Literature DB >> 18728664

Phase II trial of imatinib mesylate in patients with metastatic melanoma.

K B Kim1, O Eton, D W Davis, M L Frazier, D J McConkey, A H Diwan, N E Papadopoulos, A Y Bedikian, L H Camacho, M I Ross, J N Cormier, J E Gershenwald, J E Lee, P F Mansfield, L A Billings, C S Ng, C Charnsangavej, M Bar-Eli, M M Johnson, A J Murgo, V G Prieto.   

Abstract

Metastatic melanoma cells express a number of protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) that are considered to be targets for imatinib. We conducted a phase II trial of imatinib in patients with metastatic melanoma expressing at least one of these PTKs. Twenty-one patients whose tumours expressed at least one PTK (c-kit, platelet-derived growth factor receptors, c-abl, or abl-related gene) were treated with 400 mg of imatinib twice daily. One patient with metastatic acral lentiginous melanoma, containing the highest c-kit expression among all patients, had dramatic improvement on positron emission tomographic scan at 6 weeks and had a partial response lasting 12.8 months. The responder had a substantial increase in tumour and endothelial cell apoptosis at 2 weeks of treatment. Imatinib was fairly well tolerated: no patient required treatment discontinuation because of toxicity. Fatigue and oedema were the only grade 3 or 4 toxicities that occurred in more than 10% of the patients. Imatinib at the studied dose had minimal clinical efficacy as a single-agent therapy for metastatic melanoma. However, based on the characteristics of the responding tumour in our study, clinical activity of imatinib, specifically in patients with melanoma with certain c-kit aberrations, should be examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18728664      PMCID: PMC2528157          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Imatinib (STI-571, Gleevec; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland) is a small-molecule inhibitor of protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs), including the Bcr–Abl fusion protein, c-abl, abl-related gene (ARG), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-α, PDGFR-β, and the c-kit tyrosine kinase receptor (Druker and Lydon, 2000; Schindler ; Okuda ). In cell-based assays, imatinib selectively inhibits PDGF- and stem cell factor-mediated cellular signalling, including ligand-stimulated receptor autophosphorylation, inositol phosphate formation, and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and proliferation (Buchdunger , 1996). These properties suggest that in addition to treating chronic myelogenous leukaemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumours, imatinib may be useful in the treatment of diseases that involve abnormal activation of c-kit, PDGFRs, or other PTKs. We previously demonstrated differential expression of PTKs in paraffin-embedded human metastatic melanoma specimens (Shen ). Out of 31 specimens examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC), 17 (55%) expressed c-kit, 30 (97%) expressed PDGFR-α, 21 (68%) expressed PDGFR-β, 23 (74%) expressed ARG, and 27 (87%) expressed c-abl. These findings indicate that a subset of patients with metastatic melanoma may have tumours that express imatinib's target PTKs. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of imatinib in patients with metastatic melanoma that expressed these PTKs, we conducted a phase II study of imatinib. We performed tumour biopsies before and during treatment to examine genetic mutations and PTK expression and to assess the effects of imatinib on apoptosis of tumour and tumour-associated endothelial cells.

Materials and methods

Patient selection

This was an open-label, phase II clinical trial. The protocol for this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. All patients gave written informed consent before enrollment. Eligible patients were required to have histologically confirmed melanoma with measurable metastases and no more than one prior systemic treatment, not counting adjuvant interferon-α. A pretreatment tumour biopsy must have had at least 25% of the tumour cells stain positive by IHC for PDGFR-α, PDGFR-β, c-kit (CD117), c-abl, or ARG for patients to enroll in this trial. Patients in whom the brain was the only site of metastasis or patients who had symptomatic central nervous system metastases were excluded. However, patients with small asymptomatic brain metastases were eligible.

Treatment plan

Imatinib was administered orally at a dose of 400 mg twice a day until there was evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or until the patient refused to continue treatment. Because imatinib can irritate the gastrointestinal tract, patients were instructed to take the drug with meals. One course was defined as 6 weeks of treatment. All patients underwent tumour biopsies before treatment to assess target PTK expression by IHC. Patients were also asked to undergo a second biopsy during the second week of treatment for correlative studies.

