OBJECTIVE: In Australia there is growing concern about the expanding solarium industry, and the additive effect of persons seeking exposure to artificial ultraviolet radiation (UVR) against already intense background levels of solar UVR. We estimated the numbers of potential skin cancers prevented through regulation of solaria and the associated cost-savings to the Federal Government. METHODS: A lifetime decision-analytic model was created using relative risk estimates based on a meta-analysis of the literature assessing the link between skin cancer risk and solarium use. The costs were limited to those incurred by Medicare Australia, for the medical care of individuals treated for skin cancer. RESULTS: With stricter regulations, we estimated between 18 and 31 melanomas, 200-251 squamous cell carcinomas and associated costs of $AU 256,054 would be avoided per 100,000 persons. Our base findings were sensitive to estimates for prevalence of use, skin cancer risk and discounting rates. CONCLUSIONS: Continued growth in the Australian solarium industry is likely to inflate the already substantial skin cancer burden. Subject to some limitations, our study indicates that by successfully enforcing solarium regulations to prohibit use by minors and by those with fair skin colour, the Federal Government could expect favourable cost and health benefits.
OBJECTIVE: In Australia there is growing concern about the expanding solarium industry, and the additive effect of persons seeking exposure to artificial ultraviolet radiation (UVR) against already intense background levels of solar UVR. We estimated the numbers of potential skin cancers prevented through regulation of solaria and the associated cost-savings to the Federal Government. METHODS: A lifetime decision-analytic model was created using relative risk estimates based on a meta-analysis of the literature assessing the link between skin cancer risk and solarium use. The costs were limited to those incurred by Medicare Australia, for the medical care of individuals treated for skin cancer. RESULTS: With stricter regulations, we estimated between 18 and 31 melanomas, 200-251 squamous cell carcinomas and associated costs of $AU 256,054 would be avoided per 100,000 persons. Our base findings were sensitive to estimates for prevalence of use, skin cancer risk and discounting rates. CONCLUSIONS: Continued growth in the Australian solarium industry is likely to inflate the already substantial skin cancer burden. Subject to some limitations, our study indicates that by successfully enforcing solarium regulations to prohibit use by minors and by those with fair skin colour, the Federal Government could expect favourable cost and health benefits.
Authors: Gery P Guy; Zahava Berkowitz; Sherry Everett Jones; Emily O'Malley Olsen; Justin N Miyamoto; Shannon L Michael; Mona Saraiya Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Joni A Mayer; Susan I Woodruff; Donald J Slymen; James F Sallis; Jean L Forster; Elizabeth J Clapp; Katherine D Hoerster; Latrice C Pichon; John R Weeks; George E Belch; Martin A Weinstock; Todd Gilmer Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Gery P Guy; Zahava Berkowitz; Eric Tai; Dawn M Holman; Sherry Everett Jones; Lisa C Richardson Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Dawn M Holman; Kathleen A Fox; Jeffrey D Glenn; Gery P Guy; Meg Watson; Katie Baker; Vilma Cokkinides; Mark Gottlieb; DeAnn Lazovich; Frank M Perna; Blake P Sampson; Andrew B Seidenberg; Craig Sinclair; Alan C Geller Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Louisa G Gordon; Thomas M Elliott; Caradee Y Wright; Nicola Deghaye; Willie Visser Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-04-02 Impact factor: 2.655