Literature DB >> 1875415

Randomized trial of doxorubicin, bisantrene, and mitoxantrone in advanced breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

J D Cowan1, J Neidhart, S McClure, C A Coltman, C Gumbart, S Martino, L F Hutchins, R L Stephens, C B Vaughan, C K Osborne.   

Abstract

Four hundred eleven women with metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either 60 mg/m2 doxorubicin (130 patients), 320 mg/m2 bisantrene (146 patients), or 14 mg/m2 mitoxantrone (135 patients). The doses were given intravenously every 3 weeks with a cross-over design to determine their relative efficacy and toxicity. To be eligible, patients must have had one previous chemotherapy regimen, and patients who were estrogen receptor positive must have failed endocrine therapy. There were 365 patients assessable for response and 399 assessable for toxic effects. The median age was 57 years; 18% were premenopausal or perimenopausal. Visceral dominant disease was present in 66% of the patients. Ninety-seven percent of the patients had a disease-free interval from diagnosis to first recurrence of less than 1 year. The response rate was 28% with doxorubicin, 13% with bisantrene, and 14% with mitoxantrone (P = .004). Median time to treatment failure was 133 days with doxorubicin, 66 days with bisantrene, and 68 days with mitoxantrone (logrank P = .06). The median survival was 315 days for doxorubicin, 290 days for bisantrene, and 177 days for mitoxantrone (logrank P = .04), although survival at 2 years was similar for all three agents. There were five responses in the 66 patients crossed over to doxorubicin and one response each for patients crossed over to bisantrene (39 patients) or mitoxantrone (63 patients). Toxicity leading to discontinuance of therapy was more common with doxorubicin, and discontinuance of therapy was due primarily to patient's request or cardiotoxicity. The major dose-limiting toxic effect for all three agents was leukopenia. Nausea and vomiting, mucositis, and alopecia were more severe with doxorubicin. Congestive heart failure developed in nine patients treated with doxorubicin, zero patients treated with bisantrene, and two patients treated with mitoxantrone. A decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction, as defined by moderate to severe Alexander grade changes, was more common in patients treated with doxorubicin (doxorubicin-treated patients = 20%, bisantrene-treated patients = 5%, and mitoxantrone-treated patients = 10%). This study demonstrates that bisantrene and mitoxantrone have only modest activity in metastatic breast carcinoma. The activity of doxorubicin is greater than that of the other two agents, but at a cost of increased toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1875415     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/83.15.1077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  12 in total

Review 1.  Granisetron in the control of radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a comparison with other antiemetic therapies.

Authors:  Petra Feyer; M Heinrich Seegenschmiedt; Maria Steingraeber
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Mitoxantrone. A review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of hormone-resistant advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Advanced breast cancer: a randomized study of doxorubicin or mitoxantrone in combination with cyclophosphamide and vincristine.

Authors:  J A Green; A J Slater; I R Campbell; V Kelly
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Does induction chemotherapy with a mitoxantrone/vinorelbine regimen allow a breast-conservative treatment in patients with operable locoregional breast cancer? A French Northern Oncology Group trial in 105 patients. French Northern Oncology Group.

Authors:  A Adenis; L Vanlemmens; C Fournier; B Hecquet; J Bonneterre
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity in survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Barry H Trachtenberg; David C Landy; Vivian I Franco; Jacqueline M Henkel; Elliot J Pearson; Tracie L Miller; Steven E Lipshultz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Phase I trial of mitoxantrone and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

Authors:  J H Schiller; B Storer; R Arzoomanian; K Tutsch; D Alberti; D Spriggs
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  Phase II trial of doxorubicin and trifluoperazine in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  G T Budd; R M Bukowski; A Lichtin; L Bauer; P Van Kirk; R Ganapathi
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 8.  Factors influencing the choice of 5-HT3-receptor antagonist antiemetics: focus on elderly cancer patients.

Authors:  Cesare Gridelli; Matti Aapro
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Phase II evaluation of mitoxantrone plus cis-platinum in patients with advanced breast cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Authors:  J O Atiba; S J Green; H E Hynes; C K Osborne; T P Miller; M Davidner
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  A phase III randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) versus cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  M C Alonso; J M Tabernero; B Ojeda; M Llanos; C Solà; M A Climent; M A Seguí; J J López
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.