Response evaluation

In addition to routine radiological assessment including computed tomography at intervals of 6 weeks, patients' disease was also evaluated by positron emission tomography (PET) at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment. Clinical responses were evaluated using the international criteria proposed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Committee (Therasse ). Responses were evaluated after every 6-week course. Overall clinical response included both complete and partial responses. Time to progression, duration of response, and overall survival were measured from the start of treatment.

Toxicity evaluation

Toxicities were evaluated and recorded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0. Patients were required to keep a daily record of adverse events and changes in concomitant medications. Complete blood counts and serum chemistry panels were obtained every 2 weeks.

Receptor kinase expression

Immunohistochemical staining protocols were used to detect c-kit, c-abl, ARG, PDGFR-α, and PDGFR-β in paraffin-embedded tumour specimens (Shen ). A rabbit antihuman antibody against c-kit (dilution, 1 ng ml−1) was purchased from DAKO (Carpinteria, CA, USA); the rabbit (PDGFR-α, PDGFR-β) and goat (c-abl) anti-human antibodies against PDGFR-α, PDGFR-β (dilutions, 1 ng ml−1), c-abl (dilutions 1 : 200), and ARG (dilutions 1 : 200) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Antibody staining was optimised using tissue sections before antibodies were applied to tissue microarray sections. PDGFR-α and PDGFR-β were retrieved by treatment with pepsin at 37°C for 10 min, c-kit was retrieved by microwave treatment for 5 min, and no antigen retrieval was performed for c-abl or ARG. All primary antibodies were applied to the slides and incubated at 4°C overnight. Diaminobenzidine was used as a chromogen. Both the percentage of positive cells and the intensity of staining were graded by two dermatopathologists. The scoring system for IHC staining for the PTKs was assigned in the following way. For the percentage of cells staining positively for PTK: 0, 0–5%; 1, 6–25%; 2, 26–75%; 3, >75%; for the intensity of staining: 1, weak; 2, moderate; 3, strong.

Tumour and endothelial cell apoptosis

Frozen tumour specimens were serially sectioned and stained for vessel count with an immunofluorescent antibody against the endothelial marker CD31. Apoptosis of tumour and endothelial cells was assessed by counting the number of cells (out of a total of 500) that stained positively with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labelling (TUNEL). Sections were superimposed on one another by computer imaging to determine the degree of endothelial cell apoptosis at the invasive edges of the tumours.

DNA sequencing

DNA was isolated from frozen tissue or from tissue stored in RNAlater (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) using a QIAamp DNA minikit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA was extracted by standard methods using an RNeasy minicolumn (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was prepared using the two-step TaqMan reverse transcription reagent (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions, except that a primer specific for c-kit RNA (KIT 2961R, 5′-TTCCTGGAGGGGTGACCCAAACACT-3′) was used instead of random primers. The cDNA was then amplified by polymerase chain reaction. Nucleotide sequences were analysed with a 3730 × 1 DNA analyser (Applied Biosystems) at the M.D. Anderson Nucleic Acid Core Facility. The genomic DNA sequence of exons 9, 11, 13, 15, and, 17 was analysed as described previously (Chen ).

Statistical analysis

The statistical design of the study was based on a modified two-stage Simon's design (Simon, 1989). Twenty-one patients were to be enrolled and treated in the first stage of the study and 20 in the second stage, summing up to 41 patients. If the response rate was 5% (1 out of 21 patients) or less at the end of the first stage, the study would be terminated. If two or more patients responded, accrual would continue to a total of 41 patients. If the response rate at the end of the study was 10% (4 out of 41) or less, the regimen would be rejected for further study as a single agent for metastatic melanoma. If the response rate was higher, the drug would be recommended for further study. These calculations assumed there was 90% or greater probability that the regimen would be recommended for further study if the true efficacy rate was 20% or greater, and less than 5% probability if the true efficacy rate was 5% or less.

