Literature DB >> 18761272

Design, rationale, and populations of an international outcomes and utilization study of pharmacologic stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in contemporary practice.

James R Johnson1, Richard J Barrett, Rory Hachamovitch, James E Udelson, Joseph Massaro, Stephen A Jenkins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A prospective, international, multicenter, observational study was conducted to investigate patient and population characteristics; utilization of radiopharmaceuticals and pharmacologic stress (PS) agents; imaging protocols; clinical outcomes; the incidence, intensity, and time to onset of adverse events; and the prognostic value of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) procedures. The rationale, study methods, and data on presenting populations are described. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Investigators recorded the demographics, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease, cardiovascular risk factors, antianginal drug use, use of PS agents and associated adverse events, and radiopharmaceutical(s) and imaging protocol for each patient enrolled. SPECT images were reconstructed at each site; investigators assigned summed stress and summed rest scores using a 17-segment model (rating perfusion on a scale ranging from 0 to 4). Patients were followed up for 1 year for clinical outcomes of revascularization, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or death.
CONCLUSION: The design offers a unique opportunity to study the characteristics of patients referred for SPECT imaging over a period of time consistent with the laboratories' usual practices, provides an up-to-date PS safety registry, and allows assessment of the prognostic value of PS SPECT MPI across a wide number of covariables, as well as relationships between patient and population characteristics, SPECT MPI results, and clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18761272     DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  13 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of nuclear cardiology to diagnosis and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  G A Beller; B L Zaret
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  The economic consequences of available diagnostic and prognostic strategies for the evaluation of stable angina patients: an observational assessment of the value of precatheterization ischemia. Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis (END) Multicenter Study Group.

Authors:  L J Shaw; R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; T H Marwick; M S Lauer; G V Heller; A E Iskandrian; K L Kesler; M I Travin; H C Lewin; R C Hendel; S Borges-Neto; D D Miller
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Tolerance, hemodynamic changes, and safety of dobutamine stress perfusion imaging.

Authors:  H A Dakik; H Vempathy; M S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Impact of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography on referral to catheterization of the very elderly. Is there evidence of gender-related referral bias?

Authors:  A M Amanullah; H Kiat; R Hachamovitch; J A Cabico; I Cohen; J D Friedman; D S Berman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Prognostic indicators from radionuclide angiography in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  D B Pryor; F E Harrell; K L Lee; R A Rosati; R E Coleman; F R Cobb; R M Califf; R H Jones
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Safety of dipyridamole testing in 73,806 patients: the Multicenter Dipyridamole Safety Study.

Authors:  J Lette; J L Tatum; S Fraser; D D Miller; D D Waters; G Heller; E B Stanton; H S Bom; J Leppo; S Nattel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  The use of nuclear cardiology in clinical decision making.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.446

8.  Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry.

Authors:  M D Cerqueira; M S Verani; M Schwaiger; J Heo; A S Iskandrian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography is clinically effective and cost effective in risk stratification of patients with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) but no known CAD.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Ishac Cohen; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Hemodynamic responses and adverse effects associated with adenosine and dipyridamole pharmacologic stress testing: a comparison in 2,000 patients.

Authors:  D L Johnston; J R Daley; D O Hodge; M R Hopfenspirger; R J Gibbons
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.