Literature DB >> 17401013

Pharmacogenetic profiling in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with first-line FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy.

Annamaria Ruzzo1, Francesco Graziano, Fotios Loupakis, Eliana Rulli, Emanuele Canestrari, Daniele Santini, Vincenzo Catalano, Rita Ficarelli, Paolo Maltese, Renato Bisonni, Gianluca Masi, Gaia Schiavon, Paolo Giordani, Lucio Giustini, Alfredo Falcone, Giuseppe Tonini, Rosarita Silva, Rodolfo Mattioli, Irene Floriani, Mauro Magnani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective is to investigate whether polymorphisms with putative influence on fluorouracil/oxaliplatin activity are associated with clinical outcomes of patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with first-line oxaliplatin, folinic acid, and fluorouracil palliative chemotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled onto medical oncology units in Central Italy. Patients were required to have cytologically/histologically confirmed metastatic disease with at least one measurable lesion. Peripheral blood samples were used for genotyping 12 polymorphisms in thymidylate synthase, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD), excision repair cross complementing group 1 (ERCC1), x-ray cross complementing group 1, x-ray cross complementing protein 3, glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) genes. The primary end point of the study was to investigate the association between genotypes and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: In 166 patients, ERCC1-118 T/T, XPD-751 A/C, and XPD-751 C/C genotypes were independently associated with adverse PFS. The presence of two risk genotypes (ERCC1-118 T/T combined with either XPD-751 A/C or XPD-751 C/C) occurred in 50 patients (31%). This profiling showed an independent role for unfavorable PFS with a hazard ratio of 2.84% and 95% CI of 1.47 to 5.45 (P = .002). Neurotoxicity was significantly associated with GSTP1-105 A/G. Carriers of the GSTP1-105 G/G genotype were more prone to suffer from grade 3 neurotoxicity than carriers of GSTP1-105 A/G and GSTP1-105 A/A genotypes.
CONCLUSION: A pharmacogenetic approach may be an innovative strategy for optimizing palliative chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. These findings deserve confirmation in additional prospective studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17401013     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.1844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  91 in total

Review 1.  Part 1: background, methodology, and clinical adoption of pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  Maarten J Deenen; Annemieke Cats; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-05-31

2.  TS gene polymorphisms are not good markers of response to 5-FU therapy in stage III colon cancer patients.

Authors:  A Fariña-Sarasqueta; M J E M Gosens; E Moerland; I van Lijnschoten; V E P P Lemmens; G D Slooter; H J T Rutten; Adriaan J C van den Brule
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.730

3.  Pharmacogenetics of oxaliplatin as adjuvant treatment in colon carcinoma: are single nucleotide polymorphisms in GSTP1, ERCC1, and ERCC2 good predictive markers?

Authors:  Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta; Gesina van Lijnschoten; Valery E P P Lemmens; Harm J T Rutten; Adriaan J C van den Brule
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 4.  Progress in the development of prognostic and predictive markers for gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Crystal S Denlinger; Steven J Cohen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2007-10

5.  Polymorphisms of MTHFR C677T and A1298C associated with survival in patients with colorectal cancer treated with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Chih-Ching Yeh; Ching-Yu Lai; Shih-Ni Chang; Ling-Ling Hsieh; Reiping Tang; Fung-Chang Sung; Yi-Kuei Lin
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  ERCC1 and ERCC2 polymorphisms predict clinical outcomes of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapies in gastric and colorectal cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ming Yin; Jingrong Yan; Eva Martinez-Balibrea; Francesco Graziano; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Hyo-Jin Kim; Jacques Robert; Seock-Ah Im; Wei-Shu Wang; Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Platinum-induced neurotoxicity and preventive strategies: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Abolfazl Avan; Tjeerd J Postma; Cecilia Ceresa; Amir Avan; Guido Cavaletti; Elisa Giovannetti; Godefridus J Peters
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-03-12

8.  Validation study of a prognostic classification in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received irinotecan-based second-line chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kohei Shitara; Satoshi Yuki; Kentaro Yamazaki; Yoichi Naito; Hiraku Fukushima; Yoshito Komatsu; Hirofumi Yasui; Toshimi Takano; Kei Muro
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in combination as first- or second-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer: a Wisconsin Oncology Network trial.

Authors:  U O Njiaju; A J Tevaarwerk; K Kim; J E Chang; R M Hansen; T L Champeny; A M Traynor; S Meadows; L Van Ummersen; K Powers; J A Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  The increasing role of pharmacogenetics in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Suayib Yalçin
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.