Results

Patient characteristics

From January 2002 to October 2003, 22 patients were enrolled and 21 were treated with imatinib. One patient with early progressive central nervous system metastases was not treated. The pretreatment characteristics of the patients are listed in Table 1. All 21 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Two patients (10%) had stage III melanoma with multiple unresectable in-transit lesions, and all others (90%) had stage IV melanoma.
Table 1

Patient characteristics

Characteristic No. of patients (%)
Total patients enrolled for the study22
Total patients treated21
Evaluable patients21 (100)
  
Sex
 Male13 (62)
 Female8 (38)
  
Age (years)
 Median58
 Range33–83
  
ECOG performance status
 06 (29)
 114 (67)
 21 (5)
  
Disease stage
 III2 (10)
 IV19 (90)
  (M1a)2 (10)
  (M1b)6 (29)
  (M1c)11 (52)
  
Serum lactate dehydrogenase level
 Normal18 (86)
 Higher than upper limit of normal3 (14)
  
Prior treatment
 None8 (38)
 Interferon-α therapy (adjuvant)8 (38)
 Isolated limb perfusion2 (10)
 Biologic2 (10)
 Chemotherapy4 (19)
  
Pathologic type of primary melanoma
 Superficial spreading melanoma5 (24)
 Nodular melanoma2 (10)
 Acral lentiginous melanoma2 (10)
 Melanoma of the soft part1 (5)
 Unknown primary3 (14)
 Unclassified or unspecified8 (38)
  
Site of primary melanoma
 Upper extremities3 (14)
  Thumb – terminal phalanx1 (5)
 Lower extremities9 (43)
  Plantar surface5 (24)
 Scalp/face/neck2 (10)
 Torso4 (19)
 Unknown3 (14)
  
Site of metastases
 Dermis/subcutaneous tissue17 (81)
 Lymph nodes10 (48)
 Lung14 (67)
 Liver3 (14)
 Bone3 (14)
 Brain3 (14)
  
Number of organs with metastases
 Median3
 Range1–5

ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

All 22 patients enrolled had tumours expressing at least one target PTK. The baseline immunohistochemical data for the 21 treated patients who qualified the patients for enrollment are summarised in Table 2.
Table 2

Receptor expression and clinical response

Patient c-kit PDGFR-α PDGFR-β c-abl ARG Response
(A) Pretreatment
13/20/02/10/00/0PD
2 3/2 3/1 3/1 3/2 0/0 SD
3 0/0 0/0 3/1 2/1 0/0 SD
43/20/00/00/01/1PD
53/10/03/10/00/1PD
6 3/2 0/0 0/0 0/0 2/1 SD
73/23/23/23/10/0PD
8 3/3 0/0 3/1 2/2 0/0 PR
93/23/23/33/22/1PD
102/12/10/02/10/0PD
112/20/10/12/32/3PD
121/10/11/11/12/2PD
133/20/01/12/11/1PD
143/13/13/13/33/2PD
153/22/12/12/10/0PD
163/10/10/11/10/0PD
172/22/13/12/21/1PD
183/23/23/23/23/2PD
19 2/1 3/3 2/1 1/1 0/0 SD
202/12/12/10/01/1PD
210/02/11/12/10/0PD
       
Patient c-kit PDGFR-α PDGFR-β c-abl ARG Response
(B) During second week of treatment
12/1↓0/00/0↓2/1↑0/0PD
2       SD
3 0/0– 0/0– 0/0↓ 2/2↑ 2/1↑ SD
43/20/00/00/00/0↓PD
5     PD
6 3/2– 0/0– 0/0– 2/1↑ 2/1– SD
7     PD
8 3/3– 0/0– 0/0↓ 0/0↓ 0/0– PR
  2/2 * 0/0 * 0/0 * 0/0 * 0/0 *  
90/0↓1/1↓1/1↓1/1↓0/0↓PD
102/2↑1/1↓0/02/10/0PD
113/2↑0/2↑2/1↑2/1↓3/1PD
122/2↑0/13/2↑0/0↓1/1↓PD
130/0↓0/1↑0/0↓0/0↓0/1↓PD
14     PD
15     PD
16     PD
17     PD
181/1↓0/0↓0/0↓0/1↓0/1↓PD
19 0/0↓ 0/0↓ 0/0↓ 0/0↓ 0/0– SD
20     PD
211/1↑1/20/1↓2/10/0PD

ARG=abl-related gene; PD=progressive disease; PDGFR=platelet-derived growth factor receptor; PR=partial response; SD=stable disease.

