Literature DB >> 25917422

Hydrogel-based Delivery of rhBMP-2 Improves Healing of Large Bone Defects Compared With Autograft.

Laxminarayanan Krishnan1, Lauren B Priddy, Camden Esancy, Mon-Tzu Alice Li, Hazel Y Stevens, Xi Jiang, Lisa Tran, David W Rowe, Robert E Guldberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Autologous bone grafting remains the gold standard in the treatment of large bone defects but is limited by tissue availability and donor site morbidity. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2), delivered with a collagen sponge, is clinically used to treat large bone defects and complications such as delayed healing or nonunion. For the same dose of rhBMP-2, we have shown that a hybrid nanofiber mesh-alginate (NMA-rhBMP-2) delivery system provides longer-term release and increases functional bone regeneration in critically sized rat femoral bone defects compared with a collagen sponge. However, no comparisons of healing efficiencies have been made thus far between this hybrid delivery system and the gold standard of using autograft. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We compared the efficacy of the NMA-rhBMP-2 hybrid delivery system to morselized autograft and hypothesized that the functional regeneration of large bone defects observed with sustained BMP delivery would be at least comparable to autograft treatment as measured by total bone volume and ex vivo mechanical properties.
METHODS: Bilateral critically sized femoral bone defects in rats were treated with either live autograft or with the NMA-rhBMP-2 hybrid delivery system such that each animal received one treatment per leg. Healing was monitored by radiography and histology at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Defects were evaluated for bone formation by longitudinal micro-CT scans over 12 weeks (n = 14 per group). The bone volume, bone density, and the total new bone formed beyond 2 weeks within the defect were calculated from micro-CT reconstructions and values compared for the 2-, 4-, 8-, and 12-week scans within and across the two treatment groups. Two animals were used for bone labeling with subcutaneously injected dyes at 4, 8, and 12 weeks followed by histology at 12 weeks to identify incremental new bone formation. Functional recovery was measured by ex vivo biomechanical testing (n = 9 per group). Maximum torque and torsional stiffness calculated from torsion testing of the femurs at 12 weeks were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The NMA-rhBMP-2 hybrid delivery system resulted in greater bone formation and improved biomechanical properties compared with autograft at 12 weeks. Comparing new bone volume within each group, the NMA-rhBMP-2-treated group had higher volume (p < 0.001) at 12 weeks (72.59 ± 18.34 mm(3)) compared with 8 weeks (54.90 ± 16.14) and 4 weeks (14.22 ± 9.59). The new bone volume was also higher at 8 weeks compared with 4 weeks (p < 0.001). The autograft group showed higher (p <0.05) new bone volume at 8 weeks (11.19 ± 8.59 mm(3)) and 12 weeks (14.64 ± 10.36) compared with 4 weeks (5.15 ± 4.90). Between groups, the NMA-rhBMP-2-treated group had higher (p < 0.001) new bone volume than the autograft group at both 8 and 12 weeks. Local mineralized matrix density in the NMA-rhBMP-2-treated group was lower than that of the autograft group at all time points (p < 0.001). Presence of nuclei within the lacunae of the autograft and early appositional bone formation seen in representative histology sections suggested that the bone grafts remained viable and were functionally engrafted within the defect. The bone label distribution from representative sections also revealed more diffuse mineralization in the defect in the NMA-rhBMP-2-treated group, whereas more localized distribution of new mineral was seen at the edges of the graft pieces in the autograft group. The NMA-rhBMP-2-treated group also revealed higher torsional stiffness (0.042 ± 0.019 versus 0.020 ± 0.022 N-m/°; p = 0.037) and higher maximum torque (0.270 ± 0.108 versus 0.125 ± 0.137 N-m; p = 0.024) compared with autograft.
CONCLUSIONS: The NMA-rhBMP-2 hybrid delivery system improved bone formation and restoration of biomechanical function of rat segmental bone defects compared with autograft treatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Delivery systems that allow prolonged availability of BMP may provide an effective clinical alternative to autograft treatment for repair of segmental bone defects. Future studies in a large animal model comparing mixed cortical-trabecular autograft and the NMA-rhBMP-2 hybrid delivery system are the next step toward clinical translation of this approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25917422      PMCID: PMC4523508          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4312-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  44 in total

1.  Examination of mineralized nodule formation in living osteoblastic cultures using fluorescent dyes.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiung Wang; Yaling Liu; Peter Maye; David W Rowe
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

2.  Quantitative assessment of scaffold and growth factor-mediated repair of critically sized bone defects.

Authors:  Megan E Oest; Kenneth M Dupont; Hyun-Joon Kong; David J Mooney; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Adverse effects associated with high-dose recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 use in anterior cervical spine fusion.

