Literature DB >> 18758348

Relation between changes in posteroanterior stiffness and active range of movement of the cervical spine following manual therapy treatment.

Neil Tuttle1, Rod Barrett, Liisa Laakso.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Repeated measures study of active and passive movements in patients with neck pain.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if, following manual therapy: (1) changes occur in active range of movement (AROM) and stiffness of posteroanterior (PA) movements, (2) such changes are dependent on the location treated, and (3) there is a relation between changes in PA stiffness and AROM. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PA movements are frequently used to assess patients with neck pain but little is known about how these movements are related to patient symptoms.
METHODS: One location deemed symptomatic and hypomobile and 1 asymptomatic location were selected in 20 patients with neck pain for more than 2 weeks. PA stiffness at each location and AROM were measured before and after each of 4 manual therapy interventions: PA movements to each location, a general treatment, and a control intervention.
RESULTS: The general intervention had a greater increase in each axis of AROM than the other interventions (F = 2.814 to 7.929, DF = 3) but there were no differences in PA stiffness across interventions (F = 0.945, DF = 3). Differences in PA stiffness was divided into regions by applied force. After treatment to the symptomatic location, regions of stiffness at forces above 8 N demonstrated significant correlations with total AROM (R = -0.466 to -0.628).
CONCLUSION: After manual therapy, increased AROM is related to decreased PA stiffness in patients with neck pain, but only for the treated location and only when that location had been identified previously as symptomatic and hypomobile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18758348     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817f93f9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  The effect of duration and amplitude of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) on spinal stiffness.

Authors:  Michèle Vaillant; Tiffany Edgecombe; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar; Gregory N Kawchuk
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2012-07-17

2.  A preliminary study comparing the use of cervical/upper thoracic mobilization and manipulation for individuals with mechanical neck pain.

Authors:  David Griswold; Ken Learman; Bryan O'Halloran; Josh Cleland
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-05

3.  Systematic review of clinical trials of cervical manipulation: control group procedures and pain outcomes.

Authors:  Howard Vernon; Aaron Puhl; Christine Reinhart
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2011-01-11

4.  Development of an Objective Portable Measurement Device for Spinal Joint Accessory Motion Testing.

Authors:  Hsiao-Kuan Wu; Hung-Jen Lai; Ting Teng; Chung-Huang Yu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Sensorimotor performance in acute-subacute non-specific neck pain: a non-randomized prospective clinical trial with intervention.

Authors:  Renaud Hage; Christine Detrembleur; Frédéric Dierick; Jean-Michel Brismée; Nathalie Roussel; Laurent Pitance
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Mario Millan; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde; Brian Budgell; Martin Descarreaux; Michel-Ange Amorim
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2012-08-06

7.  Effects of Cervical Spine Mobilization on Respiratory Function and Cervical Angles of Stroke Patients: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Ho Jung An; Shin Jun Park
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.