Literature DB >> 18728661

Liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer patients and thymidylate synthase polymorphisms for predicting response to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

F Graziano1, A Ruzzo, F Loupakis, D Santini, V Catalano, E Canestrari, P Maltese, R Bisonni, L Fornaro, G Baldi, G Masi, A Falcone, G Tonini, P Giordani, P Alessandroni, L Giustini, B Vincenzi, M Magnani.   

Abstract

We investigated the association between thymidylate synthase (TS) germline polymorphisms and response to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in 80 patients with liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). The tandem repeat polymorphism (VNTR) in TS 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR), which consists of two (2R) or three (3R) 28-bp repeated sequences, with or without a G/C nucleotide change in 3R carriers (3G or 3C) and a 6-bp insertion/deletion (6+/6-) in the TS 3'-UTR, was studied. The distinction between high (2R/3G, 3C/3G and 3G/3G) and low (2R/2R, 2R/3C and 3C/3C) TS expression genotypes according to the 5'-UTR VNTR+G/C nucleotide change showed significant association with tumour response (P=0.01). In particular, high TS expression genotypes were found in 8 out of 34 patients (23.5%) with complete or partial response and in 24 out of 46 patients (52%) with stable disease and disease progression. Liver-only MCRC patients are a homogeneous and clinical relevant subgroup that may represent an ideal setting for studying the actual influence of TS polymorphisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18728661      PMCID: PMC2528158          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Functional polymorphisms in the 5′-untranslated region (5′-UTR) and the 3′-UTR of the thymidylate synthase (TS) gene have been identified in the last decade (Marsh, 2005). A variable number of 28-bp tandem repeated sequence (VNTR) in TS 5′-UTR determines two (2R) or three (3R) alleles (Horie ) and three common genotypes (2R/2R, 2R/3R and 3R/3R). Upregulated TS protein levels were found to be associated with the 3R allele (Kawakami ; Yu ). A G/C single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the 3R allele was found to determine two additional alleles (3G or 3C) at this locus (Kawakami and Watanabe, 2003; Mandola ), and according to their functional role, it allows a distinction between high (2R/3G, 3C/3G and 3G/3G) and low (2R/2R, 2R/3C and 3C/3C) TS expression genotypes in vivo (Morganti ; Yawata ). A more recently discovered TS genetic variant is a 6-bp insertion/deletion (6+/6) in 3′-UTR (Ulrich ). TS 3′-UTR genotypes (6+/6+−, 6+/6− and 6−/6−) seem to be associated with variable TS mRNA levels (Mandola ); however, the functional effect of the 3′-UTR polymorphism is not well defined yet (Calascibetta ). 5-Fluorouracil is a fundamental drug in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer, and TS levels are considered an important factor for explaining the differences in 5-fluorouracil antitumour activity (Popat ). Therefore, the TS functional polymorphisms are under investigation for the possibility of optimising chemotherapy (Yong and Innocenti, 2007). Studies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer showed that carriers of the TS 5′-UTR 3R (3G) and/or the TS 3′-UTR 6+ alleles had adverse clinical outcomes (Pullarkat ; Etienne ; Park ; Marcuello ; Stoehlmacher ; Martinez-Balibrea ); however, such an association was not always detected (Lecomte ; Jakobsen ; Ruzzo , 2007b). Heterogeneity in clinical experimental conditions (Sorbye ), in tumour burden (Köhne ) and in genetic/molecular features in the presence of a multisite metastatic disease (Yokota, 2000) may explain variable results in these pharmacogenetic studies. We hypothesised that the 20–30% of patients with liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) (Mandalà ) may represent a favourably homogeneous and clinically relevant setting for evaluating the role of TS polymorphisms for predicting response to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. For this purpose, we performed an analysis of TS polymorphisms in patients with liver-only MCRC who were previously enrolled in two prospective pharmacogenetic studies including 312 patients treated with first-line FOLFOX (bolus/infusional 5-fluorouracil coupled with oxaliplatin) or FOLFIRI (bolus/infusional 5-fluorouracil coupled with irinotecan) regimens (Ruzzo , 2007b). FOLFOX and FOLFIRI regimens are equally active and they produce comparable response rates in first-line chemotherapy. In both the regimens, 5-fluorouracil is used at the same dose and schedule (Colucci ). The primary end point of the study was the association between TS polymorphism and tumour response.

