OBJECT: Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is increasingly used to investigate new treatments for central nervous system disorders. Although the properties of CED are well established in normal gray and white matter central nervous system structures, the effects on drug distribution imposed by ependymal and pial surfaces are not precisely defined. To determine the effect of these anatomical boundaries on CED, the authors infused low MW and high MW tracers for MR imaging near ependymal (periventricular) and pial (pericisternal) surfaces. METHODS: Five primates underwent CED of Gd-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA; MW 590 D) or Gd-bound albumin (Gd-albumin; MW 72,000 D) during serial real-time MR imaging (FLAIR and T1-weighted sequences). Periventricular (caudate) infusions were performed unilaterally in 1 animal (volume of infusion [Vi] 57 microl) and bilaterally in 1 animal with Gd-DTPA (Vi = 40 mul on each side), and bilaterally in 1 animal with Gd-albumin (Vi = 80 microl on each side). Pericisternal infusions were performed in 2 animals with Gd-DTPA (Vi = 190 microl) or with Gd-albumin (Vi = 185 microl) (1 animal each). Clinical effects, MR imaging, and histology were analyzed. RESULTS: Large regions of the brain and brainstem were perfused with both tracers. Intraparenchymal distribution was successfully tracked in real time by using T1-weighted MR imaging. During infusion, the volume of distribution (Vd) increased linearly (R2 = 0.98) with periventricular (mean Vd/Vi ratio +/- standard deviation; 4.5 +/- 0.5) and pericisternal (5.2 +/- 0.3) Vi, but did so only until the leading edge of distribution reached the ependymal or pial surfaces, respectively. After the infusate reached either surface, the Vd/Vi decreased significantly (ependyma 2.9 +/- 0.8, pia mater 3.6 +/- 1.0; p < 0.05) and infusate entry into the ventricular or cisternal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was identified on FLAIR but not on T1-weighted MR images. CONCLUSIONS: Ependymal and pial boundaries are permeable to small and large molecules delivered interstitially by convection. Once infusate reaches these surfaces, a portion enters the adjacent ventricular or cisternal CSF and the tissue Vd/Vi ratio decreases. Although T1-weighted MR imaging is best for tracking intraparenchymal infusate distribution, FLAIR MR imaging is the most sensitive and accurate for detecting entry of Gd-labeled imaging compounds into CSF during CED.
OBJECT: Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is increasingly used to investigate new treatments for central nervous system disorders. Although the properties of CED are well established in normal gray and white matter central nervous system structures, the effects on drug distribution imposed by ependymal and pial surfaces are not precisely defined. To determine the effect of these anatomical boundaries on CED, the authors infused low MW and high MW tracers for MR imaging near ependymal (periventricular) and pial (pericisternal) surfaces. METHODS: Five primates underwent CED of Gd-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA; MW 590 D) or Gd-bound albumin (Gd-albumin; MW 72,000 D) during serial real-time MR imaging (FLAIR and T1-weighted sequences). Periventricular (caudate) infusions were performed unilaterally in 1 animal (volume of infusion [Vi] 57 microl) and bilaterally in 1 animal with Gd-DTPA (Vi = 40 mul on each side), and bilaterally in 1 animal with Gd-albumin (Vi = 80 microl on each side). Pericisternal infusions were performed in 2 animals with Gd-DTPA (Vi = 190 microl) or with Gd-albumin (Vi = 185 microl) (1 animal each). Clinical effects, MR imaging, and histology were analyzed. RESULTS: Large regions of the brain and brainstem were perfused with both tracers. Intraparenchymal distribution was successfully tracked in real time by using T1-weighted MR imaging. During infusion, the volume of distribution (Vd) increased linearly (R2 = 0.98) with periventricular (mean Vd/Vi ratio +/- standard deviation; 4.5 +/- 0.5) and pericisternal (5.2 +/- 0.3) Vi, but did so only until the leading edge of distribution reached the ependymal or pial surfaces, respectively. After the infusate reached either surface, the Vd/Vi decreased significantly (ependyma 2.9 +/- 0.8, pia mater 3.6 +/- 1.0; p < 0.05) and infusate entry into the ventricular or cisternal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was identified on FLAIR but not on T1-weighted MR images. CONCLUSIONS: Ependymal and pial boundaries are permeable to small and large molecules delivered interstitially by convection. Once infusate reaches these surfaces, a portion enters the adjacent ventricular or cisternal CSF and the tissue Vd/Vi ratio decreases. Although T1-weighted MR imaging is best for tracking intraparenchymal infusate distribution, FLAIR MR imaging is the most sensitive and accurate for detecting entry of Gd-labeled imaging compounds into CSF during CED.
Authors: Russell R Lonser; Stuart Walbridge; Kayhan Garmestani; John A Butman; Hugh A Walters; Alexander O Vortmeyer; Paul F Morrison; Martin W Brechbiel; Edward H Oldfield Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Juergen Voges; Regina Reszka; Axel Gossmann; Claus Dittmar; Raphaela Richter; Guido Garlip; Lutz Kracht; Heinz H Coenen; Volker Sturm; Karl Wienhard; Wolf-Dieter Heiss; Andreas H Jacobs Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Tung T Nguyen; Yashdip S Pannu; Cynthia Sung; Robert L Dedrick; Stuart Walbridge; Martin W Brechbiel; Kayhan Garmestani; Markus Beitzel; Alexander T Yordanov; Edward H Oldfield Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: D W Laske; P F Morrison; D M Lieberman; M E Corthesy; J C Reynolds; P A Stewart-Henney; S S Koong; A Cummins; C H Paik; E H Oldfield Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: R H Bobo; D W Laske; A Akbasak; P F Morrison; R L Dedrick; E H Oldfield Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1994-03-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Gregory J A Murad; Stuart Walbridge; Paul F Morrison; Nicholas Szerlip; John A Butman; Edward H Oldfield; Russell R Lonser Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Jung Hwan Kim; Garrett W Astary; Tatiana L Nobrega; Svetlana Kantorovich; Paul R Carney; Thomas H Mareci; Malisa Sarntinoranont Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2012-06-08 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Neal Luther; Nai-Kong Cheung; Eleni P Souliopoulos; Ioannis Karampelas; Ioannis Karempelas; Daniel Bassiri; Mark A Edgar; Hong-Fen Guo; Ira Pastan; Philip H Gutin; Mark M Souweidane Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2010-04-06 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Wei Dai; Garrett W Astary; Aditya K Kasinadhuni; Paul R Carney; Thomas H Mareci; Malisa Sarntinoranont Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Jung Hwan Kim; Garrett W Astary; Svetlana Kantorovich; Thomas H Mareci; Paul R Carney; Malisa Sarntinoranont Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2012-04-25 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Andreas Androutsellis-Theotokis; Maria A Rueger; Deric M Park; Haik Mkhikian; Erica Korb; Steve W Poser; Stuart Walbridge; Jeeva Munasinghe; Alan P Koretsky; Russel R Lonser; Ronald D McKay Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Neal Luther; Zhiping Zhou; Pat Zanzonico; Nai-Kong Cheung; John Humm; Mark A Edgar; Mark M Souweidane Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 12.300