| Literature DB >> 18754816 |
Chuan-Bao Li1, Xiao-Xing Li, Yu-Guo Chen, Cheng Zhang, Ming-Xiang Zhang, Xue-Qiang Zhao, Ming-Xiu Hao, Xiao-Yang Hou, Mao-Lei Gong, Yu-Xia Zhao, Pei-Li Bu, Yun Zhang.
Abstract
Although peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) is highly expressed in the heart, the effects of PPARalpha on cardiac remodelling and the underlying mechanisms are unclear. The present study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that PPARalpha activator fenofibrate plays a key role in left ventricular hypertrophic remodelling via the formation of c-fos/c-jun heterodimers in spontaneous hypertensive rats (SHRs). Twenty-four male 8-week-old SHRs were randomly divided into two groups, one group treated with oral saline (n= 10) and another treated with oral fenofibrate (60 mg.kg-1.d-1, n= 14). Ten same-aged Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats were selected as a normal control group. Using echocardiography, immunohistochemistry, co-immunoprecipitation, Western blot analysis and real-time RT-PCR, we showed that the left ventricular wall thickness and significantly reduced and left ventricular diastolic function improved in SHRs treated with fenofibrate compared with SHRs treated with saline. Similarly, the excessive collagen deposition and the up-regulation of collagen I, collagen III, c-fos and c-jun seen in SHRs receiving saline were significantly attenuated in SHRs receiving fenofibrate. In addition, fenofibrate markedly decreased the expression of AP-1 and c-fos/c-jun heterodimers (P < 0.01). These results demonstrated that PPARalpha activator fenofibrate may exert a protective effect on cardiac remodelling in SHRs by decreasing the expression of c-fos and c-jun and suppressing the formation of c-fos/c-jun heterodimers, which may further inhibit transcription of the downstream genes involved in the pathogenesis of left ventricular hypertrophy induced by hypertension.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 18754816 PMCID: PMC4515060 DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00484.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Characteristics of three groups of rats at week 1 and week 8
| Week 1 | Week 8 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WKY | SHR + saline | SHR + fenofibrate | WKY | SHR + saline | SHR + fenofibrate | |
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | |
| HR (bpm) | 459.50 ± 23.45 | 433.38 ± 36.80 | 449.20 ± 43.51 | 437.25 ± 33.98 | 417.00 ± 38.56 | 424.40 ± 35.63 |
| BW (g) | 241.60 ± 13.40 | 198.38 ± 12.64 | 204.61 ± 9.03 | 360.98 ± 18.27 | 300.95 ± 14.02 | 305.47 ± 17.61 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 93.13 ± 1.81 | 165.80 ± 5.06 | 164.03 ± 4.51 | 114.69 ± 2.70 | 211.06 ± 5.65 | 212.05 ± 7.85 |
| HW/BW (mg/g) | 2.19 ± 0.13 | 2.95 ± 0.15 | 2.36 ± 0.10 | |||
BW: body weight;
HW: heart weight;
HR: heart rate;
bmp: beats per minute;
SBP: systolic blood pressure.
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 versus WKY group,
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 versus SHR + saline group,
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 versus week 1 data.
Echocardiographic measurements in three groups of rats at week 1 and week 8
| Week 1 | Week 8 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WKY | SHR + saline | SHR + fenofibrate | WKY | SHR + saline | SHR + fenofibrate | |
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | |
| IVSTd (mm) | 1.34 ± 0.02 | 1.75 ± 0.06 | 1.69 ± 0.08 | 1.82 ± 0.10 | 2.60 ± 0.34 | 2.07 ± 0.22 |
| LVPWTd (mm) | 1.33 ± 0.04 | 1.66 ± 0.05 | 1.69 ± 0.07 | 1.84 ± 0.07 | 2.49 ± 0.24 | 1.96 ± 0.15 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 4.21 ± 0.30 | 4.24 ± 0.50 | 4.44 ± 0.39 | 4.76 ± 0.10 | 4.92 ± 0.67 | 5.04 ± 0.30 |
| LVESD (mm) | 1.75 ± 0.11 | 1.77 ± 0.18 | 1.79 ± 0.16 | 2.01 ± 0.20 | 2.13 ± 0.36 | 2.04 ± 0.24 |
| RWT | 0.63 ± 0.05 | 0.79 ± 0.09 | 0.77 ± 0.07 | 0.77 ± 0.03 | 1.04 ± 0.29 | 0.79 ± 0.09 |
| LVFS | 0.59 ± 0.03 | 0.58 ± 0.02 | 0.60 ± 0.05 | 0.58 ± 0.04 | 0.58 ± 0.04 | 0.59 ± 0.07 |
| LVEF | 91.15 ± 4.02 | 90.55 ± 3.11 | 89.63 ± 4.04 | 89.78 ± 3.51 | 87.69 ± 4.45 | 87.81 ± 4.15 |
| E-wave (cm/sec.) | 81.59 ± 12.87 | 80.49 ± 13.77 | 79.48 ± 18.03 | 81.81 ± 10.10 | 82.58 ± 16.84 | 83.11 ± 15.53 |
| A-wave (cm/sec.) | 45.32 ± 7.29 | 47.09 ± 9.03 | 45.75 ± 11.51 | 45.20 ± 7.26 | 61.84 ± 13.50 | 48.34 ± 10.69 |
| E/A | 1.82 ± 0.07 | 1.72 ± 0.07 | 1.75 ± 0.11 | 1.84 ± 0.08 | 1.34 ± 0.05 | 1.74 ± 0.13 |