Materials and methods

Study population

Three hundred and twelve patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were prospectively enrolled in two previous pharmacogenetic studies (Ruzzo , 2007b) and they underwent first-line chemotherapy including leucovorin 100 mg m−2 administered as a 2-h infusion before 5-fluorouracil 400 mg m−2 administered as an intravenous bolus injection and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg m−2 as a 22-h infusion immediately after FU bolus injection on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks. Eighty patients (25.6%) had liver-only metastatic disease and they were included in this analysis. Ten of the 80 patients had history of liver surgery for metastasectomy and they were with liver-only relapse. The 80 studied patients had cytologically or histologically confirmed metastatic colorectal cancer and the presence of at least one measurable lesion. Pretreatment evaluation included a complete medical and clinical–physical examination, KPS evaluation, baseline measurement of tumour size based on CT scan, serum chemistries and CEA. Objective response was evaluated after four cycles of treatment and then every 2 months according to the RECIST criteria (Therasse ). For the purpose of this study, radiology studies of the 80 patients were reviewed for confirming the treatment outcomes. Patients’ characteristics and their outcomes were unknown to investigators performing genetic analyses. The study was approved by local ethical committees and patients provided signed informed consent.

Analysis of polymorphisms

A blood sample from each enrolled patient was used for genotyping and it was collected before starting chemotherapy. Genomic DNA was extracted from 200 μl whole blood using the QiaAmp kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). All polymorphisms were investigated using a PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism technique. The assays for studying polymorphisms were performed as described previously (Ruzzo , 2007b).

Statistical analyses

The primary end point of the study was the association between TS polymorphisms in patients with liver-only MCRC and response to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Genotype frequencies were checked for agreement with those expected under the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Genotypes for each polymorphism were analysed as three-group categorical variable in a codominant model and they were also grouped according to the recessive and additive model. Patients were categorised as responders (patients with complete or partial response) and non-responders (patients with stable disease or disease progression). The χ2-test was used for comparing proportions. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05. A Bonferroni correction of the P-value for multiple comparisons was used where applicable. The SHEsis software platform (http://202.120.7.14/analysis/myAnalysis.php) was used to estimate haplotype frequencies and the presence of linkage disequilibrium (LD). Linkage disequilibrium exists between two SNPs, if their variants appear together more often than expected (non-random inheritance). Linkage disequilibrium was estimated using r2, with r2=1 indicating complete LD and r2=0 indicating absent LD. Haplotype frequencies were reconstructed in the study population of responders and non-responders. Association of haplotypes with clinical outcome was estimated by comparing haplotype distributions among dichotomised patients using the χ2-test.

Results

The characteristics of the 80 studied patients and the overall frequencies of genotypes are shown in Table 1. All patients were assessable for response and they received a minimum of four cycles of chemotherapy. In the 80 patients, there was one complete response (1.2%), 33 partial responses (41.2%), 30 stable diseases (37.6%) and 16 progressions (20%). Median age was 63 years (minimum 38 years and maximum 75 years). Liver metastases were synchronous in 22 patients (27.5%) and metachronous in 68 patients (72.5%). The frequencies of genotypes are in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and they are consistent with those observed in Caucasian ethnicity (Archive of Genetic Association Studies accessible at: http://geneticassociationdb.nih.gov/).
Table 1

Characteristics of the 80 patients and genotype frequencies

  No. of patients (%)
Sex
 Male48 (60)
 Female32 (40)
  
Karnofsky performance status
 90–10058 (72)
 8022 (28)
  
Resected primary tumour
 Yes70 (87)
 No10 (13)
  
Prior adjuvant therapy
 None44 (55)
 Yes36 (45)
  
Carcinoembryonic antigen
 ⩽10 ng ml−156 (70)
 >10 ng ml−124 (30)
  
Genotypes
TS 5′-UTR VNTRa
  2R/2R16 (20)
  2R/3R38 (47)
  3R/3R26 (33)
  
TS 5′-UTR VNTR+G/Cb
  2R/2R, 2R/3C, 3C/3C48 (60)
  2R/3G, 3C/3G, 3G/3G32 (40)
  
TS 3′-UTR
  −6/−630 (38)
  −6/+640 (50)
  +6/+610 (12)

The variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) polymorphism is a two (2R) or three (3R) 28-bp tandem repeat sequence in TS 5′-UTR.

