Literature DB >> 18726066

A "self adhering" prosthesis for hernia repair: experimental study.

G Champault1, C Polliand, F Dufour, M Ziol, L Behr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic reinforcement is now routine in the management of inguinal and incisional hernia, and it significantly reduces the risk of recurrence. After surgery, chronic pain is often attributed to the characteristics of the mesh and to the method of fixation in the wound, with a potential risk of nerve or muscle injuries. AIM: To evaluate the properties of a new "self adhering" prosthesis in an experimental animal study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The self adhering prosthesis, a lightweight (40 mg/m(2)) polypropylene mesh coated with a synthetic glue on one side, was implanted laparoscopically in pigs. Removal of the prosthesis was performed at one day, one week and one month post operatively. A macroscopic and microscopic evaluation was performed. The results, using a quantitative score, were compared to those of a control group using the same polypropylene mesh without glue, but fixed by staples.
RESULTS: The operative time was significantly lower in the self adhering group: 23 min (15-32) versus 31 min (21-40) (P = 0.01). The average time interval from the introduction of the mesh into the preperitoneal space until the appearance of the first tough adhesion was 3 min (2-4). In the control group, the mesh handling time was 8.3 min (5-14) (P = 0.01). At the time of implantation, the score was at a maximum value in all cases for the self adhering prostheses, especially concerning handling and adhesiveness. Upon removal, this score was noted to be good or very good in 90-100% of the cases. There was a good integration in the muscle confirmed histologically, and there was no shrinkage, no mobilisation and no migration. At one month, the thickness of the fibrosis at the limits of the meshes was significantly higher for the self adhering prostheses (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: In this experimental study, the self adhering prosthesis demonstrated its adhesive properties and its ability to be well tolerated, with a good macroscopic and microscopic integration into the abdominal wound. This should allow us to perform a clinical prospective study in an open and laparoscopic approach with the double objective of reducing post operative pain induced by mechanical fixation and decreasing the cost of these procedures by reducing the operative time and by eliminating staple fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18726066     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-008-0419-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  11 in total

1.  Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials and laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  A J Aldridge; D Nehra
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  W Silen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Use of human fibrin glue (Tissucol) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Federico Lovisetto; Sandro Zonta; Emanuela Rota; Massimiliano Mazzilli; Marco Bardone; Luca Bottero; Giuseppe Faillace; Mauro Longoni
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Pain and functional impairment 6 years after inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  E K Aasvang; M Bay-Nielsen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Less chronic pain following mesh fixation using a fibrin sealant in TEP inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  R Schwab; A Willms; A Kröger; H P Becker
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Incisional hernia repair in Sweden 2002.

Authors:  L A Israelsson; S Smedberg; A Montgomery; P Nordin; L Spangen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Quantification of pain in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernioplasty identifies marked differences between prosthesis fixation systems.

Authors:  Stefano Olmi; Alberto Scaini; Luigi Erba; Marcello Guaglio; Enrico Croce
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Comparing fibrin sealant with staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal hernia repair: a case control-study.

Authors:  Graziano Ceccarelli; Luciano Casciola; Massimo Codacci Pisanelli; Alberto Bartoli; Lelio Di Zitti; Alessandro Spaziani; Alessia Biancafarina; Massimo Stefanoni; Alberto Patriti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia.

Authors:  S Kumar; R G Wilson; S J Nixon; I M C Macintyre
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Cyanoacrylate tissue sealant impairs tissue integration of macroporous mesh in experimental hernia repair.

Authors:  R H Fortelny; A H Petter-Puchner; N Walder; R Mittermayr; W Ohlinger; A Heinze; H Redl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 3.453

View more
  12 in total

1.  Randomised clinical trial: conventional Lichtenstein vs. hernioplasty with self-adhesive mesh in bilateral inguinal hernia surgery.

Authors:  Jose L Porrero; María J Castillo; Ana Pérez-Zapata; María T Alonso; Oscar Cano-Valderrama; Esther Quirós; Sol Villar; Beatriz Ramos; Carlos Sánchez-Cabezudo; Oscar Bonachia; Alberto Marcos; Brígido Pérez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Comment to "A comparison of Progrip® and Adhesix® self-adhering hernia meshes in an onlay model in the rat" Gruber-Blum S, Riepl N, Brand J, Keibl C, Redl H, Fortelny RH, Petter-Puchner AH (doi:10.1007/s10029-014-1258-0).

Authors:  M Tabbara; C Barrat
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  A self-adhering mesh for inguinal hernia repair: preliminary results of a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  G Champault; A Torcivia; L Paolino; W Chaddad; F Lacaine; C Barrat
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  A prospective comparative study of the efficacy of conventional Lichtenstein versus self-adhesive mesh repair for inguinal hernia.

Authors:  A Ziya Anadol; Murat Akin; Osman Kurukahvecioglu; Ekmel Tezel; Emin Ersoy
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  A comparison of Progrip(®) and Adhesix (®) self-adhering hernia meshes in an onlay model in the rat.

Authors:  S Gruber-Blum; N Riepl; J Brand; C Keibl; H Redl; R H Fortelny; A H Petter-Puchner
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 6.  A systematic review of randomised control trials assessing mesh fixation in open inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  D L Sanders; S Waydia
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair using a novel self-adhesive mesh.

Authors:  Nik Kosai; Paul Anthony Sutton; Jonathan Evans; Joseph Varghese
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 8.  Innovation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Reparation - Initial Experiences with the Parietex Progrip Laparoscopic(™) - Mesh.

Authors:  Pavol Klobusicky; Peter Feyerherd
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-06-25

9.  Usage of a self-adhesive mesh in TAPP hernia repair: A prospective study based on Herniamed Register.

Authors:  Pavol Klobusicky; Peter Feyerherd
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 10.  Polymer Hernia Repair Materials: Adapting to Patient Needs and Surgical Techniques.

Authors:  Marta Rodríguez; Verónica Gómez-Gil; Bárbara Pérez-Köhler; Gemma Pascual; Juan Manuel Bellón
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.