Literature DB >> 18757731

Mate choice for more melanin as a mechanism to maintain a functional oncogene.

André A Fernandez1, Molly R Morris.   

Abstract

The mechanisms by which cancer evolves and persists in natural systems have been difficult to ascertain. In the Xiphophorus melanoma model, a functional oncogene (Xiphophorus melanoma receptor kinase Xmrk) has been maintained for several million years despite being deleterious and in an extremely unstable genomic region. Melanomas in Xiphophorus spp. fishes (platyfishes and swordtails) have been investigated since the 1920s, and, yet, positive selection that could explain the maintenance of Xmrk has not been found. Here, we show that Xiphophorus cortezi females from two populations prefer males with the spotted caudal (Sc) melanin pattern, which is associated with the presence of the Xmrk oncogene and serves as the site of melanoma formation within this species. Moreover, X. cortezi females prefer males with an enhanced Sc to males with a reduced Sc pattern. RT-PCR analysis confirms tissue-specific Xmrk expression within the Sc pattern in X. cortezi. Because of the association of Xmrk with the Sc pigment pattern and the fact that melanoma formation augments this visual signal, sexual selection appears to be maintaining this oncogene because of a mating preference for Sc, as well as the exaggeration of this male trait. At the individual level, decreases in viability and fecundity because of Xmrk and subsequent melanoma formation may be mitigated via increases in mate acquisition. At the population level, maintenance of this oncogene appears to be under frequency dependent selection, as we detected female preference for males without Sc in a third population that had higher frequencies of Sc in females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18757731      PMCID: PMC2533219          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803851105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  21 in total

1.  Phylogenetic analysis of sexual dimorphism and eye-span allometry in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae).

Authors:  R H Baker; G S Wilkinson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Evolution of coadaptation in a two-locus epistatic system.

Authors:  K Ryo Takahasi; Fumio Tajima
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The androgen receptor and prostate cancer: a role for sexual selection and sexual conflict?

Authors:  Kyle Summers; Bernard Crespi
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 1.538

4.  Sex and differentiation: population genetic divergence and sexual dimorphism in Mexican goodeid fish.

Authors:  M G Ritchie; R M Hamill; J A Graves; A E Magurran; S A Webb; C Macías Garcia
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection.

Authors:  J A Endler; A L Basolo
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Human placental trophoblast as an in vitro model for tumor progression.

Authors:  P K Lala; B P Lee; G Xu; C Chakraborty
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  Detection of sex-region Y (SRY) transcripts in human prostate adenocarcinoma and benign prostatic hypertrophy.

Authors:  J V Tricoli; J L Yao; S A D'Souza; R B Bracken
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  The macromelanophore locus and the melanoma oncogene Xmrk are separate genetic entities in the genome of Xiphophorus.

Authors:  S Weis; M Schartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  25 in total

1.  Transitions between male and female heterogamety caused by sex-antagonistic selection.

Authors:  G Sander van Doorn; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Selection for a dominant oncogene and large male size as a risk factor for melanoma in the Xiphophorus animal model.

Authors:  André A Fernandez; Paul R Bowser
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Why does allometry evolve so slowly?

Authors:  David Houle; Luke T Jones; Ryan Fortune; Jacqueline L Sztepanacz
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 4.  The dynamic relationship between polyandry and selfish genetic elements.

Authors:  Nina Wedell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Patterns and mechanisms of evolutionary transitions between genetic sex-determining systems.

Authors:  G Sander van Doorn
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  Signatures of sex-antagonistic selection on recombining sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Rafael F Guerrero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Assortative mating and persistent reproductive isolation in hybrids.

Authors:  Molly Schumer; Daniel L Powell; Pablo J Delclós; Mattie Squire; Rongfeng Cui; Peter Andolfatto; Gil G Rosenthal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Natural hybridization reveals incompatible alleles that cause melanoma in swordtail fish.

Authors:  Daniel L Powell; Mateo García-Olazábal; Mackenzie Keegan; Patrick Reilly; Kang Du; Alejandra P Díaz-Loyo; Shreya Banerjee; Danielle Blakkan; David Reich; Peter Andolfatto; Gil G Rosenthal; Manfred Schartl; Molly Schumer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Not just black and white: pigment pattern development and evolution in vertebrates.

Authors:  Margaret G Mills; Larissa B Patterson
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 10.  Genetic and environmental melanoma models in fish.

Authors:  E Elizabeth Patton; David L Mitchell; Rodney S Nairn
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 4.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.