PURPOSE: This study explored aspects of stigmatization for older adults who live in residential care or assisted living (RC-AL) communities and what these settings have done to address stigma. DESIGN AND METHODS: We used ethnography and other qualitative data-gathering and analytic techniques to gather data from 309 participants (residents, family and staff) from six RC-AL settings in Maryland. We entered the transcript data into Atlas.ti 5.0. We analyzed the data by using grounded theory techniques for emergent themes. RESULTS: Four themes emerged that relate to stigma in RC-AL: (a) ageism in long-term care; (b) stigma as related to disease and illness; (c) sociocultural aspects of stigma; and (d) RC-AL as a stigmatizing setting. Some strategies used in RC-AL settings to combat stigma include family member advocacy on behalf of stigmatized residents, assertion of resident autonomy, and administrator awareness of potential stigmatization. IMPLICATIONS: Findings suggest that changes could be made to the structure as well as the process of care delivery to minimize the occurrence of stigma in RC-AL settings. Structural changes include an examination of how best, given the resident case mix, to accommodate care for persons with dementia (e.g., separate units or integrated care); processes of care include staff recognition of resident preferences and strengths, rather than their limitations.
PURPOSE: This study explored aspects of stigmatization for older adults who live in residential care or assisted living (RC-AL) communities and what these settings have done to address stigma. DESIGN AND METHODS: We used ethnography and other qualitative data-gathering and analytic techniques to gather data from 309 participants (residents, family and staff) from six RC-AL settings in Maryland. We entered the transcript data into Atlas.ti 5.0. We analyzed the data by using grounded theory techniques for emergent themes. RESULTS: Four themes emerged that relate to stigma in RC-AL: (a) ageism in long-term care; (b) stigma as related to disease and illness; (c) sociocultural aspects of stigma; and (d) RC-AL as a stigmatizing setting. Some strategies used in RC-AL settings to combat stigma include family member advocacy on behalf of stigmatized residents, assertion of resident autonomy, and administrator awareness of potential stigmatization. IMPLICATIONS: Findings suggest that changes could be made to the structure as well as the process of care delivery to minimize the occurrence of stigma in RC-AL settings. Structural changes include an examination of how best, given the resident case mix, to accommodate care for persons with dementia (e.g., separate units or integrated care); processes of care include staff recognition of resident preferences and strengths, rather than their limitations.
Authors: K J Davis; P D Sloane; C M Mitchell; J Preisser; L Grant; M C Hawes; D Lindeman; R Montgomery; K Long; C Phillips; G Koch Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2000-02
Authors: Sheryl Zimmerman; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Philip D Sloane; J Kevin Eckert; J Richard Hebel; Leslie A Morgan; Sally C Stearns; Judith Wildfire; Jay Magaziner; Cory Chen; Thomas R Konrad Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2003-04
Authors: Sheryl Zimmerman; Philip D Sloane; Christianna S Williams; Debra Dobbs; Ratnavalli Ellajosyula; Alyssa Braaten; Marcia F T Rupnow; Daniel I Kaufer Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Candace L Kemp; Mary M Ball; Carole Hollingsworth; Molly M Perkins Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Erin G Roth; Lynn Keimig; Robert L Rubinstein; Leslie Morgan; J Kevin Eckert; Susan Goldman; Amanda D Peeples Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2012-03-05
Authors: Colleen R Bennett; Ann Christine Frankowski; Robert L Rubinstein; Amanda D Peeples; Rosa Perez; Mary Nemec; Gretchen G Tucker Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2017-04-01
Authors: Anjana Muralidharan; Whitney L Mills; Denise R Evans; Daryl Fujii; Victor Molinari Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 4.669