Literature DB >> 18725661

Proximal femoral nail failures in extracapsular fractures of the hip.

M S G Ballal1, N Emms, G Thomas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review patients with proximal femoral nails (PFNs) in our hospital that developed complications and needed revision.
METHODS: Between January 2000 and June 2006, records of 216 patients with PFN fixations for traumatic extracapsular trochanteric fractures (n=160), pathological fractures (n=23), and as a prophylactic measure for metastasis (n=33) were retrospectively reviewed. The injury mechanism, reduction technique and quality, and time to and cause of implant failure were recorded.
RESULTS: 12 PFNs failed: 8 in the trauma group, 3 in the pathological group, and one in the prophylactic nailing group. Two PFNs broke at the proximal lag screw level at a later stage secondary to non-union of the pathological fractures. One broke at the level of the distal locking screw at an early stage, as the locking holes were too close to the fracture.
CONCLUSION: Poorly reduced fractures tend to fail early, whereas late failures are due to non-union. Good reduction with minimal dissection, the use of appropriate nail length, and proper positioning of the nail and screws are necessary to avoid failure or revision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18725661     DOI: 10.1177/230949900801600203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)        ISSN: 1022-5536            Impact factor:   1.118


  8 in total

1.  Breakage of the Tail Portion of the Lag Screw during Removal of Proximal Femoral Zimmer Natural Nail: Report of Two Cases with Technical Notes.

Authors:  Asep Santoso; Ik-Sun Choi; Kyung-Soon Park; Taek-Rim Yoon
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2017-09-06

2.  Proximal femoral nailing is superior to hemiarthroplasty in AO/OTA A2 and A3 intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Prasoon Kumar; Rajesh Kumar Rajnish; Siddhartha Sharma; Mandeep Singh Dhillon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Comparing two intramedullary devices for treating trochanteric fractures: a prospective study.

Authors:  Konstantinos G Makridis; Vasileios Georgaklis; Miltiadis Georgoussis; Vasileios Mandalos; Vasileios Kontogeorgakos; Leonidas Badras
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Is a Cephalomedullary Nail Durable Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Peritrochanteric Disease?

Authors:  David H Chafey; Valerae O Lewis; Robert L Satcher; Bryan S Moon; Patrick P Lin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Role of Provisional Fixation of Fracture Fragments By Steinmann-Pin and Technical Tips in Proximal Femoral Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture.

Authors:  Mohit J Jain; Kinjal J Mavani; Dhaval Patel
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-06-01

6.  A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: A study on synthetic bones.

Authors:  Korhan Ozkan; İsmail Türkmen; Adem Sahin; Yavuz Yildiz; Selim Erturk; Mehmet Salih Soylemez
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  Effective Treatment for Breakage of a Solid Long Cementless Stem with a Distal Locking Screw: A Case Report.

Authors:  Shun Igarashi; Hiroaki Kijima; Shin Yamada; Yosuke Iwamoto; Masashi Fujii; Naohisa Miyakoshi
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2021-11

8.  [Treatment of AO/OTA type 31-A3 intertrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail antirotation combined with mini plate reconstruction of lateral femoral wall].

Authors:  Yao Li; Chuanzhen Hu; Lingzhou Mao; Yuchang Zhu; Xinyu Cai
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-10-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.