Literature DB >> 18727993

Gender differences in health-related quality of life among healthy aged and old-aged Austrians: cross-sectional analysis.

Sylvia Kirchengast1, Beatrix Haslinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although they experience lower mortality rates and lower rates of several chronic diseases than do their male counterparts, aging women are more likely to experience functional impairment in mobility and a general diminished health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The determinants of these gender differences have been the subject of controversy.
OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed gender differences in HRQoL in relation to social and biomedical factors such as age, marital status, educational level, and living arrangements.
METHODS: Participants were recruited via snowball sampling. All were healthy and lived independently in private homes. Data were obtained from personal interviews, based on a 30-item questionnaire, in the private homes of the participants. Additionally, HRQoL was assessed by means of the abbreviated version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) 26-item questionnaire, which contains 1 general health item, 1 general QoL item, and 24 specific items covering 4 broad domains: physical (DOM I), psychological (DOM II), social (DOM III), and environmental (DOM IV).
RESULTS: The participants (98 women, 62 men) enrolled in the study ranged in age from 57 to 95 years (mean [SD] age: 71.8 [8.6] years). The younger age group (aged 57-70 years) comprised 54 women and 25 men, and the older age group (aged >70 years) comprised 44 women and 37 men. Women aged < or =70 years rated their health and QoL significantly higher than did men in the same age group (P = 0.02). These women rated physical capacity (DOM I), social relationships (DOM III), and environment (DOM IV) higher, but not statistically significantly different, than did same-aged men. Women and men exhibited nearly identical psychological health (DOM II) values. Physical capacity (DOM I) differed significantly between women and men aged >70 years (P = 0.03). Women aged >70 years rated their QoL lower than their male counterparts did, although not significantly so. These women depended more on medical treatment, felt significantly less safe in everyday life (P = 0.03), and were less satisfied with themselves. The results of the multiple regression analyses suggest that gender may have a significant impact on general QoL for both age groups (P < 0.01 for the younger age group; P > 0.04 for the older age group). In these analyses, gender also had a significant impact on 2 domains, physical capacity and social relationships (P < 0.02 for both domains), among the participants of the younger age group.
CONCLUSION: Depending on the age group (< or =70 vs >70 years) in this small sample of Austrian women and men, gender influenced HRQoL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18727993     DOI: 10.1016/j.genm.2008.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gend Med        ISSN: 1550-8579


  25 in total

1.  Effect of vertebral fractures on function, quality of life and hospitalisation the AGES-Reykjavik study.

Authors:  Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Thor Aspelund; Brynjolfur Y Jonsson; Brynjolfur Mogensen; Lenore J Launer; Tamara B Harris; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Vilmundur Gudnason
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 10.668

2.  Factors associated with subjective quality of life in Korean patients with depressive disorders: the CRESCEND study.

Authors:  Young-Eun Jung; Ho-Jun Seo; Hoo Rim Song; Young Sup Woo; Hyeon-Woo Yim; Hyung-Mo Sung; Min-Soo Lee; Jae-Min Kim; Tae-Youn Jun
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Gender-based profiling of Quality of Life (QOL) of primary health care (PHC) attendees in central Uganda: a cross sectional analysis.

Authors:  W W Muhwezi; E S Okello; A K Turiho
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.927

4.  Nutritional status in chronically-ill elderly patients. Is it related to quality of life?

Authors:  R Artacho; C Lujano; A B Sanchez-Vico; C Vargas Sánchez; J González Calvo; P R Bouzas; M D Ruiz-López
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Age and gender differences in health-related quality of life of children and adolescents in Europe: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Gisela Michel; Corinna Bisegger; Daniela C Fuhr; Thomas Abel
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Variables associated with communicative participation in Parkinson's disease and its relationship to measures of health-related quality-of-life.

Authors:  Megan J McAuliffe; Carolyn R Baylor; Kathryn M Yorkston
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.484

7.  The aging profile of the Portuguese population: a principal component analysis.

Authors:  Vitor Rodrigues; Anabela Mota-Pinto; Bruno de Sousa; Amália Botelho; Catarina Alves; Catarina Resende de Oliveira
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-08

8.  A prospective analysis of dietary fiber intake and mental health quality of life in the Iowa Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Seth Ramin; Margaret A Mysz; Katie Meyer; Benjamin Capistrant; DeAnn Lazovich; Anna Prizment
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2019-10-13       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Sex Differences in Quality of Life in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Meenakshi Jolly; Winston Sequeira; Joel A Block; Sergio Toloza; Ana Bertoli; Ivanna Blazevic; Luis M Vila; Ioana Moldovan; Karina D Torralba; Davide Mazzoni; Elvira Cicognani; Sarfaraz Hasni; Berna Goker; Seminur Haznedaroglu; Josiane Bourre-Tessier; Sandra V Navarra; Chi Chiu Mok; Michael Weisman; Ann E Clarke; Daniel Wallace; Graciela Alarcón
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.794

10.  Quality of life of patients with neurodermatitis.

Authors:  Jin-Gang An; Yan-Ting Liu; Sheng-Xiang Xiao; Jun-Min Wang; Song-Mei Geng; Ying-Ying Dong
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.