Authors:  Lisa B E Shields; George H Raque; Steven D Glassman; Mitchell Campbell; Todd Vitaz; John Harpring; Christopher B Shields
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Visualizing normal and defective bone development in zebrafish embryos using the fluorescent chromophore calcein.

Authors:  S J Du; V Frenkel; G Kindschi; Y Zohar
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Spatiotemporal delivery of bone morphogenetic protein enhances functional repair of segmental bone defects.

Authors:  Yash M Kolambkar; Joel D Boerckel; Kenneth M Dupont; Mehmet Bajin; Nathaniel Huebsch; David J Mooney; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Evaluation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 as a bone-graft substitute in a canine segmental defect model.

Authors:  M F Sciadini; K D Johnson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Morbidity at bone graft donor sites.

Authors:  E M Younger; M W Chapman
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Reconstruction with non-vascularised fibular grafts after resection of bone tumours.

Authors:  A H Krieg; F Hefti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-02

9.  Impaired angiogenesis, early callus formation, and late stage remodeling in fracture healing of osteopontin-deficient mice.

Authors:  Craig L Duvall; W Robert Taylor; Daiana Weiss; Abigail M Wojtowicz; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Dual growth factor delivery and controlled scaffold degradation enhance in vivo bone formation by transplanted bone marrow stromal cells.

Authors:  Craig A Simmons; Eben Alsberg; Susan Hsiong; Woo J Kim; David J Mooney
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  10 in total

1.  BMP-2 delivery strategy modulates local bone regeneration and systemic immune responses to complex extremity trauma.

Authors:  Casey E Vantucci; Laxminarayanan Krishan; Albert Cheng; Ayanna Prather; Krishnendu Roy; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 6.843

2.  Controlled JAGGED1 delivery induces human embryonic palate mesenchymal cells to form osteoblasts.

Authors:  Jean De La Croix Ndong; Yvonne Stephenson; Michael E Davis; Andrés J García; Steven Goudy
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  * Skeletal Myoblast-Seeded Vascularized Tissue Scaffolds in the Treatment of a Large Volumetric Muscle Defect in the Rat Biceps Femoris Muscle.

Authors:  Mon-Tzu Li; Marissa A Ruehle; Hazel Y Stevens; Nick Servies; Nick J Willett; Sukhita Karthikeyakannan; Gordon L Warren; Robert E Guldberg; Laxminarayanan Krishnan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Amniotic membrane attenuates heterotopic ossification following high-dose bone morphogenetic protein-2 treatment of segmental bone defects.

Authors:  Lauren B Priddy; Laxminarayanan Krishnan; Marian H Hettiaratchi; Sukhita Karthikeyakannan; Nikhil Gupte; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 3.102

5.  Delivery vehicle effects on bone regeneration and heterotopic ossification induced by high dose BMP-2.

Authors:  Laxminarayanan Krishnan; Lauren B Priddy; Camden Esancy; Brett S Klosterhoff; Hazel Y Stevens; Lisa Tran; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Combination of BMP2 and EZH2 Inhibition to Stimulate Osteogenesis in a 3D Bone Reconstruction Model.

Authors:  Hayman Lui; Rebekah M Samsonraj; Cedryck Vaquette; Janet Denbeigh; Sanjeev Kakar; Simon M Cool; Amel Dudakovic; Andre J van Wijnen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.080

Review 7.  Formulation, Delivery and Stability of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins for Effective Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Inas El Bialy; Wim Jiskoot; M Reza Nejadnik
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Chondroitin Sulfate Glycosaminoglycan Scaffolds for Cell and Recombinant Protein-Based Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Seth Andrews; Albert Cheng; Hazel Stevens; Meghan T Logun; Robin Webb; Erin Jordan; Boao Xia; Lohitash Karumbaiah; Robert E Guldberg; Steven Stice
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 6.940

9.  Functionalized Scaffold and Barrier Membrane with Anti-BMP-2 Monoclonal Antibodies for Alveolar Ridge Preservation in a Canine Model.

Authors:  Seiko Min; Taewan Kim; Oksu Kim; Carames Goncalo; Tadahiko Utsunomiya; Takashi Matsumoto; Kayo Kuyama; Nikola Angelov
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Rat model of an autologous cancellous bone graft.

Authors:  Tomo Hamada; Hidenori Matsubara; Toshifumi Hikichi; Kanu Shimokawa; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.