Literature DB >> 18753891

Whole bone geometry and bone quality in distal forearm fracture.

Ian H Parkinson1, Nicola L Fazzalari.   

Abstract

Fracture of the distal radius is a sentinel for future increased risk of other "osteoporotic" fractures, in which the peak age for incidence of distal radius fracture is 5 to 10 years before that for spine and hip fractures. Mean bone mineral density (BMD) of the distal radius was lower in patients with osteoporosis compared with age- and sex-matched normal subjects. However, it has been shown that to predict the strength of the distal radius at the site where fractures occur requires more than measurement of bone mineral content (BMC) or BMD. Only moderate correlations have been found between forearm sites, which may be a result of differences in bone composition between sites. Different forearm sites may be used interchangeably for diagnostic purposes, but the prognostic value is not known. Using the distal radius as a screening tool for identifying individuals at risk of "osteoporotic" fracture shows that forearm site selection and accuracy of measurement can be important confounders in group studies.Improving resolution of computed tomography (CT) scanners has enabled quantitation of cortical bone density and cortical thickness. These measurements have enabled the mechanism of bone loss in the distal radius to be elucidated and show that, after menopause, bone loss is primarily through thinning of the cortex. CT imaging allows the precise localization of bone changes in individuals and should be of value in the assessment of the severity of osteoporosis. It also shows that this technology has the potential to determine the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. A concerted effort has been made to elucidate the interrelationships between the amount of bone and the geometry and that clinical imaging of BMC and/or cross-sectional area in the radius would provide improved prediction of an individual's risk of fracture.The technological tools are available, in the clinic, to accurately measure the 3-dimensional (3D) geometry of the distal radius and the amount of bone. In addition, the cortical and cancellous bone compartments can be analyzed separately. This capability, along with the easy accessibility of the distal radius to clinical imaging modalities, provides an excellent framework for longitudinal prospective studies to determine morphologic risk factors for osteoporotic fractures of the distal radius.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18753891     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318162ab25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  4 in total

Review 1.  Surgical treatment options in patients with impaired bone quality.

Authors:  Norman A Johanson; Jody Litrenta; Jay M Zampini; Frederic Kleinbart; Haviva M Goldman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  BoneJ: Free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ.

Authors:  Michael Doube; Michał M Kłosowski; Ignacio Arganda-Carreras; Fabrice P Cordelières; Robert P Dougherty; Jonathan S Jackson; Benjamin Schmid; John R Hutchinson; Sandra J Shefelbine
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Bench-to-bedside strategies for osteoporotic fracture: From osteoimmunology to mechanosensation.

Authors:  Yong Xie; Licheng Zhang; Qi Xiong; Yanpan Gao; Wei Ge; Peifu Tang
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 13.567

4.  Combining areal DXA bone mineral density and vertebrae postero-anterior width improves the prediction of vertebral strength.

Authors:  Grzegorz Tatoń; Eugeniusz Rokita; Andrzej Wróbel; Mariusz Korkosz
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.