A single-nucleotide change in 3R allele is a second polymorphism that distinguishes 3G carriers (2R/3G, 3G/3G and 3G/3C genotypes) from non-3G carriers (2R/2R, 2R/3C and 3C/3C genotypes).

No significant association between clinicopathological features and tumour response was found (Table 2). The analysis of the three polymorphisms and response is shown in Table 3. The Bonferroni-adjusted P-value for the three comparisons is 0.05/3, P=0.016. The TS 5′-UTR VNTR with G/C polymorphism in 3R alleles showed association with treatment outcome (P=0.011). In particular, high TS expression genotypes (2R/3G, 3C/3G and 3G/3G) were found in 8 out of 34 patients with complete or partial response (23.5%) and 24 out of 46 patients with stable disease and disease progression (52%). The 5′-UTR VNTR and the 3′-UTR 6-bp insertion/deletion (6+/6−) did not show association with tumour response. To further evaluate these two variants, their distribution was explored in recessive and additive models also, but without finding significant associations (Table 4).
Table 2

Characteristics of the patients and tumour response

   No. of patients (%)
 
Characteristics No. of patients (%) Respondersa (N=34) Non-respondersa (N=46) P-value
Karnofsky performance status
 90–10058 (72)26 (76)32 (70)0.6
 8022 (28)8 (24)14 (30) 
     
Resected primary tumour
 Yes67 (84)30 (88)37 (80)0.5
 No13 (16)4 (12)9 (20) 
     
Prior adjuvant therapy
 None44 (55)21 (62)23 (50)0.4
 Yes36 (45)13 (38)23 (50) 
     
Carcinoembryonic antigen
 ⩽10 ng ml−156 (70)26 (76)30 (65)0.4
 >10 ng ml−124 (30)8 (24)16 (35) 

Responders are patients with complete or partial response. Non-responders are patients with stable disease or disease progression.

Table 3

Association between genotypes and response to chemotherapy in the 80 patients

   No. of patients (%)
 
Genotypes No. of patients (%) Respondersa (N=34) Non-respondersa (N=46) P-value
TS 5′-UTR
2R/2R16 (20)10 (30)6 (13) 
2R/3R38 (47)14 (40)24 (52)0.19
3R/3R26 (33)10 (30)16 (35) 
     
TS 5′-UTR b
2R/2R, 2R/3C, 3C/3C48 (60)26 (76)22 (48)0.011§
2R/3G, 3C/3G, 3G/3G32 (40)8 (24)24 (52) 
     
TS 3′-UTR
 −6/−630 (38)11 (32)19 (41) 
 −6/+640 (50)20 (59)20 (44)0.37
 +6/+610 (12)3 (9)7 (15) 

Responders are patients with complete or partial response. Non-Responders are patients with stable disease or disease progression.

Analysis of the TS 5′-UTR VNTR with C/G nucleotide change in 3R allele carriers. Low-expression genotypes are 2R/2R, 2R/3C and 3C/3C. High-expression genotypes are 2R/3G, 3G/3G and 3G/3C.

P<0.016 is the level of significance according to the Bonferroni adjustment for three comparisons.

