Literature DB >> 18757332

Pharmacodynamic-guided modified continuous reassessment method-based, dose-finding study of rapamycin in adult patients with solid tumors.

Antonio Jimeno1, Michelle A Rudek, Peter Kulesza, Wen Wee Ma, Jenna Wheelhouse, Anna Howard, Yasmin Khan, Ming Zhao, Heather Jacene, Wells A Messersmith, Daniel Laheru, Ross C Donehower, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Sharyn D Baker, Manuel Hidalgo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pharmacodynamic studies are frequently incorporated into phase I trials, but it is uncommon that they guide dose selection. We conducted a dose selection study with daily rapamycin (sirolimus) in patients with solid tumors employing a modified continuous reassessment method (mCRM) using real-time pharmacodynamic data as primary dose-estimation parameter. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We adapted the mCRM logit function from its classic toxicity-based input data to a pharmacodynamic-based input. The pharmacodynamic end point was skin phospho-P70 change after 28 days. Pharmacodynamic effect was defined as at least 80% inhibition from baseline. The first two dose levels (2 and 3 mg) were evaluated before implementing the mCRM, and the data used to estimate the next dose level based on statistical modeling. Toxicity-based boundaries limited the escalation steps. Other correlates analyzed were positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography, pharmacokinetics, phospho-P70 in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells, and tumor biopsies in patients at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD).
RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled at doses between 2 and 9 mg. Pharmacodynamic effect occurred across dose levels, and toxicity boundaries ultimately drove dose selection. The MTD of daily oral rapamycin was 6 mg. Toxicities in at least 20% were hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, elevated transaminases, anemia, leucopenia, neutropenia, and mucositis. Pharmacokinetics were consistent with prior data, and exposure increased with dose. No objective responses occurred, but five previously progressing patients received at least 12 cycles. PET showed generalized stable or decreased glucose uptake unrelated to antitumor effect.
CONCLUSION: mCRM-based dose escalation using real-time pharmacodynamic assessment was feasible. However, the selected pharmacodynamic end point did not correlate with dose. Toxicity ultimately drove dose selection. Rapamycin is a well-tolerated and active oral anticancer agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18757332      PMCID: PMC2654371          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.2347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  18 in total

Review 1.  TOR, a central controller of cell growth.

Authors:  T Schmelzle; M N Hall
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Rapamycin's resurrection: a new way to target the cancer cell cycle.

Authors:  K Garber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-10-17       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  TOR signalling and control of cell growth.

Authors:  G Thomas; M N Hall
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 8.382

5.  Practical implementation of a modified continual reassessment method for dose-finding trials.

Authors:  S Piantadosi; J D Fisher; S Grossman
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Biochemical correlates of mTOR inhibition by the rapamycin ester CCI-779 and tumor growth inhibition.

Authors:  L Dudkin; M B Dilling; P J Cheshire; F C Harwood; M Hollingshead; S G Arbuck; R Travis; E A Sausville; P J Houghton
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in stable renal transplant patients after multiple oral dose administration.

Authors:  J J Zimmerman; B D Kahan
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.126

8.  A worldwide, phase III, randomized, controlled, safety and efficacy study of a sirolimus/cyclosporine regimen for prevention of acute rejection in recipients of primary mismatched renal allografts.

Authors:  A S MacDonald
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2001-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of CCI-779, an Inhibitor of mTOR, in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Josep Maria Peralba; Linda DeGraffenried; William Friedrichs; Letitia Fulcher; Viktor Grünwald; Geoffrey Weiss; Manuel Hidalgo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Two-year results of multicenter phase III trials on the effect of the addition of sirolimus to cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation.

Authors:  B D Kahan
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.066

View more
  31 in total

1.  High-dose rapamycin induces apoptosis in human cancer cells by dissociating mTOR complex 1 and suppressing phosphorylation of 4E-BP1.

Authors:  Paige Yellen; Mahesh Saqcena; Darin Salloum; Jiangnan Feng; Angela Preda; Limei Xu; Vanessa Rodrik-Outmezguine; David A Foster
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  mTOR as a molecular target in HPV-associated oral and cervical squamous carcinomas.

Authors:  Alfredo A Molinolo; Christina Marsh; Mohamed El Dinali; Nitin Gangane; Kaitlin Jennison; Stephen Hewitt; Vyomesh Patel; Tanguy Y Seiwert; J Silvio Gutkind
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Synergistic activity of rapamycin and dexamethasone in vitro and in vivo in acute lymphoblastic leukemia via cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis.

Authors:  Chong Zhang; Yong-Ku Ryu; Taylor Z Chen; Connor P Hall; Daniel R Webster; Min H Kang
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 3.156

4.  A pharmacodynamic study of rapamycin in men with intermediate- to high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Armstrong; George J Netto; Michelle A Rudek; Susan Halabi; David P Wood; Patricia A Creel; Kelly Mundy; S Lindsay Davis; Ting Wang; Roula Albadine; Luciana Schultz; Alan W Partin; Antonio Jimeno; Helen Fedor; Phillip G Febbo; Daniel J George; Robin Gurganus; Angelo M De Marzo; Michael A Carducci
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  The Enigma of Rapamycin Dosage.

Authors:  Suman Mukhopadhyay; Maria A Frias; Amrita Chatterjee; Paige Yellen; David A Foster
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  Phase I studies of sirolimus alone or in combination with pharmacokinetic modulators in advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  Ezra E W Cohen; Kehua Wu; Christine Hartford; Masha Kocherginsky; Kimberly Napoli Eaton; Yuanyuan Zha; Anitha Nallari; Michael L Maitland; Kammi Fox-Kay; Kristin Moshier; Larry House; Jacqueline Ramirez; Samir D Undevia; Gini F Fleming; Thomas F Gajewski; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Exposure-response relationship of AMG 386 in combination with weekly paclitaxel in recurrent ovarian cancer and its implication for dose selection.

Authors:  Jian-Feng Lu; Erik Rasmussen; Beth Y Karlan; Ignace B Vergote; Lynn Navale; Mita Kuchimanchi; Rebeca Melara; Daniel E Stepan; David M Weinreich; Yu-Nien Sun
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 8.  Exploiting novel molecular targets in gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Wen W Ma; Manuel Hidalgo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Rapamycin pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships in osteosarcoma: a comparative oncology study in dogs.

Authors:  Melissa C Paoloni; Christina Mazcko; Elizabeth Fox; Timothy Fan; Susan Lana; William Kisseberth; David M Vail; Kaylee Nuckolls; Tanasa Osborne; Samuel Yalkowsy; Daniel Gustafson; Yunkai Yu; Liang Cao; Chand Khanna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography correlates with Akt pathway activity but is not predictive of clinical outcome during mTOR inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  Wen Wee Ma; Heather Jacene; Dongweon Song; Felip Vilardell; Wells A Messersmith; Dan Laheru; Richard Wahl; Chris Endres; Antonio Jimeno; Martin G Pomper; Manuel Hidalgo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.