The first number is an indicator of the percentage of cells staining positive for the protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) (0, 0–5%; 1, 6–25%; 2, 26–75%; 3, >75%); the second number denotes the staining intensity (1, weak; 2, moderate; 3, strong).

Blank spaces indicate no tissue available for analysis.

↑ denotes increase in protein expression during treatment.

↓ denotes decrease in protein expression during treatment.

– denotes no change in protein expression during treatment.

* denotes PTK expression at the time of relapse (patient 8).

Treatment

The 21 patients received a total of 33 courses of imatinib (median, one course per patient; range, 1–9). Three patients were unable to complete the first course of therapy because of rapid disease progression; one of them died of a progressing haemorrhagic brain metastasis. Thirteen and four patients completed one and two courses, respectively. The sole patient with responding disease tolerated nine consecutive courses of treatment over a period of 1 year. One patient with a history of rheumatoid arthritis required a dose reduction to 300 mg twice a day because of grade 3 polyarthritis. No other patient required a dose reduction.

Responses

Clinical responses are listed in Table 2. Among the 21 patients treated, 4 had disease stabilisation, which lasted no more than 12 weeks. Only one patient (5%) had a partial response, which lasted for 12.8 months. That patient was a 66-year-old man whose disease had progressed while he had been receiving intratumoral HLA-B7 plasmid gene transfer treatment. He had a near-complete response to imatinib in numerous metastases of the cutaneous and subcutaneous tissues, inguinal and iliac lymph nodes, and lungs. After just 6 weeks of treatment, a PET scan revealed a marked reduction of metabolic activity in all disease sites (Figure 1). Follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans did not confirm ongoing major response in this patient until after 12 weeks of treatment. Serial physical exams with photographs confirmed gradual depigmentation and complete resolution of all palpable skin nodules and follow-up CT scans showed near-complete resolution in nodal and lung metastases after 6 months. The treatment was discontinued when he developed new brain metastases and a recurrence in the lymph nodes. This patient was later treated with temozolomide and paclitaxel achieving a brief partial response, but subsequently died of disease progression 26 months after the beginning of imatinib treatment.
Figure 1

Clinical and radiological studies of a partial response to imatinib. All metastatic lesions shrank. (A) Response of in-transit metastases on right thigh. (B) Computed tomographic scan showing response of left external iliac lymph node (arrow). (C) Positron emission tomographic scans showing decrease in fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in all lesions (arrows). (D) Photomicrograph of the strong c-kit expression in the tumour of the responder. (E) Photomicrograph of a case of negative c-kit expression.

With progression of disease confirmed in all patients, the median time to disease progression was 1.4 months (range, 0.6–12.8), and the median overall survival duration was 7.5 months (range, 0.7–25.8+), with two patients alive at 19 months.

Toxicity

Adverse events are listed in Table 3 by toxicity grade and frequency. No patient required treatment discontinuation for toxicity. Fatigue and oedema were the only grade 3 or 4 adverse events that occurred in more than 10% of the patients, and these were reversible upon discontinuation of treatment.
Table 3

Toxicities observed with imatinib treatment (number of patients with toxicity)

Adverse event Grade 1/2 Grade 3 Grade 4
Fatigue1431
Anaemia121
Oedema133
Nausea132
Muscle weakness62
Anorexia141
Lymphopoenia101
Vomiting91
Skin erythema/pruritis91
Constipation71
Dyspepsia71
Neutropoenia41
Ocular effects (visual changes)8
Arthralgia11
Dyspnoea7
Diarrhoea7
Pleural effusion7  
Diaphoresis6
Cough6
Haemorrhage6
Thrombocytopoenia3
Fever3
Serum creatinine elevation3
Peripheral neuropathy2
Petechia2
Ascites1