Table 4

Association between genotypes and response to chemotherapy in additive and recessive models

   No. of patients (%)
 
Genotypes No. of patients (%) Respondersa (N=34) Non-respondersa (N=46) P-value
TS 5′-UTR
Recessive model
  2R/2R, 2R/3R54 (67)24 (70)30 (65)0.63
  3R/3R26 (33)10 (30)16 (35) 
     
TS 5′-UTR
Additive model
  2R/2R16 (20)10 (30)6 (13)0.09
  2R/3R, 3R/3R64 (80)24 (70)40 (87) 
     
TS 3′-UTR
Recessive model
  −6/−6, −6/+670 (87)31 (91)39 (85)0.50
  +6/+610 (13)3 (9)7 (15) 
     
TS 3′-UTR
Additive model
  −6/−630 (38)11 (32)19 (41)0.48
  −6/+6, +6+650 (62)23 (68)27 (59) 

Responders are patients with complete or partial response. Non-responders are patients with stable disease or disease progression.

The TS 5′-UTR and TS 3′-UTR loci showed mild LD (r2=0.17). As shown in Table 5, non-3G haplotypes were prevalent in responders and 3G haplotypes in non-responders, with significantly different distribution of the 3G/6− haplotype.
Table 5

Distribution of estimated haplotype frequencies according to treatment outcome

Haplotype Non-responders (%) Responders (%) χ 2
2R/67.39.70.3
2R/6+32.541.30.06
3C/68.99.60.7
3C/6+16.319.90.2
3G/626.216.90.01
3G/6+6.25.20.5
Eleven responsive patients underwent liver surgery for resection of the residual metastatic disease (13.7%). Clear resection margins with removal of all known metastatic lesions were attained in these patients, with 10 of them carrying one of the low TS expression genotypes (2R/2R, 2R/3C and 3C/3C). At the time of data analysis (March 2008), 78 patients suffered from disease progression (97.5%). For addressing an exploratory analysis of time to progression in patients with high and low TS expression genotypes, time to event distributions were studied using the Kaplan–Meier method. As shown in Figure 1, the results support the influence of the TS 5′-UTR VNTR with G/C SNP on the outcome of these patients.
Figure 1

Kaplan–Meier analysis of time to progression (TTP) in patients with low TS expression genotypes (2R/2R, 2R/3C and 3C/3C) and high TS expression genotypes (2R/3G, 3C/3G and 3G/3G). TTP was calculated from the start of chemotherapy to the first evidence of disease progression. Two patients who underwent resection of liver metastases were progression-free at the time of analysis (one with a low TS expression genotype and the other with a high TS expression genotype). χ2 of the log-rank test=10.4 (P=0.001).

