Ras pathway activation in gliomas: a strategic target for intranasal administration of perillyl alcohol.

INTRODUCTION: Targeted therapy directed at specific molecular alterations is already creating a shift in the treatment of cancer patients. Malignant gliomas commonly overexpress the oncogenes EGFR and PDGFR and contain mutations and deletions of the tumor suppressor genes PTEN and TP53. Some of these alterations lead to activation of the P13K/Akt and Ras/MAPK pathways, which provide targets for therapy. Perillyl alcohol (POH), the isoprenoid of greatest clinical interest, was initially considered to inhibit farnesyl protein transferase. Follow-up studies revealed that POH suppresses the synthesis of small G proteins, including Ras. Intranasal delivery allows drugs that do not cross the blood-brain barrier to enter the central nervous system. Moreover, it eliminates the need for systemic delivery, thereby reducing unwanted systemic side effects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Applying this method, a phase I/II clinical trial of POH was performed in patients with relapsed malignant gliomas after standard treatment: surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. POH was administrated in a concentration of 0.3% volume/volume (55 mg) four times daily in an interrupted administration schedule. The objective was to evaluate toxicity and progression-free survival (PFS) after six months of treatment. The cohort consisted of 37 patients, including 29 with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), 5 with grade III astrocytoma (AA), and 3 with anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO). Neurological examination and suitable image analysis (computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) established disease progression. Complete response was defined as neurological stability or improvement of conditions, disappearance of CT/MRI tumor image, and corticosteroid withdraw; partial response (PR) as > or =50 reduction of CT/MRI tumor image, neurological stability, or improvement of conditions and corticosteroid requirement; progressive course (PC) as > or =25 increase in CT/MRI tumor image or the appearance of a new lesion; and stable disease as a lack of any changes in the CT/MR tumor image or neurological status.
RESULTS: After six months of treatment, PR was observed in 3.4% (n=1) of the patients with GBM and 33.3% (n=1) with AO; stable disease in 44.8% (n=13) with GBM, 60% (n=3) with AA, and 33.3% (n=1) with AO; and PC in 51.7% (n=15) with GBM, 40% (n=2), with AA and 33.3% (n=1) AO. PFS (sum of PRs and stable disease) was 48.2% for GBM, 60% for AA, and 66.6% for AO patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results indicate that intranasal administration of the signal transduction inhibitor POH is a safe, noninvasive, and low-cost method. There were no toxicity events and the regression of tumor size in some patients is suggestive of antitumor activity.

Introduction

Gliomas form a heterogeneous group of tumors. In adult patients, most of these can be classified based on their histopathological features as astrocytic, oligodendroglial, oligoastrocytic, or ependymal tumors [6]. Additionally, a malignancy grade is attributed to these gliomas based on histopathological features including nuclear atypia, mitotic activity, microvascular proliferation, and necrosis. Although histopathological classification is still the gold standard guiding therapy of glioma patients, it is increasingly clear that different genetic subtypes exist within these subgroups and that specific molecular genetic changes are of prognostic significance. Molecular analysis revealed that genetic alterations and pathways may differ between the different histopathological types: whereas a gain of chromosome 7p and a loss of chromosome 10q are considered to be characteristic for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM; WHO grade IV astrocytoma — AA) [18], losses of 1p and 19q are most frequently detected in oligodendrogliomas [20]. In addition it was shown that different genetic subtypes exist even within the specific histopathological groups: secondary GBMs that develop via progression from a less malignant lesion frequently show p53 mutations, LOH 17p, and overexpression of PDGFR, while primary GBMs that occur without clinical evidence of a precursor lesion are often characterized by amplification or overexpression of EGFR [13].

For the above reasons, research efforts have focused on the investigation of molecular alterations in neoplastic glia, aiming at the identification of novel and more specific therapeutic targets. Such alterations often result from multiple mutations in proto-oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes [25], which encode for proteins that play important roles in signal transduction. In this context, recent discoveries have shed light on the molecular events driving glioma growth, including abnormalities of three major molecular pathways: extracellular growth factors and their receptors EGF/EGFR and PDGF/PDGFR and the signal transduction cascades Ras and AKT [21]. Therapies targeting these specific molecules may result in killing tumor cells effectively while keeping normal cells intact.

