Literature DB >> 14643937

Telephone versus in-person interviews for alcohol use: results of the 2000 National Alcohol Survey.

Lorraine T Midanik1, Thomas K Greenfield.   

Abstract

This study assesses differences in reports of alcohol use and alcohol-related harms using telephone and in-person interviews in a subsample of the 2000 National Alcohol Survey (NAS) (N = 411). Respondents were given a brief telephone interview which assessed their alcohol use and alcohol-related harms in the last 12 months followed by an in-person interview 2 months later that obtained the same data. Approximately 90% (n = 371) reported their drinking status consistently between interviews (277 current drinkers; 94 non-drinkers). Approximately 7% (n = 29) became current drinkers and 2.7% (n = 11) became non-drinkers at the second interview. The majority of respondents who changed their drinking status in either direction were low level drinkers. Using logistic regression modeling, no significant associations were found between demographic factors and consistency of reported drinking status. Further, there were no differences by mode for the two alcohol consumption measures (mean daily volume and mean number of days drank five or more drinks in the last 12 months) and alcohol-related harms in the last 12 months for current drinkers (n = 277). In conjunction with other mode studies, these findings support the use of telephone interviewing in large national surveys to obtain alcohol use and alcohol-related harms data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14643937     DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(03)00204-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  62 in total

1.  Racial/ethnic differences in life-course heavy drinking from adolescence to midlife.

Authors:  Nina Mulia; Tammy W Tam; Jason Bond; Sarah E Zemore; Libo Li
Journal:  J Ethn Subst Abuse       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 1.507

2.  Randomized controlled trial of an internet-based intervention using random-digit-dial recruitment: the Disaster Recovery Web project.

Authors:  Kenneth J Ruggiero; Heidi S Resnick; Lisa A Paul; Kirstin Gros; Jenna L McCauley; Ron Acierno; Mark Morgan; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Education inequality and use of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana.

Authors:  Sandro Galea; Jennifer Ahern; Melissa Tracy; Sasha Rudenstine; David Vlahov
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Condom use with a casual partner: what distinguishes college students' use when intoxicated?

Authors:  Antonia Abbey; Michele R Parkhill; Philip O Buck; Christopher Saenz
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2007-03

5.  Neighborhood income and income distribution and the use of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana.

Authors:  Sandro Galea; Jennifer Ahern; Melissa Tracy; David Vlahov
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Housing instability and alcohol problems during the 2007-2009 US recession: the moderating role of perceived family support.

Authors:  Ryan D Murphy; Sarah E Zemore; Nina Mulia
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.671

7.  Neighborhood disadvantage and adult alcohol outcomes: differential risk by race and gender.

Authors:  Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe; Sarah E Zemore; Nina Mulia; Rhonda Jones-Webb; Jason Bond; Thomas K Greenfield
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.582

8.  Educational differences in alcohol consumption and heavy drinking: An age-period-cohort perspective.

Authors:  Camillia K Lui; William C Kerr; Nina Mulia; Yu Ye
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Neighborhood disadvantage, high alcohol content beverage consumption, drinking norms, and drinking consequences: a mediation analysis.

Authors:  Rhonda Jones-Webb; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.671

10.  Differences in risk of injury in the U.S. general population by injury treatment type: data from the 1995 to 2010 national alcohol surveys.

Authors:  Cheryl J Cherpitel; Yu Ye
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.