Literature DB >> 1874993

Gender bias against and sexual harassment of AMWA members in Massachusetts.

S A Lenhart1, F Klein, P Falcao, E Phelan, K Smith.   

Abstract

Despite the increasing participation of women in medicine over the past few decades, hindrances to professional advancement for women physicians and medical students persist. The present study sought to assess the prevalence of gender bias and sexual harassment in a sample of women physicians and medical students. Within a one-year period, 54% of respondents encountered some form of sex discrimination. In addition, approximately one-fourth experienced sexual harassment (27%) and/or discrimination related to parenthood (24%). Unwanted sexual attention not viewed as sexual harassment was experienced by more than twice as many respondents (55%). Other forms of discrimination were reported as well: age (22%), sexual preference (20%), and race (7%). Perceptions of the extent of sex discrimination and sexual harassment, of their impact on professional commitment, and of the adequacy of solutions at institutions varied directly with whether or not respondents had experienced some form of employment discrimination within the past 12 months. This study points to the need for clarification of what constitutes sexual harassment and for the creation of safe, effective mechanisms to remedy and prevent all forms of gender bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1874993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)        ISSN: 0098-8421


  3 in total

1.  Workplace discrimination: experiences of practicing physicians.

Authors:  Alice A Tolbert Coombs; Roderick K King
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Addressing Sexual and Gender Harassment in Pharmacy Education to Improve Provider Wellness and Patient Care.

Authors:  Rebecca Schoen; Amy Henneman
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Women in hospital medicine in the United Kingdom: glass ceiling, preference, prejudice or cohort effect?

Authors:  I C McManus; K A Sproston
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.710

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.