The Ras pathway as a target for glioma therapy

Ras is an integral signaling element and has been characterized as the primary switch that transmits external signals through numerous intracellular signaling pathways. In mammalian cells, three ras genes encode four Ras isoforms (H-Ras, K-Ras4A, K-Ras4B, and N-Ras) that are highly homologous but functionally distinct. Ras proteins are a class of nucleotide-binding proteins that play pivotal roles in the control of normal and transformed cell growth [26]. Experimental studies on Ras protein structure, function, and regulation indicate that they are key intermediates in signal transduction pathways that mediate proliferative and other types of signal largely upstream from receptor kinases, which control a wide variety of cellular processes including growth, differentiation, apoptosis, cytoskeletal organization, and membrane trafficking [28]. For Ras to transduce the extracellular signals provided by growth factors and cytokines, it must be associated with the inner surface of the plasma membrane. Ras proteins are a family of membrane-associated small GTPases that transmit signals from cell surface receptors such as EGFR, EGFRvIII, and PDGFR, promoting diverse cellular effects such as proliferation, survival, and angiogenesis [30]. The membrane anchorage of Ras, required for functional activity in signal transduction, is facilitated by post-translational modifications resulting in covalent attachment of a farnesyl group to the cysteine in the C-terminal CAAX motif. This attachment is mediated by farnesyltransferase (FTase). These lipophilic modifications facilitate the association of isoprenylated proteins with an intracellular membrane, which is a functional requirement. Farnesylation of Ras enhances its ability to stimulate downstream signaling enzymes, including mitogen-activated protein kinase in mammalian cells. Unfarnesylated Ras proteins do not associate the plasma membrane and are incapable of cellular transformation [6].

FTase inhibitors represent a new class of agents that target signal transduction pathways responsible for the proliferation and survival of diverse malignant cell types. Although these agents were developed to prevent a processing step necessary for membrane attachment and maturation of Ras proteins, recent studies suggest that FTase inhibitors block the farnesylation of additional cellular polypeptides, thereby exerting antitumor effects independent of the presence of activating ras gene mutations [21]. Even though GBMs do not display ras mutations, they may have enhanced expression of Ras. Also, GBMs expressed high levels of ligand-dependent and -independent growth factor (EGF and PDGF) receptors. Activation of these receptors leads to tyrosine kinases activation and functional up-regulation of the Ras signaling pathway or expresses the activated form of this protein [20]. Overexpression and activation of receptor tyrosine kinases, such as PDGFR and EGFR, lead to the proliferation of human malignant AA cells. Although oncogenic mutations affecting Ras are not prevalent in human malignant AAs, they might be elevated in these tumors secondary to the mitogenic signals originating from activated receptor tyrosine kinases [20]. Furthermore, blocking Ras activation by expression of the Ha-Ras-Asn dominant-negative mutant or by farnesyl transferase inhibitors decreased the in vitro proliferation of the human AA cell lines [14]. These results support the hypothesis that proliferative signals from receptor tyrosine kinases expressed by human malignant AA cells utilized the Ras mitogenic pathway [14]. Pharmacological inhibitors of the Ras pathway may therefore be of therapeutic value in these currently terminal tumors. Previous studies have demonstrated that AAs express elevated levels of activated Ras.GTP despite the absence of activating ras mutations [11]. Overall, the current data suggest that activation of the Ras signaling pathway in malignant gliomas is due to aberrant expression and overactivity of membrane tyrosine kinase receptors, including EGFR, PDGFR, FGFR, and IGF-IR.

Perillyl alcohol-inhibition of the Ras/MAPK pathway

The search for new chemotherapeutic drugs has increased, especially for those that have a natural origin. POH, also known as p-metha 1,7-diene-6-ol and sometimes as 4-isopropenyl-cyclohexenecarbinol, is composed of two isoprene units produced by the mevalonate pathway. Diverse mevalonate-derived products of secondary metabolic pathways present in plants have both chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive properties. The mevalonate pathway produces isoprenoids that are vital for diverse cellular functions, ranging from cholesterol synthesis to growth control. Several mechanisms for the feedback regulation of low-density-lipoprotein receptors and of two enzymes involved in mevalonate biosynthesis ensure the production of sufficient mevalonate for several end products [5]. Manipulation of this regulatory system could be useful in treating certain forms of cancer [10]. It has been found to be active in inducing apoptosis in tumor cells with no impact on normal cells and can in fact turn back tumor cells to a differentiated state [31].