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first analysis of TS polymorphisms in patients with liver-only MCRC. In comparison with previous studies (Pullarkat ; Etienne ; Park ; Lecomte ; Marcuello ; Stoehlmacher ; Jakobsen ; Martinez-Balibrea ; Ruzzo , 2007b), we evaluated a homogeneous and low-burden disease population that was exposed to the same regimen of 5-fluorouracil including both bolus and infusional administration of the drug (Hoshino ). Heterogeneity in clinical features in patients with metastatic disease (Sorbye ) may represent a major limitation for observing actual pharmacogenetic effects of functional germline polymorphisms. Notably, the number of metastatic sites plays a relevant prognostic role in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (Köhne ), and differences in clinical outcomes can be observed between patients with different metastatic sites (Köhne ). The planning of this study was also motivated by the fact that colorectal cancer commonly metastasises to the liver, and such a single-organ involvement, instead of a multisite metastatic disease, can accurately be monitored during chemotherapy for the assessment of response (Trillet-Lenoir ). Low-burden metastatic disease may also limit the impact of heterogeneity in molecular/genetic alterations as they accumulate during tumour progression and metastatisation (Yokota, 2000). Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is to be included among these possible genetic changes. Owing to LOH at the TS locus on chromosome 18 in cancer cells, carriers of the germline heterozygous 2R/3R genotype can acquire the 2R/loss genotype in their tumours (Kawakami ; Uchida , 2004b). Therefore, the lower responsiveness of germline 2R/3R carriers could not be displayed because heterozygous patients with tumour 2R/loss genotype behave as 2R/2R patients (Uchida , 2004b). This phenomenon implies that responsiveness to 5-fluorouracil-based therapy may depend on the tumour rather than on the germline status of the genotypes (Uchida , 2004b). However, our findings suggest that the double assessment of the VNTR plus G/C nucleotide change with dichotomisation of patients into carriers of high (2R/3G, 3C/3G and 3G/3G) and low (2R/2R, 2R/3C and 3C/3C) TS expression genotypes may not suffer from the possible presence of LOH. The finding of the association between TS 5′-UTR VNTR+G/C and tumour response may not only reflect a better functional characterisation of 3C and 3G alleles, but also a less extensive influence of tumour LOH on the germline assessment for high-TS expression genotypes (2R/3G, 3C/3G and 3G/3G). In our opinion, TS polymorphisms deserved the present investigation more than other genetic variants with putative influence on 5-fluorouracil activity (i.e. methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms). In addition to the fact that TS is the target enzyme of 5-fluorouracil, it has been observed that TS levels may be dynamic, with upregulation after fluoropyrimidine exposure (Uchida , 2004b; Mauritz ). In particular, this effect was described in liver metastases from colorectal cancer in patients who received bolus 5-fluorouracil (Mauritz ). Therefore, TS polymorphisms may influence the outcome to 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy, not only for their role in determining different baseline levels of TS activity (Marsh, 2005), but also for modulating the enhancement of TS levels in response to 5-fluorouracil. In fact, the 5-fluorouracil-induced upregulation of TS mRNA may be greater in carriers of high-expression TS genotypes than in carriers of low-expression TS genotypes. We cannot rule out, however, that a double assessment of TS and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms may improve the predictive role of the single analysis of TS polymorphisms. Another reason for studying pharmacogenetics in liver-only MCRC patients is related to the lack of predictive factor for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Liver surgery can provide long-term survival for liver-only, metastatic colorectal cancer patients, but liver metastasectomy is feasible in only 15–25% of the patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can provide response rates as high as 50%, allowing liver metastasectomy in about 10–15% of patients initially deemed unresectable. Tumour response to preoperative chemotherapy seems to be associated with outcome following liver resection for colorectal metastases (Folprecht ) and, if genetically predictable, it could be improved by the selective choice of available drugs. In this study, 10 of the 11 responsive patients who underwent liver surgery were carriers of low TS expression genotypes (2R/2R, 2R/3C and 3C/3C). Actually, we performed an analysis of TS polymorphisms for response to 5-fluorouracil and we did not address this study to pharmacogenetics for liver metastases resectability and survival after preoperative chemotherapy. These end points require a prospective study, including a baseline multidisciplinary evaluation of the unresectable liver disease and long-term follow-up. In conclusion, the homogeneous subgroup of patients with liver-only metastatic disease allowed the predictive role of TS polymorphisms to stand out. In fact, the association between polymorphisms and tumour response was included in the secondary end points of our two previous pharmacogenetic studies (Ruzzo , 2007b), but these analyses failed to demonstrate a predictive role for the genetic variants. The clinical setting assumes a relevant role for exploring the pharmacogenetic associations in patients with metastatic cancer and additional studies are warranted for confirming our findings.
  36 in total

1.  Combined analysis of genetic polymorphisms in thymidylate synthase, uridine diphosphate glucoronosyltransferase and X-ray cross complementing factor 1 genes as a prognostic factor in advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin or irinotecan.

Authors:  Eva Martinez-Balibrea; Jose Luis Manzano; Anna Martinez-Cardus; Teresa Moran; Beatriz Cirauqui; Silvia Catot; Miguel Taron; Albert Abad
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Pharmacogenetic profiling in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with first-line FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy.

Authors:  Annamaria Ruzzo; Francesco Graziano; Fotios Loupakis; Eliana Rulli; Emanuele Canestrari; Daniele Santini; Vincenzo Catalano; Rita Ficarelli; Paolo Maltese; Renato Bisonni; Gianluca Masi; Gaia Schiavon; Paolo Giordani; Lucio Giustini; Alfredo Falcone; Giuseppe Tonini; Rosarita Silva; Rodolfo Mattioli; Irene Floriani; Mauro Magnani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Thymidylate synthase gene polymorphism predicts response to capecitabine in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  David J Park; Jan Stoehlmacher; Wu Zhang; Denice Tsao-Wei; Susan Groshen; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Thymidylate synthase pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  Sharon Marsh
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  A novel single nucleotide polymorphism within the 5' tandem repeat polymorphism of the thymidylate synthase gene abolishes USF-1 binding and alters transcriptional activity.

