Literature DB >> 18751177

Attitudes after unintended injury during treatment a survey of doctors and patients.

M Hingorani1, T Wong, G Vafidis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the attitudes of doctors and patients toward the disclosure of information after adverse medical events.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional questionnaire survey.
SETTING: Ophthalmology department of an outer London hospital.
SUBJECTS: 246 patients attending one ophthalmic outpatient clinic during a 5-week period and 48 ophthalmologists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of each group who believed that patients should be informed about the occurrence of an adverse event and its potential future complications following elective ophthalmic surgery.
RESULTS: Most patients (226/246, 91.8%) believed that a patient should be informed of an adverse event. Fewer ophthalmologists (29/48, 60.5%, P<0.001; odds ratio 7.4 [95% CI 3.7-14.3]) shared this belief. The majority of patients (200/246, 88.5%) believed that a patient should be as fully informed as possible about the event and possible future complications, but this belief was shared by a minority of ophthalmologists (16/48, 33.3%, P<0.001; odds ratio 8.7 [95% CI 4.7-15.9]).
CONCLUSION: After an adverse medical event, there is a discrepancy between the amount of information that patients wish to be given and that which physicians feel is appropriate.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 18751177      PMCID: PMC1305760     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  3 in total

1.  Error in medicine.

Authors:  L L Leape
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-12-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I.

Authors:  T A Brennan; L L Leape; N M Laird; L Hebert; A R Localio; A G Lawthers; J P Newhouse; P C Weiler; H H Hiatt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-02-07       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action.

Authors:  C Vincent; M Young; A Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-06-25       Impact factor: 79.321

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Should doctors disclose mistakes?

Authors:  K K Renwick
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-01

Review 2.  Frequency, Expected Effects, Obstacles, and Facilitators of Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Minsu Ock; So Yun Lim; Min-Woo Jo; Sang-Il Lee
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2017-01-26

3.  Korean physicians' perceptions regarding disclosure of patient safety incidents: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jeehee Pyo; Eun Young Choi; Won Lee; Seung Gyeong Jang; Young-Kwon Park; Minsu Ock; Sang-Il Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluating the expected effects of disclosure of patient safety incidents using hypothetical cases in Korea.

Authors:  Minsu Ock; Eun Young Choi; Min-Woo Jo; Sang-Il Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  General Public's Attitudes Toward Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents in Korea: Results of Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents Survey I.

Authors:  Minsu Ock; Eun Young Choi; Min-Woo Jo; Sang-Il Lee
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.243

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.