Correlative studies

We examined PTK expression in melanoma cells at baseline and during the second week of treatment (Table 2). Among the 21 patients treated, all with evaluable baseline tumour specimens, 16 also had specimens obtained during the second week of treatment. Thirteen of the second-week specimens were evaluable for PTK expression. With only one major response, no definite association could be made between the baseline immunohistochemical data and the observed clinical activity (Table 2A). Nevertheless, the patient with the major response had strong c-kit receptor staining in over 75% of the tumour cells – the strongest staining pattern observed among all the pretreatment specimens. Among the evaluable 13 paired baseline and follow-up specimens, there were no consistent staining pattern changes observed after 2 weeks of treatment. Most often, however, there was a decrease in PTK receptor staining intensity (Table 2B). In the patient with the major response, c-kit receptor staining did not change, and there was complete loss of PDGFR-β and abl staining 2 weeks into treatment. The responding patient's tumours also showed an increase in the percentage of apoptotic endothelial and tumour cells after only 2 weeks of imatinib treatment, based on the CD31-TUNEL dual immunofluorescence studies, suggesting a very early impact of treatment on the tumour specimen (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Tumour and endothelial cell apoptosis before treatment and during the second week of imatinib treatment. (A) Tumour cell apoptosis in five patients; patient 5 had a partial response. (B) Endothelial cell apoptosis in five patients. (C) Photomicrographs of the TUNEL stains for both melanoma and endothelial cells in the responder. Red in the CD31 column represents the endothelial cells, and green in the TUNEL column represents apoptotic cells. Yellow (indicated by an arrow) in the overlay column represents endothelial cells undergoing apoptosis.

We analysed pretreatment tumour samples from five patients, including the only responder, for c-kit mutation for both genomic DNA and cDNAs. None of our melanoma specimens analysed, including those from the responding patient, contained genomic mutations of c-kit in exon 9 or 11, which is frequently mutated in imatinib-responsive gastrointestinal stromal tumours (Heinrich ). Genomic sequences of c-kit in exons 13, 15, and 17 were also analysed, and none of the specimens contained mutations in these sites. Of interest, the cDNA to RNA from the responder's tumour displayed alternative splicing in exon 15 of the c-kit kinase II domain (Figure 3). This alternate splice form had a 3 bp deletion of the codon for serine (codon 715) at the very beginning of exon 15. The alternate splice form encodes the SER715− isoform of c-kit (Crosier ; Lasota ). However, this finding was not specific for the responding patient; four non-responding patients also had this alternative splice in their tumours.
Figure 3

Chromatogram of the sequence for the alternative splicing seen in c-kit mRNA from the responding patient. The c-kit cDNA sequence from the responder displayed a deletion of the first three nucleotides of exon 15, which encoded a serine (codon 715).

There was no evidence of an immunological infiltrate in the responding metastases.

