Literature DB >> 18752399

Sequence learning is preserved in individuals with cerebellar degeneration when the movements are directly cued.

Rebecca M C Spencer1, Richard B Ivry.   

Abstract

Cerebellar pathology is associated with impairments on a range of motor learning tasks including sequence learning. However, various lines of evidence are at odds with the idea that the cerebellum plays a central role in the associative processes underlying sequence learning. Behavioral studies indicate that sequence learning, at least with short periods of practice, involves the establishment of effector-independent, abstract spatial associations, a form of representation not associated with cerebellar function. Moreover, neuroimaging studies have failed to identify learning-related changes within the cerebellum. We hypothesize that the cerebellar contribution to sequence learning may be indirect, related to the maintenance of stimulus-response associations in working memory, rather than through processes directly involved in the formation of sequential predictions. Consistent with this hypothesis, individuals with cerebellar pathology were impaired in learning movement sequences when the task involved a demanding stimulus-response translation. When this translation process was eliminated by having the stimuli directly indicate the response location, the cerebellar ataxia group demonstrated normal sequence learning. This dissociation provides an important constraint on the functional domain of the cerebellum in motor learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18752399      PMCID: PMC4330994          DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  36 in total

1.  Experience-dependent changes in cerebellar contributions to motor sequence learning.

Authors:  Julien Doyon; Allen W Song; Avi Karni; Francois Lalonde; Michelle M Adams; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Joern Diedrichsen; Steven W Kennerley; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2002-11-26

3.  The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation.

Authors:  Steven W Keele; Richard Ivry; Ulrich Mayr; Eliot Hazeltine; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans.

Authors:  S T Grafton; E Hazeltine; R Ivry
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets.

Authors:  Neil B Albert; Matthias Weigelt; Eliot Hazeltine; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Motor deficits cannot explain impaired cognitive associative learning in cerebellar patients.

Authors:  Dagmar Timmann; J Drepper; M Maschke; F P Kolb; D Böring; A F Thilmann; H C Diener
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Cerebellum and procedural learning: evidence from focal cerebellar lesions.

Authors:  M Molinari; M G Leggio; A Solida; R Ciorra; S Misciagna; M C Silveri; L Petrosini
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Cerebellar involvement in response reassignment rather than attention.

Authors:  Amanda Bischoff-Grethe; Richard B Ivry; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation.

Authors:  T A Martin; J G Keating; H P Goodkin; A J Bastian; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Cerebellum activation associated with performance change but not motor learning.

Authors:  R D Seidler; A Purushotham; S-G Kim; K Uğurbil; D Willingham; J Ashe
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  16 in total

1.  Symbolic representations in motor sequence learning.

Authors:  J Bo; S J Peltier; D C Noll; R D Seidler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The cerebellum does more than sensory prediction error-based learning in sensorimotor adaptation tasks.

Authors:  Peter A Butcher; Richard B Ivry; Sheng-Han Kuo; David Rydz; John W Krakauer; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Utilisation of advance motor information is impaired in Friedreich ataxia.

Authors:  Louise A Corben; Martin B Delatycki; John L Bradshaw; Andrew J Churchyard; Nellie Georgiou-Karistianis
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 4.  The cerebellar network: revisiting the critical issues.

Authors:  Egidio D'Angelo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Individual differences in implicit motor learning: task specificity in sensorimotor adaptation and sequence learning.

Authors:  Alit Stark-Inbar; Meher Raza; Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  The bottleneck of the psychological refractory period effect involves timing of response initiation rather than response selection.

Authors:  Stuart T Klapp; Dana Maslovat; Richard J Jagacinski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

7.  Impaired visuomotor adaptation in adults with ADHD.

Authors:  Laura B F Kurdziel; Katherine Dempsey; Mackenzie Zahara; Eve Valera; Rebecca M C Spencer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Age differences in symbolic representations of motor sequence learning.

Authors:  J Bo; S J Peltier; D C Noll; R D Seidler
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  An explicit strategy prevails when the cerebellum fails to compute movement errors.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Nola M Klemfuss; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 10.  Cerebellar and prefrontal cortex contributions to adaptation, strategies, and reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.