OBJECTIVE: To determine whether resting activity of the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) and abdominal muscles varied in different sitting postures in parous women with and without stress urinary incontinence (SUI). DESIGN: PFM and abdominal muscle activity was recorded in 3 sitting postures: slump supported, upright unsupported, and very tall unsupported. Spinal curves were measured in slump supported and upright unsupported. SETTING: A research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Women (N=17) with a history of vaginal delivery, 8 who were symptomatic of SUI and 9 who were asymptomatic. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Electromyographic activity of (1) the resting PFM recorded per vaginam with surface electrodes and (2) superficial abdominal muscles using surface electrodes. Changes in spinal curves were measured with a flexible ruler. RESULTS: Electromyographic activity of the PFM increased significantly from slump supported to upright unsupported postures in both groups (P<.001) but with lower levels of activity in women with SUI (P<.05). PFM activity increased further in very tall unsupported sitting in comparison with slump supported sitting (P<.001). Obliquus internus abdominis electromyographic activity was greater in upright unsupported than in slump supported sitting (P<.05), and electromyographic activity of other abdominal muscles was greater in very tall unsupported than slump supported. Women with SUI had a trend for greater activity in the abdominal muscles in upright unsupported than asymptomatic women. Asymptomatic women had a greater depth of lumbar lordosis in upright unsupported sitting than women with SUI (P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: More upright sitting postures recruit greater PFM resting activity irrespective of continence status. Further investigation should consider the effect of sitting posture in rehabilitation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether resting activity of the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) and abdominal muscles varied in different sitting postures in parous women with and without stress urinary incontinence (SUI). DESIGN:PFM and abdominal muscle activity was recorded in 3 sitting postures: slump supported, upright unsupported, and very tall unsupported. Spinal curves were measured in slump supported and upright unsupported. SETTING: A research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Women (N=17) with a history of vaginal delivery, 8 who were symptomatic of SUI and 9 who were asymptomatic. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Electromyographic activity of (1) the resting PFM recorded per vaginam with surface electrodes and (2) superficial abdominal muscles using surface electrodes. Changes in spinal curves were measured with a flexible ruler. RESULTS: Electromyographic activity of the PFM increased significantly from slump supported to upright unsupported postures in both groups (P<.001) but with lower levels of activity in women with SUI (P<.05). PFM activity increased further in very tall unsupported sitting in comparison with slump supported sitting (P<.001). Obliquus internus abdominis electromyographic activity was greater in upright unsupported than in slump supported sitting (P<.05), and electromyographic activity of other abdominal muscles was greater in very tall unsupported than slump supported. Women with SUI had a trend for greater activity in the abdominal muscles in upright unsupported than asymptomatic women. Asymptomatic women had a greater depth of lumbar lordosis in upright unsupported sitting than women with SUI (P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: More upright sitting postures recruit greater PFM resting activity irrespective of continence status. Further investigation should consider the effect of sitting posture in rehabilitation.
Authors: Marieke L van Engelenburg-van Lonkhuyzen; Esther M J Bols; Marc A Benninga; Wim A Verwijs; Rob A de Bie Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Marieke L van Engelenburg-van Lonkhuyzen; Esther M J Bols; Marc A Benninga; Wim A Verwijs; Netty M W L Bluijssen; Rob A de Bie Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Tomasz Halski; Lucyna Słupska; Robert Dymarek; Janusz Bartnicki; Urszula Halska; Agata Król; Małgorzata Paprocka-Borowicz; Janusz Dembowski; Romuald Zdrojowy; Kuba Ptaszkowski Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 3.411