Discussion

In this trial, imatinib was given orally at 400 mg twice a day without interruption. Wyman reported that imatinib administered at 400 mg twice a day caused unexpectedly severe toxicity with frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events, requiring dose reduction and even treatment cessation. In another phase II study of imatinib, in which 18 patients with treatment-refractory advance melanoma were treated, Ugurel showed that there was no clinical response among 16 evaluable patients. However, in our study, 400 mg of imatinib given twice a day was fairly well tolerated. The toxicity of imatinib observed in our study was similar to previously reported clinical studies (van Oosterom ; Verweij ). Most adverse events, especially skin rash and pleural effusion, were self-limiting without drug discontinuation. In our study, there was early progression of disease in the majority of patients and only one partial response, precluding the study from entering the second stage of accrual. This lack of efficacy was also observed in the other clinical trial testing the same dose and schedule of imatinib (Wyman ). In that trial, the 26 patients enrolled with metastatic melanoma had a higher percentage of visceral metastases (stage M1c) and had received more prior systemic therapy compared with the patients enrolled in our study (58 vs 32% and 73 vs 27%, respectively). More grade 3 or 4 nausea, vomiting, fatigue, fluid retention with oedema, anaemia, hyponatraemia, and hypoglycaemia were observed in the second trial, perhaps as a result of these poorer prognostic characteristics. No clinical responses were reported. Hence, there has been only one partial response reported among the 46 evaluable patients treated in these two trials for an aggregate response rate of 2% and a median time to progression of less than 8 weeks. Since all tumours screened in our study expressed at least one of the five target PTKs, based on positive immunohistochemical staining in at least 25% of the cells, the 25% threshold was not selective for predicting clinical response. Furthermore, there was only one clinical response among the 21 patients; therefore, positive IHC results, as defined in our study, were not predictive of response to imatinib. Nevertheless, in tumours from the one patient who had a meaningful and prolonged clinical response, over 75% of the cells had marked c-kit staining. None of the other patients' tumours had such intense staining; thus the threshold for positive staining, if used to select patients for treatment, could be set at a higher value in future studies. On the other hand, no change in the strong c-kit staining during the second week of treatment in the responding melanoma could be evidence that total expression of c-kit is not the critical marker for imatinib activity. Similarly, the decrease in staining intensity for PDGFR-β and c-abl in the responding tumour could be discounted as important leads as this pattern of staining was also seen in the non-responding specimens. Despite the lack of correlative biological changes observed with imatinib in this patient, we believe that the lone response was not a coincidence because the response was observed in multiple sites including multiple in-transit lesions, deep inguinal nodes, and lung, and lasted more than a year on therapy. In addition, it is worth noting that the responder's primary disease was acral lentiginous melanoma. Recently, Curtin demonstrated that nearly 30–40% subtypes of melanoma, such as acral lentiginous, mucosal melanoma, or cutaneous melanoma, on chronic sun-damaged skin, harbour c-kit mutation and/or aberration, such as a gene amplification or an increased gene copy number. Although no genomic mutation in c-kit was found in the tumour of the responder in our trial, it is possible that the tumour contained either an increased c-kit gene copy number or its gene amplification, which might have activated the c-kit signal pathway. We found the alternative splice in exon 15, which encodes the SER715− isoform of c-kit in tumour samples, but this variant, which has been reported in other tumour types by a number of investigators (Crosier ; Ashman, 1999; Lasota ), did not predict the response to imatinib. The increase in apoptosis of both tumour and endothelial cells in the responding patient implies that imatinib may effectively inactivate important signal transduction pathways in endothelial cells as well. For instance, PDGFRs are known to be expressed both on melanoma and on endothelial cells (Beitz ; Barnhill ; Shen ). The nature of the imatinib-sensitive signals that mediate survival of endothelial cells is being investigated. We are currently investigating the phosphorylation status of the target PTKs and the effect of imatinib on the inactivation of these targets in melanoma and endothelial cells of tumours from the patients in this study. As reported in CML and GIST, resistance to imatinib was observed in the responder after 1 year of treatment. Many mechanisms have been suggested for this as well as ways to circumvent evolution of resistance in a previously exploitable pathway, including, but not limited to, substituting other PTK inhibitors or combining imatinib with other agents that affect other signal transduction steps. In addition, imatinib resistance might result from kinase-activating mutations of B-Raf, which is downstream of the target receptor kinases of imatinib. Davies recently showed that approximately 66% of melanomas contain somatic missense mutations, located within the kinase domain of B-Raf, with the ability to transform NIH3T3 cells. These mutations can constitutively activate the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, regardless of imatinib's ability to inactivate upstream receptor kinases. It may be necessary to select patients without such B-Raf mutations to increase the rate of clinical response to imatinib in patients with metastatic melanoma. There is also increasing evidence that combinations of imatinib and chemotherapeutic agents, such as taxane or gemcitabine, have synergistic antitumour activity in vitro and in vivo (Pietras ; Hwang ; Mathew ). In conclusion, single-agent imatinib had only minimal clinical efficacy in patients with metastatic melanoma. The success of imatinib as a targeted therapy for advanced melanoma will depend on more stringent selection of patients with exploitable tumour targets and its use either sequentially or in combination with other agents. Currently, imatinib is under clinical investigation in patients with advanced melanoma harbouring somatic alterations of c-kit, and its result is eagerly anticipated.
  24 in total

1.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-03

2.  Selective inhibition of the platelet-derived growth factor signal transduction pathway by a protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the 2-phenylaminopyrimidine class.

Authors:  E Buchdunger; J Zimmermann; H Mett; T Meyer; M Müller; U Regenass; N B Lydon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Human microvascular endothelial cells express receptors for platelet-derived growth factor.

