PURPOSE: To determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of high-dose mitoxantrone and document the toxicities and side effects of mitoxantrone when administered with GM-CSF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with advanced solid tumors were entered into a phase I and pharmacokinetic study. Mitoxantrone was administered at doses of 12, 21, 28, 32, 37, and 48 mg/m2 on day 1; GM-CSF (5 micrograms/kg once or twice daily) was administered on days 2 to 14. Therapy was repeated every 3 weeks. Dose escalation continued in sets of three patients until the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. The DLT was based on hematologic, non-hematologic, and cardiac toxicity, and delay of therapy by more than 1 week due to toxicity. Plasma samples were assayed for mitoxantrone concentrations using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS: Twelve patients required either mitoxantrone dose reductions or delays. DLT of neutropenia was observed at a mitoxantrone dose of 48 mg/m2/day. Therefore, we conclude the MTD was 37 mg/m2/day. Myelosuppression appeared to be cumulative. Two patients were withdrawn from the study due to a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Two of 23 patients experienced a partial response. The mean area under the curve (AUC) and peak mitoxantrone levels increased linearly with dose; triexponential elimination of mitoxantrone was observed. No statistically significant correlation was observed between either peak mitoxantrone level or AUC and duration of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 500/mm3. CONCLUSION: The use of GM-CSF allows administration of mitoxantrone at a dose greater than three times that given in standard therapy; treatment is well tolerated. Further studies are needed to determine whether mitoxantrone has cumulative cardiac or hematologic toxicity.
PURPOSE: To determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of high-dose mitoxantrone and document the toxicities and side effects of mitoxantrone when administered with GM-CSF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with advanced solid tumors were entered into a phase I and pharmacokinetic study. Mitoxantrone was administered at doses of 12, 21, 28, 32, 37, and 48 mg/m2 on day 1; GM-CSF (5 micrograms/kg once or twice daily) was administered on days 2 to 14. Therapy was repeated every 3 weeks. Dose escalation continued in sets of three patients until the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. The DLT was based on hematologic, non-hematologic, and cardiac toxicity, and delay of therapy by more than 1 week due to toxicity. Plasma samples were assayed for mitoxantrone concentrations using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS: Twelve patients required either mitoxantrone dose reductions or delays. DLT of neutropenia was observed at a mitoxantrone dose of 48 mg/m2/day. Therefore, we conclude the MTD was 37 mg/m2/day. Myelosuppression appeared to be cumulative. Two patients were withdrawn from the study due to a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Two of 23 patients experienced a partial response. The mean area under the curve (AUC) and peak mitoxantrone levels increased linearly with dose; triexponential elimination of mitoxantrone was observed. No statistically significant correlation was observed between either peak mitoxantrone level or AUC and duration of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 500/mm3. CONCLUSION: The use of GM-CSF allows administration of mitoxantrone at a dose greater than three times that given in standard therapy; treatment is well tolerated. Further studies are needed to determine whether mitoxantrone has cumulative cardiac or hematologic toxicity.
Authors: K M Taylor; S Jagannath; G Spitzer; J A Spinolo; S L Tucker; B Fogel; F F Cabanillas; F B Hagemeister; L M Souza Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1989-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J M Bennett; H B Muss; J H Doroshow; S Wolff; E T Krementz; K Cartwright; G Dukart; A Reisman; I Schoch Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1988-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J M Tourani; R Levy; P Colonna; B Desablens; P Y Leprise; F Guilhot; S Brahimi; M Belhani; N Ifrah; L Sensebe Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1992-07 Impact factor: 44.544