| DT (sec.) | 37.08 ± 2.52 | 37.29 ± 1.55 | 37.87 ± 3.23 | 38.46 ± 2.49 | 43.25 ± 3.35 | 38.93 ± 3.20 |
| IBS%LVPWd | 0.27 ± 0.03 | 0.30 ± 0.06 | 0.34 ± 0.07 | 0.30 ± 0.05 | 0.50 ± 0.09 | 0.37 ± 0.07 |
| CVIBLVPWd (dB) | 7.78 ± 1.38 | 6.58 ± 1.13 | 6.35 ± 1.49 | 6.96 ± 1.49 | 4.53 ± 0.80 | 6.08 ± 0.77 |
| IBS%IVS | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 0.41 ± 0.05 | 0.44 ± 0.08 | 0.42 ± 0.06 | 0.58 ± 0.12 | 0.46 ± 0.09 |
| CVIBIVS (dB) | 8.38 ± 1.57 | 7.53 ± 1.43 | 6.91 ± 1.12 | 7.68 ± 1.25 | 5.22 ± 0.95 | 6.83 ± 1.14 |
IVSTd: interventricular septal wall thickness
LVPWTd: left ventricular posterior wall thickness
IVSTd: interventricular septal wall thickness
LVPWTd: left ventricular posterior wall thickness
LVEDD: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter
LVESD: left ventricular end-systolic diameter
RWT: relative wall thickness
LVFS: left ventricular fractional shortening
LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction
E/A: ratio of E wave to A wave velocities
DT: deceleration time of E wave velocities
IBS: integrated backscatter
CVIB: cyclic variation of IBS
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 versus WKY group,
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 versus SHR + saline group,
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 versus week 1 data.
Hemodynamic indices measured at week 8 in three groups of rats
| Groups | LVEDP (mmHg) | +dp/dtmax (mmHg/sec.) | −dp/dtmax(mmHg/sec.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| WKY ( | 5.33 ± 1.51 | 3671 ± 578 | 3446 ± 190 |
| SHR + saline ( | 10.48 ± 2.69 | 2748 ± 404 | 2727 ± 399 |
| SHR + fenofibrate ( | 7.33 ± 2.17 | 3553 ± 419 | 3141 ± 313 |
LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure;
dP/dt, change in left ventricular pressure over time;
P < 0.01 versus WKY group,
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 versus SHR + saline group.
Figure 1Representative myocardial ultrastructure of the left ventricle in three groups of rats. (A) A cardiac myocyte in a WKY rat showing normal quantity and distribution of extracellular collagen fibres (8000×). (B) A cardiac myocyte in an SHR treated with saline exhibited excessive deposition of collagen fibres in extracellular matrix (8000×). (C) A cardiac myocyte in an SHR treated with fenofibrate showed approximately normal configuration of the collagen fibres (8000×). Arrows indicate collagen fibres.
Figure 2Quantitation of histology of myocardial tissues after Masson staining. Top panel: (A) Myocardial histology in a WKY rat showing normal quantity and distribution of collagen fibres (400×). (B) Myocardial histology in an SHR treated with saline showing hyperplastic and disorganized collagen fibres (400×). (C) Myocardial histology in an SHR treated with fenofibrate demonstrating almost normal appearance of collagen fibres (400×). Bottom panel: comparison of relative content of collagen in three groups of rats. Data shown were means ± S.E.M. (WKY: n= 10, SHR + saline: n= 10, SHR + fenofibrate: n= 12). **P < 0.01 versus WKY group, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 versus SHR + saline group.
Figure 3Representative immunohistochemical nuclei staining for c-fos (A, B, C) and c-jun (D, E, F) in the myocardium of three groups of rats. (A and D) c-fos and c-jun staining in WKY rats showing scanty nuclear-positive cells; (B and E) c-fos and c-jun staining in SHRs treated with saline showing a large number of nuclear-positive cells; (C and F) c-fos and c-jun staining in SHRs treated with fenofibrate depicting significantly a small number of nuclear-positive cells (magnification, 400×). Arrows indicate nuclear-positive cells.
Figure 4mRNA expression of PPARα, c-fos, c-jun and type I and III collagen in the myocardium of three groups of rats. Data shown were means ± S.E.M. (WKY: n= 10, SHR + saline: n= 10, SHR + fenofibrate: n= 12). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus WKY group, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 versus SHR + saline group.
Figure 5Top panel: Western blot analysis of AP-1 total (A) and nuclear (B) proteins and Western blot analysis of co-immunoprecipitation of c-jun/c-fos heterodimers (C) in the myocardium of three groups of rats (WKY group n= 10, SHR + saline group n= 10, SHR + fenofibrate group n= 12). Bottom panel: Bar graph showing mean ± S.E.M. of Western blot analysis. **P < 0.01 versus WKY group. ##P < 0.01 versus SHR + saline group.