Literature DB >> 18760212

Serial evaluation of human anterior cruciate ligament grafts by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of allografts and autografts.

Koichi Muramatsu1, Yudo Hachiya, Hiroyuki Izawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to clarify the difference in remodeling between allografts and autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
METHODS: We examined 24 knees with bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts and 20 knees with central-third bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts. Surgical patients from January 1997 to December 2002 were included in the study, and more than 1 year had passed since surgery. The mean postoperative follow-up was 24.0 months in the allograft group and 21.3 months in the autograft group. Patients with a positive Lachman test were excluded. The operative method and postoperative rehabilitation programs were the same. All allografts were provided by Tokai Regional Bone Bank, the only regional bone bank in Japan. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (1.0 T, T1-weighted, sagittal section, infusion of 0.2-mL/kg gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid [Gd-DTPA]) was performed for all knees at 1, 4, 6, and 12 months after surgery and performed for some knees irregularly thereafter. The signal/noise quotient (SNQ) of grafts was calculated by use of magnetic resonance imaging based on the method of Weiler et al. (2001) as follows: SNQ = (Signal of ACL graft - Signal of quadriceps tendon)/Signal of background.
RESULTS: The SNQ of allografts was significantly lower than for autografts 12 months after surgery. As for the SNQ 1 month after surgery, there was no difference before or after Gd-DTPA infusion in the allografts; however, the SNQ was significantly higher after Gd-DTPA infusion in autografts. The SNQ after Gd-DTPA infusion continued to increase until 12 to 24 months in the allograft group but peaked at 4 or 6 months in the autograft group.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with autologous tendons, allogeneic tendons have a slower onset and rate of revascularization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18760212     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  39 in total

1.  Anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ligaments of the ankle with semitendinosus allograft.

Authors:  Yinghui Hua; Shiyi Chen; Yongjia Jin; Bimeng Zhang; Yunxia Li; Hong Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Clinical outcomes of remnant preserving augmentation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jianzhong Hu; Jin Qu; Daqi Xu; Tao Zhang; Jingyong Zhou; Hongbin Lu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  PATIENT-SPECIFIC AND SURGERY-SPECIFIC FACTORS THAT AFFECT RETURN TO SPORT AFTER ACL RECONSTRUCTION.

Authors:  Rick Joreitz; Andrew Lynch; Stephen Rabuck; Brittany Lynch; Sarah Davin; James Irrgang
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-04

4.  Chronological changes in cross-sectional area of the bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft after anatomic rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Kazutaka Kinugasa; Masayuki Hamada; Yasukazu Yonetani; Akira Tsujii; Tomohiko Matsuo; Yoshinari Tanaka; Yuta Tachibana; Konsei Shino
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Superior graft maturation after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transtibial drilling technique compared to the transportal technique.

Authors:  Masahiko Saito; Arata Nakajima; Masato Sonobe; Hiroshi Takahashi; Yorikazu Akatsu; Tsutomu Inaoka; Junichi Iwasaki; Tsuguo Morikawa; Atsuya Watanabe; Yasuchika Aoki; Takahisa Sasho; Koichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Evaluation with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament graft during its healing process: a two-year prospective study.

Authors:  Aikaterini Ntoulia; Frederica Papadopoulou; Franceska Zampeli; Stavros Ristanis; Maria Argyropoulou; Anastasios Georgoulis
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging after allograft double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Motoko Miyawaki; Daniel Hensler; Kenneth D Illingworth; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Magnetic resonance angiography evaluation of the bone tunnel and graft following ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft.

Authors:  Ryu Terauchi; Yuji Arai; Kunio Hara; Ginjiro Minami; Shuji Nakagawa; Takeshi Takahashi; Kazuya Ikoma; Keiichiro Ueshima; Toshiharu Shirai; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  MRI-based ACL graft maturity does not predict clinical and functional outcomes during the first year after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Hong Li; Jiwu Chen; Hongyun Li; Ziying Wu; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Factors influencing the long-term behavior of extracellular matrix-derived scaffolds for musculoskeletal soft tissue repair.

Authors:  Christopher R Rowland; Dianne Little; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.