BACKGROUND: Contrast enhanced multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) is the leading modality in non-invasive coronary angiography (CTA) today. We investigated MSCT based assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) by analyzing assets and drawbacks of CTA in order to define demands on latest technology. METHODS: In a clinical setting 39 CABG patients (69.2 +/- 1.4 years; male n = 36) underwent CTA (collimation 16 x 0.75 mm, contrast medium 100 ml; 320 mAs, 120 KV). Ninety-seven CABG (61 venous, 36 arterial grafts) were evaluated. A subgroup of 18 patients underwent additional invasive coronary angiography (CA). RESULTS: CTA for CABG assessment resulted in an overall sensitivity (sens.) of 100%, specificity (spec.) of 92.4% and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of 60% and 100%, respectively. CABG anastomoses showed slightly inferior diagnostic accuracy than other CABG segments. Limitations in imaging quality caused 21% unevaluable segments of the CABG anastomoses. Evaluation of native vessel segments proximal and distal to the anastomoses resulted in a sens, spec, PPV and NPV of 57.5, 94.6, 92 and 67.3%, respectively. With 28.5% unevaluable segments, the native vessel segments showed serious limitations in imaging quality. Radiation exposure was 9.88 +/- 3.20 mSv (9.69 +/- 3.25 mSv male; 12.08 +/- 1.35 mSv female). CONCLUSION: 16-slice MSCT based CABG assessment offers sufficient diagnostic accuracy. However, focussing on the bypass anastomoses and the native revascularized coronary arteries, clinical value is limited.
BACKGROUND: Contrast enhanced multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) is the leading modality in non-invasive coronary angiography (CTA) today. We investigated MSCT based assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) by analyzing assets and drawbacks of CTA in order to define demands on latest technology. METHODS: In a clinical setting 39 CABG patients (69.2 +/- 1.4 years; male n = 36) underwent CTA (collimation 16 x 0.75 mm, contrast medium 100 ml; 320 mAs, 120 KV). Ninety-seven CABG (61 venous, 36 arterial grafts) were evaluated. A subgroup of 18 patients underwent additional invasive coronary angiography (CA). RESULTS:CTA for CABG assessment resulted in an overall sensitivity (sens.) of 100%, specificity (spec.) of 92.4% and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of 60% and 100%, respectively. CABG anastomoses showed slightly inferior diagnostic accuracy than other CABG segments. Limitations in imaging quality caused 21% unevaluable segments of the CABG anastomoses. Evaluation of native vessel segments proximal and distal to the anastomoses resulted in a sens, spec, PPV and NPV of 57.5, 94.6, 92 and 67.3%, respectively. With 28.5% unevaluable segments, the native vessel segments showed serious limitations in imaging quality. Radiation exposure was 9.88 +/- 3.20 mSv (9.69 +/- 3.25 mSv male; 12.08 +/- 1.35 mSv female). CONCLUSION: 16-slice MSCT based CABG assessment offers sufficient diagnostic accuracy. However, focussing on the bypass anastomoses and the native revascularized coronary arteries, clinical value is limited.
Authors: Thomas Flohr; Axel Küttner; Herbert Bruder; Karl Stierstorfer; Sandra S Halliburton; Stefan Schaller; Bernd M Ohnesorge Journal: Herz Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 1.443
Authors: Koen Nieman; Peter M T Pattynama; Benno J Rensing; Robert-Jan M Van Geuns; Pim J De Feyter Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Stephen Schroeder; Stephan Achenbach; Frank Bengel; Christof Burgstahler; Filippo Cademartiri; Pim de Feyter; Richard George; Philipp Kaufmann; Andreas F Kopp; Juhani Knuuti; Dieter Ropers; Joanne Schuijf; Laurens F Tops; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Tanja S Meyer; Stefan Martinoff; Martin Hadamitzky; Albrecht Will; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig; Jörg Hausleiter Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-02-20 Impact factor: 24.094