F Hughes; H Boerstler; E J O'Connor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  6 in total

1.  Improving efficiency and value in health care: introduction.

Authors:  Irene Fraser; William Encinosa; Sherry Glied
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Accelerating best care at baylor dallas.

Authors:  Ziad Haydar; Marsha Cox; Pam Stafford; Vera Rodriguez; David J Ballard
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2009-10

3.  Association between hospital-reported Leapfrog Safe Practices Scores and inpatient mortality.

Authors:  Leslie P Kernisan; Sei J Lee; W John Boscardin; C Seth Landefeld; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Healthcare technologies, quality improvement programs and hospital organizational culture in Canadian hospitals.

Authors:  Rajesh K Tyagi; Lori Cook; John Olson; James Belohlav
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-13       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Relationship Between Patients' Perceptions of Care Quality and Health Care Errors in 11 Countries: A Secondary Data Analysis.

Authors:  Ana L Hincapie; Marion Slack; Daniel C Malone; Neil J MacKinnon; Terri L Warholak
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.926

6.  Exploring improvements in patient logistics in Dutch hospitals with a survey.

Authors:  Wineke A M van Lent; E Marloes Sanders; Wim H van Harten
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.