Although the mechanism by which POH exerts its anti-cancer activity is not clear, a number of potentially important drug-related activities have been observed in preclinical studies, including cellular effects such as an early G1 arrest and the induction of apoptosis and biochemical effects such as the inhibition of post-translational modification of proteins involved in signal transduction. Indeed it has been postulated that the anti-carcinoma activity of POH involves a decrease in the levels of isoprenylated Ras and Ras-related proteins, thereby reducing the physiological functioning of these proteins [16]. Protein isoprenylation involves the post-translational modification of a protein by the covalent attachment of a lipophilic farnesyl isoprenoid group to a Cys residue at or near the carboxyl terminus. Isoprenoid substrates for prenylprotein transferase enzymes include farnesyl pyrophosphate plus geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate, two intermediates in the mevalonate pathway [1]. This action was widely attributed to the inhibition of farnesyl protein transferase activity. Farnesylation is the most critical part of the process that leads to the activation of Ras, and farnesyl transferase inhibitors exert their antitumor effect in part by inhibiting Ras-mediated signaling [22]. A study showed that on H-Ras vs. K-Ras farnesylation was inhibited by perillyl alcohol (POH) [30]. Also, follow-up studies revealed that POH suppresses the synthesis of small G proteins and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase [17].

Our experiments [7] showed that in vitro treatment with POH consistently inhibited proliferation, produced marked changes in cell morphology, inhibited protein synthesis, and caused marked alteration in membrane permeability and drastic changes in the cytoarchitecture of C6, U87MG, and A172 cells. We previously showed that with in vivo treatment of glioblastoma cells, POH showed inhibition of cell migration and anti-metastatic activity in the model of the chick embryo with the C6 cell line [31]. Such results indicate the chemotherapeutic action of POH by promoting cytotoxicity and arresting migration of murine and human glioblastoma cell lines. Also, another study of our group [12] showed that treatment of both human primary cultures and established cell lines of GBM (U87 and A172) with 1 mM of POH led to marked alterations in cell morphology, decreased cell viability, and death by apoptosis. Given the limited toxicity of POH in humans, its proven efficacy in several animal models, and its potential to inhibit Ha-ras farnesylation, we conducted a new method for POH administration, i.e. POH inhalation. This intranasal administration allows POH to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and reach the central nervous system (CNS), eliminating the need for systemic delivery and reducing the side effects.

Based on the favorable therapeutic ratio observed with in vitro and in vivo treatment, commercial availability, low cost, and low toxicity, we developed a phase I/II clinical trial that delivers POH by inhalation to patients with relapsed malignant gliomas. This trial was approved by the Brazilian Committee of Ethics and Research (CONEP 9681 no. 25000.009267/2004-25, July 12, 2004).

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the Ethics Council of Hospital Universitario Antonio Pedro-Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF). Informed consent was obtained from either the patient or next of kin.

Patient selection

To be selected, patients had to have histopathological diagnosis of malignant glioma. This was done during the first surgery. Thirty-seven patients with recurrent malignant gliomas were enrolled in this trial. No effective standard therapy was available for any patient who gave informed written consent for the POH protocol, according to CONEP 9681 no. 25000.009267/2004–25 approved on July 12, 2004. Patients with relapsed malignant gliomas, aged older than 18 years, had measurable contrast-enhancing tumor on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Karnofsky performance scale of 70% or higher, adequate bone marrow function, white blood cell count of 3000/µl or higher, absolute neutrophil count of 1500/µl or higher, platelet count of 100,000/µl or higher, hemoglobin of 8.0 g/dl or higher, bilirubin of 0.3 mg/dl or higher, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase not more than twice the upper normal limit (ULN), alkaline phosphatase not more than twice the ULN, and serum creatinine of 1.6 mg/dl or less as well as stable heart rhythm, no unstable angina, no clinical evidence of congestive heart failure, no radiation therapy or chemotherapy within 4 weeks of initiation of therapy, and no mitomycin or nitrosoureas within six weeks. Pregnant women, patients with hematological malignancy, and patients taking antiepileptic drugs known to be metabolized by the cytochrome P-450 system were excluded. Patients were not allowed to take cholesterol-lowering agents during the study.

Drug formulation

POH was supplied by Hospital Universitário Antonio Pedro-UFF and formulated for inhalation by the Pharmacia Universitária-UFF according to the BR Application Number 0107262-5 December 17, 2001.