Authors:  J G Beitz; I S Kim; P Calabresi; A R Frackelton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Expression of isoforms of the human receptor tyrosine kinase c-kit in leukemic cell lines and acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  P S Crosier; S T Ricciardi; L R Hall; M R Vitas; S C Clark; K E Crosier
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  A missense mutation in KIT kinase domain 1 correlates with imatinib resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Lei L Chen; Jonathan C Trent; Elsie F Wu; Gregory N Fuller; Latha Ramdas; Wei Zhang; Austin K Raymond; Victor G Prieto; Caroline O Oyedeji; Kelly K Hunt; Raphael E Pollock; Barry W Feig; Kimberly J Hayes; Haesun Choi; Homer A Macapinlac; Walter Hittelman; Marco A Velasco; Shreyaskumar Patel; Michael A Burgess; Robert S Benjamin; Marsha L Frazier
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Combination docetaxel and platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibition with imatinib mesylate in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Paul Mathew; Isaiah J Fidler; Christopher J Logothetis
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Inhibition of PDGF receptor signaling in tumor stroma enhances antitumor effect of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kristian Pietras; Kristofer Rubin; Tobias Sjöblom; Elisabeth Buchdunger; Mats Sjöquist; Carl-Henrik Heldin; Arne Ostman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor receptor phosphorylation by STI571 (Gleevec) reduces growth and metastasis of human pancreatic carcinoma in an orthotopic nude mouse model.

Authors:  Rosa F Hwang; Kenji Yokoi; Corazon D Bucana; Rachel Tsan; Jerald J Killion; Douglas B Evans; Isaiah J Fidler
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Imatinib mesylate (STI-571 Glivec, Gleevec) is an active agent for gastrointestinal stromal tumours, but does not yield responses in other soft-tissue sarcomas that are unselected for a molecular target. Results from an EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group phase II study.

Authors:  J Verweij; A van Oosterom; J-Y Blay; I Judson; S Rodenhuis; W van der Graaf; J Radford; A Le Cesne; P C W Hogendoorn; E D di Paola; M Brown; O S Nielsen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  Michael C Heinrich; Christopher L Corless; George D Demetri; Charles D Blanke; Margaret von Mehren; Heikki Joensuu; Laura S McGreevey; Chang-Jie Chen; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Brian J Druker; Beate Kiese; Burton Eisenberg; Peter J Roberts; Samuel Singer; Christopher D M Fletcher; Sandra Silberman; Sasa Dimitrijevic; Jonathan A Fletcher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  58 in total

Review 1.  Targeting KIT in melanoma: a paradigm of molecular medicine and targeted therapeutics.

Authors:  Scott E Woodman; Michael A Davies
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 2.  Driver mutations in melanoma: lessons learned from bench-to-bedside studies.

Authors:  Janice M Mehnert; Harriet M Kluger
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Novel targeted therapies for the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Ragini Kudchadkar
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2010

4.  New horizons in melanoma treatment: targeting molecular pathways.

Authors:  Christopher W M Soon; Alain P Algazi; Edward N Cha; Adil I Daud
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2010

Review 5.  Therapy for metastatic melanoma: the past, present, and future.

Authors:  Laura Finn; Svetomir N Markovic; Richard W Joseph
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  KGF Promotes Paracrine Activation of the SCF/c-KIT Axis from Human Keratinocytes to Melanoma Cells.

Authors:  Francesca Belleudi; Giorgia Cardinali; Daniela Kovacs; Mauro Picardo; Maria Rosaria Torrisi
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  SRC family kinase inhibition as a novel strategy to augment melphalan-based regional chemotherapy of advanced extremity melanoma.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Tokuhisa; Michael E Lidsky; Hiroaki Toshimitsu; Ryan S Turley; Georgia M Beasley; Tomio Ueno; Ketan Sharma; Christina K Augustine; Douglas S Tyler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Targeted therapy and immunotherapy in advanced melanoma: an evolving paradigm.

Authors:  Muhammad Khattak; Rosalie Fisher; Samra Turajlic; James Larkin
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 8.168

9.  Correlation between KIT expression and KIT mutation in melanoma: a study of 173 cases with emphasis on the acral-lentiginous/mucosal type.

Authors:  Carlos A Torres-Cabala; Wei-Lien Wang; Jonathan Trent; Dan Yang; Su Chen; John Galbincea; Kevin B Kim; Scott Woodman; Michael Davies; Jose A Plaza; J W Nash; Victor G Prieto; Alexander J Lazar; Doina Ivan
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  Molecular markers of tumor progression in melanoma.

Authors:  Joshua Rother; Dan Jones
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.