OBJECTIVES: A validated canine critical-sized segmental defect model was used to compare efficacy of volumetric ratios of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2)/absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) with cancellous allograft bone or biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic granules using radiographic, biomechanical, and histologic analyses. METHODS: Eighteen mixed-breed hounds received bilateral critical-sized ulnar segmental defects. The six treatment groups included 1:5, 1:2, and 1:1 volumetric ratios of rhBMP-2/ACS to cancellous allograft chips; a 1:1 volumetric ratio of rhBMP-2/ACS to biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic granules; iliac crest autograft alone; and cancellous allograft chips alone (n = 6 ulna per group). Animals were euthanized at 12 weeks and analyzed by radiography, torsion testing, and histology. RESULTS: rhBMP-2/ACS groups demonstrated higher radiographic union than autograft or allograft at 12 weeks. Both treatment groups receiving a 1:1 ratio demonstrated union rates of 100% (12/12 ulna) compared with 17% (1/6) and 0% (0/6) for autograft and allograft, respectively. Torsion testing to failure demonstrated significant increases in maximum torque for all rhBMP-2 groups compared with autograft, but no differences between the rhBMP-2 groups. Ulnae treated with the 1:1 volume ratio of rhBMP-2/ACS to ceramic had the highest histologic union grades followed by 1:1 and 1:2 volume ratios of rhBMP-2/ACS to allograft. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, efficacy of the treatment correlated with the ratio of rhBMP-2/ACS to allograft. As volume of rhBMP-2/ACS decreased below a 1:1 volume ratio, the overall efficacy decreased, thus indicating a potential limit to extending rhBMP-2/ACS past a 1:1 volumetric ratio in large segmental defects. Furthermore, ceramic was found to be a successful replacement for cancellous allograft bone at a 1:1 volumetric ratio. Clinical application using graft expanders or bone void fillers with rhBMP-2 should be used carefully and requires further investigation.
OBJECTIVES: A validated canine critical-sized segmental defect model was used to compare efficacy of volumetric ratios of recombinant humanbone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2)/absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) with cancellous allograft bone or biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic granules using radiographic, biomechanical, and histologic analyses. METHODS: Eighteen mixed-breed hounds received bilateral critical-sized ulnar segmental defects. The six treatment groups included 1:5, 1:2, and 1:1 volumetric ratios of rhBMP-2/ACS to cancellous allograft chips; a 1:1 volumetric ratio of rhBMP-2/ACS to biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic granules; iliac crest autograft alone; and cancellous allograft chips alone (n = 6 ulna per group). Animals were euthanized at 12 weeks and analyzed by radiography, torsion testing, and histology. RESULTS:rhBMP-2/ACS groups demonstrated higher radiographic union than autograft or allograft at 12 weeks. Both treatment groups receiving a 1:1 ratio demonstrated union rates of 100% (12/12 ulna) compared with 17% (1/6) and 0% (0/6) for autograft and allograft, respectively. Torsion testing to failure demonstrated significant increases in maximum torque for all rhBMP-2 groups compared with autograft, but no differences between the rhBMP-2 groups. Ulnae treated with the 1:1 volume ratio of rhBMP-2/ACS to ceramic had the highest histologic union grades followed by 1:1 and 1:2 volume ratios of rhBMP-2/ACS to allograft. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, efficacy of the treatment correlated with the ratio of rhBMP-2/ACS to allograft. As volume of rhBMP-2/ACS decreased below a 1:1 volume ratio, the overall efficacy decreased, thus indicating a potential limit to extending rhBMP-2/ACS past a 1:1 volumetric ratio in large segmental defects. Furthermore, ceramic was found to be a successful replacement for cancellous allograft bone at a 1:1 volumetric ratio. Clinical application using graft expanders or bone void fillers with rhBMP-2 should be used carefully and requires further investigation.
Authors: Stephen D Cook; Laura P Patron; Samantha L Salkeld; Kirk E Smith; Bruce Whiting; Robert L Barrack Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Laxminarayanan Krishnan; Lauren B Priddy; Camden Esancy; Mon-Tzu Alice Li; Hazel Y Stevens; Xi Jiang; Lisa Tran; David W Rowe; Robert E Guldberg Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Sreevathsa Boraiah; Omesh Paul; David Hawkes; Matthew Wickham; Dean G Lorich Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2009-08-20 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Ben Antebi; Longze Zhang; Dmitriy Sheyn; Gadi Pelled; Xinping Zhang; Zulma Gazit; Edward M Schwarz; Dan Gazit Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) Date: 2016-03