Drug administration and dose escalation

Our previous study showed anti-metastatic activity of POH when C6 murine glial cells were exposed to concentrations of 0.3–0.03% POH [31]. Applying this concentration, our group studied POH intranasal administration in C57BL6 mice. This study showed that POH intranasal administration increased the lymphoid population in the broncoalveolar lavage and activated some of innate immunity, suggesting a possible role for POH as a chemotherapeutic drug also in pathological processes affecting the lung [29]. In our clinical trial all the patients received 0.3% v/v POH (55 mg) four times daily by intranasal delivery, totaling 220 mg/day. Owing to the efficacy of the intranasal delivery used in our trial, we decided to use 0.3% POH 55 mg four times daily as the first dose escalation.

Outcome

Complete response was defined as neurological stability or improvement of conditions, disappearance of computed tomography (CT)/MRI tumor image, and corticosteroid withdraw; partial response (PR) as ≥50% reduction of CT/MRI tumor image, neurological stability, or improvement of conditions and corticosteroid requirement; progressive course as ≥25% increase in CT/MRI tumor image or the appearance of a new lesion; and stable disease as a lack of any changes in the CT/MRI tumor image or neurological status.

Results

Patient characteristics

Thirty-seven patients with recurrent malignant gliomas were enrolled, including 29 patients with GBM, 5 patients with grade III AA, and 3 patients with anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO). The ages of the patients with GBM ranged from 38–62 (median: 50), with AA from 41–64 (median: 52.5), and with AO from 35–69 (median: 52) years. Before entering the clinical trial, all the patients received prior conventional therapy (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy), were out of therapeutic possibilities, and presented recurrence (Table 1).

Table 1

Patients’ characteristics

	GBM	AA	AO
	(n=29)	(n=5)	(n=3)
Age, years
median	50	52.5	52
range	38–62	41–64	35–69
Sex
male	19	3	1
female	10	2	2
Prior treatment regimens
prior radiotherapy	29	5	3
prior chemotherapy agents	29	5	3
anti-epileptic drug	29	5	3
prior corticosteroid intake	29	5	3
KPS
100	0	0	0
90	14	3	2
80	13	1	1
70	2	1	0

Abbreviations: Anti-epileptic drug — phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine; GBM — glioblastoma multiforme; AA — anaplastic astrocytoma; AO — anaplastic oligodendroglioma; KPS — Karnofsky performance status.

With a medium follow-up of 48 weeks, the six-month progression-free survival (PFS; partial responses and stable disease) rate for the patients with GBM was 48.2% patients (Table 2 and Fig. 1). Patients with AA and AO had a significantly better rate than the patients with GBM (Fig. 1). Time to progression and overall survival were measured from treatment initiation and analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method including 95% confidence intervals (Fig. 2).

Table 2

Parameters of efficacy in six months of POH treatment in patients with malignant gliomas

	GBM	AA	AO
	(n=29)	(n=5)	(n=3)
Follow-up, weeks	48	48	56
Six-month progression-free survival	48.2%	60%	66.6%
Radiographic responses
complete responses	0	0	0
partial responses	1	0	1
stable disease	13	3	1
progressive disease	15	2	1
Patients w/no corticosteroid intake
at 6 month	0	0	0
1 year	1	0	1

Fig. 1

Progression-free survival (sum of patients with partial response and stable disease) for all 37 patients treated with POH intranasal delivery. The median PFS rate was 48.2% for patients with GBM, 60% for patients with AA and 66.6% for patients with AO. Abbreviation: GBM — glioblastoma multiforme; AA — anaplastic astrocytoma; AO — anaplastic oligodendroglioma; PD — progressive disease; PR — partial response; SD — stable disease.

Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS for patients with GBM and AA.

In the 29 patients with GBM, 13 showed stable disease and 15 showed PD (Fig. 3 and Table 2). All patients were were receiving corticosteroids 4 mg/6 h orally before entering the clinical trial. The corticosteroid was maintained during POH treatment in all patients. The dose of corticosteroid was decreased in the patients who presented improvement of clinical status. One patient died decurrently of septic fever, three patients of pneumonia, and one patient of thromboembolism. In one patient with recurrent GBM after six months of treatment with POH and steroid therapy presented fever and seizures. CT scan revealed a brain abscess. The patient underwent a right temporal-parietal craniotomy for removal of both the abscess and the rest of the recurrent tumor. The anatomopathological examinations are show in Fig. 4. Tumor samples obtained from the first and second surgical procedures were analyzed by TUNEL assay. No apoptotic cells were detected in the sample from the first surgery. In contrast, cells positive for both TUNEL and caspase-3 were detected in the sample following POH treatment (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3

Response evaluation of a total of 37 patients on the sixth month. Twenty-nine patients with GBM: 1 with PR, 13 with SD and 15 with PD; 5 patients with AA: 3 with SD and 2 with PD; 3 patients with AO: 1 with PR, 1 with SD and 1 with PD.