Authors:  Michael V Mandola; Jan Stoehlmacher; Susan Muller-Weeks; Gregory Cesarone; Mimi C Yu; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Robert D Ladner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Loss of heterozygosity at the thymidylate synthase (TS) locus on chromosome 18 affects tumor response and survival in individuals heterozygous for a 28-bp polymorphism in the TS gene.

Authors:  Kazumi Uchida; Kazuhiko Hayashi; Kazuyuki Kawakami; Sylke Schneider; Ji Min Yochim; Hidekazu Kuramochi; Ken Takasaki; Kathleen D Danenberg; Peter V Danenberg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Thymidylate synthase expression and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sanjay Popat; Athena Matakidou; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mario Mandalà; Stefania Mosconi; Antonello Quadri; Laura Milesi; Roberto Labianca
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.512

9.  Prognostic value of tumoral thymidylate synthase and p53 in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving fluorouracil-based chemotherapy: phenotypic and genotypic analyses.

Authors:  Marie-Christine Etienne; Maurice Chazal; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Nicolas Magné; Christophe Rosty; Jean-Louis Formento; Mireille Francoual; Patricia Formento; Nicole Renée; Emmanuel Chamorey; André Bourgeon; Jean-François Seitz; Jean-Robert Delpero; Christian Letoublon; Denis Pezet; Gérard Milano
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A multivariate analysis of genomic polymorphisms: prediction of clinical outcome to 5-FU/oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy in refractory colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Stoehlmacher; D J Park; W Zhang; D Yang; S Groshen; S Zahedy; H-J Lenz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

1.  Amplification of thymidylate synthetase in metastatic colorectal cancer patients pretreated with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Roshawn G Watson; Filipe Muhale; Leigh B Thorne; Jinsheng Yu; Bert H O'Neil; Janelle M Hoskins; Michael O Meyers; Allison M Deal; Joseph G Ibrahim; Michael L Hudson; Christine M Walko; Howard L McLeod; James T Auman
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 2.  Pharmacogenetics research on chemotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer over the last 20 years.

Authors:  Mariusz Panczyk
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Multifactorial pharmacogenetic analysis in colorectal cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil-based therapy together with cetuximab-irinotecan.

Authors:  Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Louis Formento; Jean-Yves Douillard; Mireille Francoual; Isabelle Hennebelle; Etienne Chatelut; Eric Francois; Roger Faroux; Chaza El Hannani; Jacques-Henri Jacob; Gérard Milano
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  An integrated analysis of the association between Ts gene polymorphisms and clinical outcome in gastric and colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-FU-based regimens.

Authors:  Ying-Chao Wang; Hui-Ping Xue; Zhen-Hua Wang; Jing-Yuan Fang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Potentially functional SNPs (pfSNPs) as novel genomic predictors of 5-FU response in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Jingbo Wang; Xu Wang; Mingjue Zhao; Su Pin Choo; Sin Jen Ong; Simon Y K Ong; Samuel S Chong; Yik Ying Teo; Caroline G L Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Integrating TYMS, KRAS and BRAF testing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Anastasios Ntavatzikos; Aris Spathis; Paul Patapis; Nikolaos Machairas; George Peros; Stefanos Konstantoudakis; Danai Leventakou; Ioannis G Panayiotides; Petros Karakitsos; Anna Koumarianou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Pharmacogenomic Markers of Methotrexate Response in the Consolidation Phase of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treatment.

Authors:  Nikola Kotur; Jelena Lazic; Bojan Ristivojevic; Biljana Stankovic; Vladimir Gasic; Lidija Dokmanovic; Nada Krstovski; Goran Milosevic; Dragana Janic; Branka Zukic; Sonja Pavlovic
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Predictive diagnostics in colorectal cancer: impact of genetic polymorphisms on individual outcomes and treatment with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Heidi Schwarzenbach
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 6.543

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.