Literature DB >> 29693320

Sex Differences in Quality of Life in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Meenakshi Jolly1, Winston Sequeira1, Joel A Block1, Sergio Toloza2, Ana Bertoli3, Ivanna Blazevic4, Luis M Vila5, Ioana Moldovan6, Karina D Torralba7, Davide Mazzoni8, Elvira Cicognani8, Sarfaraz Hasni9, Berna Goker10, Seminur Haznedaroglu10, Josiane Bourre-Tessier11, Sandra V Navarra12, Chi Chiu Mok13, Michael Weisman14, Ann E Clarke15, Daniel Wallace14, Graciela Alarcón16.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) predominantly affects women. Clinical phenotype and outcomes in SLE may vary by sex and are further complicated by unique concerns that are dependent upon sex-defined roles. We aimed to describe sex differences in disease-specific quality of life (QoL) assessment scores using the Lupus Patient-Reported Outcome (LupusPRO) tool in a large international study.
METHODS: Cross-sectional data from 1,803 patients with SLE on demographics, self-identified sex status, LupusPRO, and disease activity were analyzed. The LupusPRO tool has 2 constructs: health-related QoL (HRQoL) and non-HRQoL. Disease activity and damage were evaluated using the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index, respectively. Nonparametric tests were used to compare QoL and disease activity by sex.
RESULTS: A total of 122 men and 1,681 women with SLE participated. The mean age was similar by sex, but the damage scores were greater among men. Men fared worse on the non-HRQoL social support domain than women (P = 0.02). When comparing disease and QoL among men and women ages ≤45 years, men were found to have greater damage and worse social support than women. However, women fared significantly worse on lupus symptoms, cognition, and procreation domains with trends for worse functioning on physical health and pain-vitality domains.
CONCLUSION: In the largest study of a diverse group of SLE patients, utilizing a disease-specific QoL tool, sex differences in QoL were observed on both HRQoL and non-HRQoL constructs. Although men performed worse in the social support domain, women (especially those in the reproductive age group) fared worse in other domains. These observations may assist physicians in appropriately addressing QoL issues in a sex-focused manner.
© 2018, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29693320      PMCID: PMC6202275          DOI: 10.1002/acr.23588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  29 in total

1.  Male SLE patients in Malta.

Authors:  F Camilleri; C Mallia
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  M C Hochberg
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1997-09

3.  Positive and problematic support, stress and quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Davide Mazzoni; Elvira Cicognani
Journal:  Anxiety Stress Coping       Date:  2016-01-27

4.  Consistency and validity of patient administered assessment of quality of life by the MOS SF-36; its association with disease activity and damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  T Stoll; C Gordon; B Seifert; K Richardson; J Malik; P A Bacon; D A Isenberg
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Can disease specific measures for systemic lupus erythematosus predict patients health related quality of life?

Authors:  M Jolly; T O Utset
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.911

6.  Effect of disease activity and damage on quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a 2-year prospective study.

Authors:  C C Mok; L Y Ho; M Y Cheung; K L Yu; C H To
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Cross-cultural validation of a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure for systemic lupus erythematosus in Canada.

Authors:  Josiane Bourré-Tessier; Ann E Clarke; Rachel A Mikolaitis-Preuss; Mark Kosinski; Sasha Bernatsky; Joel A Block; Meenakshi Jolly
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  Quality of life of patients with irritable bowel syndrome in Korea.

Authors:  Jae Myung Park; Myung-Gyu Choi; Yong Sung Kim; Chang Hwan Choi; Suck Chei Choi; Su Jin Hong; Jeong Jo Jeong; Dong Ho Lee; Joon Seong Lee; Kwang Jae Lee; Hee Jung Son; In Kyung Sung
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Problematic social support from patients' perspective: the case of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Davide Mazzoni; Elvira Cicognani
Journal:  Soc Work Health Care       Date:  2014

10.  Gender differences in a cohort of Puerto Ricans with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  A M Mayor; L M Vilá
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.770

View more
  7 in total

1.  Development of a digital toolkit to improve quality of life of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Jerik Leung; Laura Kloos; Alfred Hj Kim; Elizabeth A Baker
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2021-08-10

2.  The Problem of Pain in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Explication of the Role of Biopsychosocial Mechanisms.

Authors:  Titilola Falasinnu; Cristina Drenkard; Gaobin Bao; Sean Mackey; S Sam Lim
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 5.346

3.  Quality of life in lupus erythematosus female patients with cutaneous lesions in Antananarivo, Madagascar.

Authors:  Fandresena Arilala Sendrasoa; Tsiory Iarintsoa Razafimaharo; Léophonte Ramily; Mendrika Fifaliana Rakotoarisaona; Malalaniaina Andrianarison; Onivola Raharolahy; Volatantely Tobiniaina Ratovonjanahary; Naina Harinjara Razanakoto; Irina Mamisoa Ranaivo; Lala Soavina Ramarozatovo; Fahafahantsoa Rapelanoro Rabenja
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2021-07-31

Review 4.  Influence of Socio-Demographic Factors in Patients With Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Amanda M Walker; Grace Lu; Shari C Clifton; Motolani E Ogunsanya; Benjamin F Chong
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-11

5.  The impact of distress disclosure and anxiety on the association between social support and quality of life among Chinese women with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Rui-Chen Gao; Li Wu; Pei-Li Shi; Ni Sang; Min Hao; Guo-Cui Wu
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 5.435

6.  Predictors of stress in patients with Lupus.

Authors:  Meenakshi Jolly; Patricia Katz
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-29

7.  A Comparison of the Correlation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) with Health-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Ning-Sheng Lai; Ming-Chi Lu; Hsiu-Hua Chang; Hui-Chin Lo; Chia-Wen Hsu; Kuang-Yung Huang; Chien-Hsueh Tung; Bao-Bao Hsu; Cheng-Han Wu; Malcolm Koo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.