Fig. 4

Apoptotic responses in human recurrent glioblastoma multiforme treated with intranasal administration of POH. A: initial GBM; B: Astrocytic tumor of the highest grade with dense cellularity and striking pleomorphism (HE×100); C, D: treated initial GBM by activated caspase-3 immunohistochemistry and terminal deoxynucleotidyl-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling (TUNEL). We found apoptotic cells in the treated tumor G: by activated caspase-3 immunohistochemistry and H: terminal deoxynucleotidyl-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling (TUNEL); E: computed tomography demonstrating a recurrent glioblastoma after radiation therapy and response to intranasal delivery of perillyl alcohol after 6 months treatment; F: scattered apoptotic cells (tumor cells) related to the areas with radiation and POH treatment effects (HE×400).

In the 5 patients with AA, 3 showed stable disease and 2 showed PD (Fig. 3 and Table 2). One patient with AO showed PR and remained alive without recurrence and no corticosteroids intake, 1 showed PD, and 1 showed stable disease (Fig. 3 and Table 2).

Toxicity of POH intranasal administration

All the patients were submitted to the toxicity tests required by National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 3 for this kind of clinical trial. Laboratory exams and images of the thorax, brain, and abdominal cavity were normal. Indeed, we now have 6 patients with more than one year of POH. None of them presents any signs of toxicity. POH intranasal delivery was well tolerated in all patients. No dose reduction or drug discontinuation was required for any of the study participants.

Discussion

Over the past three decades we have made great strides in the treatment of most, but not all, brain tumors. Dramatic advances have occurred in diagnostic imaging, neurosurgery, neuroanesthesia, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for CNS tumors. Unfortunately, our progress has not yet met our expectations. Because of the infiltrative nature of most primary brain tumors, neurosurgery can never be expected to be curative for the majority of gliomas. Because infiltrative tumors interdigitate with normal brain cells and are not highly sensitive to irradiation, one cannot expect radiotherapy to be curative without serious damage to normal brain cells. The hope for a cure, then, rests with chemotherapy. The ability to treat most advanced malignancies with classical cytotoxic DNA-damaging agents is limited, with little curative potential and rare durable remissions [15]. This has led to emphasis on the development of new therapeutic agents with novel mechanism of action.

Cancer researchers now have a unified concept to guide their search for specific genetic abnormalities. The genes and proteins that participate in the conversion of normal into malignant cells are also involved in the key processes that convert extracellular events that culminate in division and growth [27]. Malignant gliomas commonly overexpress EGF receptor and its ligand-independent mutant EGFRvIII. This results in signaling through the Ras-MAPK and PI3K/Akt pathways [23]. Data showing that POH inhibits the prenylation of Ras and other proteins in many cell types [30] indicate that POH may be effective against glioma cells. In fact, our in vitro and in vivo experiments showed that POH induced marked changes in cell morphology, induced apoptosis, and led to inhibition of angiogenesis and migration of glioma cell lines and explanted cells from a patient with GBM [7, 12, 31]. Also, studies from our group indicate that POH may induce regression in patients with GBM [8, 9]. Studies of phase I and II clinical trials with POH administered orally indicated that POH may have a tumoristatic effect and that the optimal schedule of administration would result from continuous drug exposure [2, 3]. However, these studies also showed toxicities, consisting of nausea, early satiety, eructation, and unpleasant taste as well as fatigue. The chronic nature of these toxicities led to problems with patient tolerance and compliance, suggesting that oral consumption of POH is an unpleasant experience for most patients. Our studies showed that the intranasal formulation of POH was generally well tolerated and relatively well absorbed. In some patients, this therapeutic strategy led to an increase in PFS and decrease in tumor size, as evidenced by MRI. It is interesting to note that in our study we investigated whether the partial regression observed in a patient with a recurrent GBM after treatment by intranasal delivery of POH four times daily, is mediated by apoptosis. Data from classical histology, terminal deoxynucleotidyl-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay, as well as activation of caspase-3, showed increased apoptosis in the treated tumor (Fig. 4).

