Literature DB >> 11213073

A worldwide, phase III, randomized, controlled, safety and efficacy study of a sirolimus/cyclosporine regimen for prevention of acute rejection in recipients of primary mismatched renal allografts.

A S MacDonald1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the various immunosuppressive regimens presently in use, acute rejection in the early postoperative period continues to occur in 20 to 40% of renal transplant patients. In a double-blind, multicentred study, we investigated the ability of two different doses of sirolimus (rapamycin, RAPAMUNE), a new class of immunosuppressant that blocks cell cycle progression, to prevent acute rejection in recipients of primary mismatched renal allografts when added to a regimen of cyclosporine (cyclosporin A, CsA) and corticosteroids.
METHODS: Between October 1996 and September 1997, 576 recipients of primary mismatched cadaveric or living donor renal allografts were randomly assigned in a 2:2:1 ratio (before the transplant operation) to receive an initial loading dose of either 6 or 15 mg of orally administered sirolimus, followed by a daily dose of either 2 or 5 mg/day, or to receive a matched placebo. All groups received cyclosporine (microemulsion formula, CsA) and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was a composite of first occurrence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, or death during the first 6 months after transplantation. Safety data were monitored by an independent drug safety monitoring board.
RESULTS: Based on an intention-to-treat analysis of 576 patients, there were no significant differences in patient demographic or baseline characteristics among treatment groups. The overall rate of the primary composite endpoint for the 6-month period after transplantation was 30.0% (68/227) in the 2 mg/day sirolimus group and 25.6% (56/219) in the 5 mg/day sirolimus group, significantly lower than the 47.7% (62/130) in the placebo group (P=0.002, P<0.001, respectively). During this period, the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was 24.7% (56/227) in the 2 mg/day sirolimus group and 19.2% (42/219) in the 5 mg/day sirolimus group, compared with 41.5% (54/130) in the placebo group (P=0.003, P<0.001, respectively), representing a significant reduction in acute rejection of 40.5 and 53.7%, respectively. The need for antibody therapy to treat the first episode of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was significantly reduced in the 5 mg/ day sirolimus group (3.2%) compared to the placebo group (8.5%; P=0.044). The results 1 year after transplantation were similar for the efficacy parameters studied. Adverse events and infections occurred in all groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of either 2 mg/day sirolimus or 5 mg/day sirolimus to CsA/corticosteroid therapy significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes in primary mismatched renal allograft recipients, without an increase in immunosuppressant-related side effects, including infections and malignancy, at 6 months and at 1 year after transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11213073     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200101270-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  75 in total

1.  [New immunosuppressive agents for treating psoriasis].

Authors:  S Ortiz-Urda; K Rappersberger
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  New and Emerging Targeted Therapies for Vascular Malformations.

Authors:  An Van Damme; Emmanuel Seront; Valérie Dekeuleneer; Laurence M Boon; Miikka Vikkula
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 7.403

Review 3.  Induction therapy in renal transplantation : an overview of current developments.

Authors:  Gaetano Ciancio; George W Burke; Joshua Miller
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Treatment of severe aplastic anemia with a combination of horse antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine, with or without sirolimus: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Phillip Scheinberg; Colin O Wu; Olga Nunez; Priscila Scheinberg; Carol Boss; Elaine M Sloand; Neal S Young
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  Current state of renal transplant immunosuppression: Present and future.

Authors:  Hari Varun Kalluri; Karen L Hardinger
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2012-08-24

6.  Population pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in de novo Chinese adult renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Zheng Jiao; Xiao-jin Shi; Zhong-dong Li; Ming-kang Zhong
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  What is the impact of immunosuppressive treatment on the post-transplant renal osteopathy?

Authors:  Kristina Blaslov; Lea Katalinic; Petar Kes; Goce Spasovski; Ruzica Smalcelj; Nikolina Basic-Jukic
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Gonadal dysfunction and infertility in kidney transplant patients receiving sirolimus.

Authors:  Yousef Boobes; Bassam Bernieh; Hussein Saadi; M Raafat Al Hakim; Samra Abouchacra
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 9.  mTOR inhibitors and renal allograft: Yin and Yang.

Authors:  Gianluigi Zaza; Simona Granata; Paola Tomei; Valentina Masola; Giovanni Gambaro; Antonio Lupo
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 10.  Differentiating the mTOR inhibitors everolimus and sirolimus in the treatment of tuberous sclerosis complex.

Authors:  Jeffrey P MacKeigan; Darcy A Krueger
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.