Literature DB >> 18761409

Gender perspectives in European research.

Ineke Klinge1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Attention to sex and gender aspects in biomedical and health-related research has been a major initiative of the EU gender equality policy for research. The EU funded GenderBasic project (2005-2008), conceived to stimulate this attention to sex and gender and to provide practical tools to researchers, resulted in the publication of 10 reviews by high-level scientists in a Supplement to Gender Medicine in December 2007: "Bringing Gender Expertise to Biomedical and Health-Related Research".
METHODS: Four commissioned reviews covered methodological aspects of addressing sex and gender in biomedical research--ranging from basic, molecular to public health research--next to six reviews that addressed sex and gender aspects relevant to selected health areas: anxiety disorders, asthma, metabolic syndrome, nutrigenomics, osteoporosis and work-related health.
RESULTS: The review articles, that were discussed at an expert meeting, attended - upon invitation - by a mixed audience of basic and clinical researchers, epidemiologists, social scientists and gender researchers, came up with excellent state of the art data, solutions to methodological and conceptual problems, practical tools and interesting questions for further research.
CONCLUSION: The expert meeting created great enthusiasm among the participants and a real exchange took place among researchers from various backgrounds. Most life sciences researchers were familiar with the concept of sex differences but confessed that the effects of socially constructed gender until now, had received too little attention. The GenderBasic project yielded three major achievements for European research: (1) it stimulated and promoted research into sex differences; (2) it stimulated research into the workings of gender, illustrated by useful examples in particular in understanding masculinity and its effects on the health of individual men; (3) it highlighted sex-gender interaction and granted gender a prominent place on the research agenda that resulted from GenderBasic. A final conclusion of the project was that it is not differences per se that are interesting but rather how, as a result of the interaction between sex and gender, differences develop. The European Commission selected the GenderBasic project itself as an excellent example of the positive impacts EU research can achieve and the project will be featured in a catalogue of 6th Framework Success Stories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18761409     DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2008.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Res        ISSN: 1043-6618            Impact factor:   7.658


  8 in total

Review 1.  Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research.

Authors:  Annaliese K Beery; Irving Zucker
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Determining If Sex Bias Exists in Human Surgical Clinical Research.

Authors:  Neel A Mansukhani; Dustin Y Yoon; Katherine A Teter; Vanessa C Stubbs; Irene B Helenowski; Teresa K Woodruff; Melina R Kibbe
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Women Have Tendons… and Tendinopathy: Gender Bias is a "Gender Void" in Sports Medicine with a Lack of Women Data on Patellar Tendinopathy-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Camilla Mondini Trissino da Lodi; Maria Paola Landini; Emanuela Asunis; Giuseppe Filardo
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-06-07

4.  The selection of experts evaluating health projects for the EU Sixth Framework Program.

Authors:  Gianluca Quaglio; Vincenzo Guardabasso; Ole F Olesen; Ruxandra Draghia-Akli
Journal:  Z Gesundh Wiss       Date:  2011-02-08

5.  Young people's awareness on biobanking and DNA profiling: results of a questionnaire administered to Italian university students.

Authors:  Pamela Tozzo; Antonio Fassina; Luciana Caenazzo
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2017-06-10

6.  Sex differences in pharmacokinetics predict adverse drug reactions in women.

Authors:  Irving Zucker; Brian J Prendergast
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 5.027

Review 7.  Confronting diversity in the production of clinical evidence goes beyond merely including under-represented groups in clinical trials.

Authors:  Karien Stronks; Nicolien F Wieringa; Anita Hardon
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 8.  "Bridging the Gap" Everything that Could Have Been Avoided If We Had Applied Gender Medicine, Pharmacogenetics and Personalized Medicine in the Gender-Omics and Sex-Omics Era.

Authors:  Donato Gemmati; Katia Varani; Barbara Bramanti; Roberta Piva; Gloria Bonaccorsi; Alessandro Trentini; Maria Cristina Manfrinato; Veronica Tisato; Alessandra Carè; Tiziana Bellini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.