A study [24] showed that temozolomide schedules deplete O6-methylguanine methyltransferase and may overcome chemoresistance. This study enrolled 19 patients (15 with anaplastic AA, 4 with AO) who received temozolomide (100 mg/m2/day for 21 consecutive days every 28-day cycle) at first recurrence, either until disease progression or for 12 cycles. Six-month PFS was 56%, comparing favorably with historic controls treated with the standard 5-day temozolomide schedule. Median survival was 12.9 months (95% confidence interval: 3.7–22 months). Among 15 evaluable patients, 2 had a complete or PR and 10 had stable disease. Grades 3 and 4 lymphopenia occurred in 53% and 47% of the patients, respectively. However, treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas with intranasal delivery of POH achieved at six-month PFS was 48.2% for patients with GBM, 60% for patients with AA, and 66.6% for patients with AO. It is important to note that after 12 months of treatment with POH by intranasal delivery, 3 patients with malignant gliomas presented with considerable reductions in tumor mass and compression effects and 2 patients, 1 with GBM and 1 with AO, ceased corticosteroid intake. There were no toxicity events.

A common property of brain tumors is their ability to cause edema in the surrounding brain. Edema forms as a result of a leaky BBB and persists when the brain fails to clear the excess fluid. It is a significant source of morbidity and mortality. Although the experimental use of POH intranasal delivery in patients with refractory high-grade malignant gliomas has indeed led to some clinical responses, MRI offers evidence that there is no regression in edema peritumoral (Figs. 5 and 6). druk-6.qxd 7/25/08 11:31 AM Page 273

Fig. 5

Preoperative MRI revealing the extent of the tumor in the right hemisphere (A). Computed tomography demonstrating a recurrence of tumor after surgery and radiation therapy (B). Response to intranasal delivery of POH after 3 (C) and 6 months (D) treatment. We can observe persistent peritumoral edema.

Fig. 6

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing the effect to intranasal delivery of POH treatment in a patient with relapsed glioblastoma. Note the persistent peritumoral edema between the initial MRI (A, D) and the follow-up performed after 6 months (B, E) and after 18 months (C, F) of treatment.

In summary, despite dramatic advances in the appreciation of the underlying molecular biology of malignant gliomas, we remain ignorant of many crucial aspects of glioma biology. Regulators of tumor invasion escape immune targeting and neo-angiogenesis remains to be elucidated. An invasive and hypoxic tumor shows resistance to traditional therapies and, probably, targeted therapies. It is increasingly evident that a greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms of gliomagenesis is needed to improve treatments for these patients. Rather than being paralyzed by these intricacies, the neuro-oncology community, pharmaceutical companies, and governmental regulatory agencies will need to attack these issues head-on. Success in changing the outcome of malignant glioma depends on refining our understanding of the biology and biochemistry of brain tumors, enabling us to develop new therapeutic opportunities against this disease.

In view of the fact that the proliferative signaling of human high-grade gliomas seems to utilize p21-Ras-mediated signal transduction, the concept of using p21-Ras pathway inhibition, whether by prenylation blockade or by other pharmacological approaches, as an adjuvant or single therapy appears to be attractive. POH intranasal administration is safe, noninvasive, and low-cost and regression of tumor size in some patients is suggestive of antitumor activity. However, it should also be taken into account that human tumors often contain multiple oncogenic mutations at the time of diagnosis. These may occur in upstream signaling elements such as the EGF receptor and Ras and/or in downstream elements such as Raf-1, the MAPK cascade. In addition, neoplastic cells can activate various alternative signaling routes upon blockage of Ras. Therefore it may be too much to expect that Ras therapies alone can be successful against high-grade malignant gliomas in the clinic. Perhaps such therapies may be studied in combination with other treatment modalities such as VEGF, mTOR, PDGFR, and EGFR inhibitors. In this regard the interaction of neoplastic cells with the peritumoral stroma can also result in the disruption of tissue homeostasis. Tumor burden frequently results in the recruitment of leukocytes to the tumor site (through cytokines and chemokines), which leads to an inflammatory reaction. Such approaches may help further refine our understanding of the biology and biochemistry of brain tumors, enabling us to develop new therapeutic opportunities against this disease.