STUDY DESIGN: Prognostic Study, Level II (Retrospective review of prospectively collected data). OBJECTIVE: To identify an association between preoperative narcotic use and clinical outcome after cervical arthrodesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Little data exists regarding the influence that chronic preoperative narcotic use has on clinical outcomes after surgery. Cervical arthrodesis is a common procedure that has a predictably high success rate for relief of radicular pain. In addition, the patient population presenting for this procedure has a high propensity for preoperative narcotic use. METHODS: Charts and prospectively collected questionnaires concerning the use of pain medication from 91 consecutive patients who underwent cervical arthrodesis for relief of radicular pain by a single surgeon at a single institution were reviewed. Group I consisted of 47 patients who took narcotic pain medication for their radicular pain on a daily basis for greater than 6 months before surgery. Group II consisted of 44 patients who were not on narcotics chronically before surgery. Postoperative narcotic use and patient outcome based on the modified Robinson criteria were assessed. Patients were observed for a minimum of 2 years. RESULTS: Of the group I patients, 16 (34%) continued to require chronic narcotic pain medication up to 2 years after surgery whereas only 3 (7%) of the group II patients required narcotic pain medication past 3 months (P = 0.002). Of the group I patients, 24 (51%) had a good or excellent result after surgery and 15 (32%) had a poor result whereas 38 (86%) of the group II patients had a good or excellent result and no patient had a poor result (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Chronic narcotic use before cervical arthrodesis was found to be associated with continued narcotic use after surgery and worse functional outcomes following surgery. While further studies will be necessary to ascertain if this relationship is generalizable to other orthopaedic procedures and to analyze for potential confounding variables, surgeons may want to counsel their patients about the potential for inferior clinical outcomes if narcotics are used before surgery.
STUDY DESIGN: Prognostic Study, Level II (Retrospective review of prospectively collected data). OBJECTIVE: To identify an association between preoperative narcotic use and clinical outcome after cervical arthrodesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Little data exists regarding the influence that chronic preoperative narcotic use has on clinical outcomes after surgery. Cervical arthrodesis is a common procedure that has a predictably high success rate for relief of radicular pain. In addition, the patient population presenting for this procedure has a high propensity for preoperative narcotic use. METHODS: Charts and prospectively collected questionnaires concerning the use of pain medication from 91 consecutive patients who underwent cervical arthrodesis for relief of radicular pain by a single surgeon at a single institution were reviewed. Group I consisted of 47 patients who took narcotic pain medication for their radicular pain on a daily basis for greater than 6 months before surgery. Group II consisted of 44 patients who were not on narcotics chronically before surgery. Postoperative narcotic use and patient outcome based on the modified Robinson criteria were assessed. Patients were observed for a minimum of 2 years. RESULTS: Of the group I patients, 16 (34%) continued to require chronic narcotic pain medication up to 2 years after surgery whereas only 3 (7%) of the group II patients required narcotic pain medication past 3 months (P = 0.002). Of the group I patients, 24 (51%) had a good or excellent result after surgery and 15 (32%) had a poor result whereas 38 (86%) of the group II patients had a good or excellent result and no patient had a poor result (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Chronic narcotic use before cervical arthrodesis was found to be associated with continued narcotic use after surgery and worse functional outcomes following surgery. While further studies will be necessary to ascertain if this relationship is generalizable to other orthopaedic procedures and to analyze for potential confounding variables, surgeons may want to counsel their patients about the potential for inferior clinical outcomes if narcotics are used before surgery.
Authors: Savannah R Smith; Jennifer Bido; Jamie E Collins; Heidi Yang; Jeffrey N Katz; Elena Losina Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Michael L Kent; Robert W Hurley; Gary M Oderda; Debra B Gordon; Eric Sun; Monty Mythen; Timothy E Miller; Andrew D Shaw; Tong J Gan; Julie K M Thacker; Matthew D McEvoy Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Alexandra Stratton; Eugene Wai; Stephen Kingwell; Philippe Phan; Darren Roffey; Mohamed El Koussy; Sean Christie; Peter Jarzem; Parham Rasoulinejad; Steve Casha; Jerome Paquet; Michael Johnson; Edward Abraham; Hamilton Hall; Greg McIntosh; Kenneth Thomas; Raja Rampersaud; Neil Manson; Charles Fisher Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Carolyn W Swenson; Neil S Kamdar; Kristian Seiler; Daniel M Morgan; Paul Lin; Sawsan As-Sanie Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Robert Pivec; Kimona Issa; Qais Naziri; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Peter M Bonutti; Michael A Mont Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Kristen Radcliff; Mitchell Freedman; Alan Hilibrand; Roman Isaac; Jon D Lurie; Wenyan Zhao; Alex Vaccaro; Todd Albert; James N Weinstein Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2013-06-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Rebecca E Scully; Andrew J Schoenfeld; Wei Jiang; Stuart Lipsitz; Muhammad Ali Chaudhary; Peter A Learn; Tracey Koehlmoos; Adil H Haider; Louis L Nguyen Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 14.766