Literature DB >> 18752079

A beam-matching concept for medical linear accelerators.

David Sjöström1, Ulf Bjelkengren, Wiviann Ottosson, Claus F Behrens.   

Abstract

The flexibility in radiotherapy can be improved if a patient can be moved between any one of the department's medical linear accelerators without the need to change anything in the patient's treatment plan. For this to be possible, the dosimetric characteristics of the various accelerators must be the same, or nearly the same i.e. the accelerators must be beam-matched. During a period of nine months, eight Varian iX accelerators with 6 and 15 MV photon beams and 6-18 MeV electron beams (only four of the eight) were installed at our clinic. All accelerators fulfilled the vendor-defined "fine beam-match" criteria, and a more extensive set of measurements was carried out during commissioning. The measured absorbed dose data for each accelerator were compared with the first accelerator, chosen as reference, and the TPS calculations. Two of the eight accelerators showed a larger discrepancy for the 15 MV beam not revealed by the vendor-defined acceptance criteria, whereas the other six accelerators were satisfactorily matched. The beam-matching acceptance criteria defined by the vendor are not strict enough to guarantee optimal beam-match. Deviations related to dose calculations and to beam-matched accelerators may add up. The safest and most practical way to ensure that all accelerators are within clinical acceptable accuracy is to include TPS calculations in the evaluation. Further, comparisons between measurements and calculations should be done in absolute dose terms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18752079     DOI: 10.1080/02841860802258794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  19 in total

1.  A mathematical approach to beam matching.

Authors:  B Sarkar; A Manikandan; M Nandy; M S Gossman; C S Sureka; A Ray; N Sujatha
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Evaluation of beam matching accuracy among six linacs from the same vendor.

Authors:  Chockkalingam Krishnappan; Chandrasekaran Anu Radha; Karunakaran Balaji; Prasanna Kumar Mani; Vendhan Subramani; Velmurugan Thanigaimalai; Madhan Kumar Gunasekaran; Velayudham Ramasubramanian
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-09-29

3.  Technical Report: Reference photon dosimetry data for Varian accelerators based on IROC-Houston site visit data.

Authors:  James R Kerns; David S Followill; Jessica Lowenstein; Andrea Molineu; Paola Alvarez; Paige A Taylor; Francesco C Stingo; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Modification and validation of an analytical source model for external beam radiotherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations.

Authors:  Scott E Davidson; Jing Cui; Stephen Kry; Joseph O Deasy; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Milos Vicic; R Allen White; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Dosimetric analysis of beam-matching procedure of two similar linear accelerators.

Authors:  Janhavi R Bhangle; V K Sathiya Narayanan; Namitha K Kumar; R Vaitheeswaran
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2011-07

6.  Dosimetric and geometric evaluation of the use of deformable image registration in adaptive intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  R B Eiland; C Maare; D Sjöström; E Samsøe; C F Behrens
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  Optimized Varian aSi portal dosimetry: development of datasets for collective use.

Authors:  Ann Van Esch; Dominique P Huyskens; Lukas Hirschi; Christof Baltes
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Clinical implementation of electron energy changes of varian linear accelerators.

Authors:  Sean Zhang; Praimakorn Liengsawangwong; Patricia Lindsay; Karl Prado; Tzouh-Liang Sun; Roy Steadham; Xiaochun Wang; Mohammad Salehpour; Michael Gillin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Commissioning measurements for photon beam data on three TrueBeam linear accelerators, and comparison with Trilogy and Clinac 2100 linear accelerators.

Authors:  Gloria P Beyer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Is the dose distribution distorted in IMRT and RapidArc treatment when patient plans are swapped across beam-matched machines?

Authors:  Chockkalingam Krishnappan; Chandrasekaran Anu Radha; Vendhan Subramani; Madhan Kumar Gunasekaran
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.