Literature DB >> 18725424

The roles of physiological and subjective stress in the effectiveness of a placebo on experimentally induced pain.

Per M Aslaksen1, Magne Arve Flaten.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether reduction of negative emotions and associated autonomic activity could explain placebo analgesia, and to test the effect of experimenter gender on the placebo analgesic response.
METHODS: Sixty-three (n = 32 females) students participated in a within-subjects design where subjects were tested on two separate days, one day for the experimental condition (placebo) and one day for the natural history condition. In the experimental condition, the participants received capsules containing lactose with information that the capsules were a high dose of a potent painkiller. In the natural history condition, the procedures were identical except that the placebo capsules were not administrated. The experimenters were blinded to the fact that all participants received placebo. Pain was induced by a thermode holding +46 degrees C with duration of 240 seconds to the forearm. Electrocardiogram was measured to obtain data for analysis of heart rate variability. Subjective measurements consisted of pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, stress, arousal, and mood.
RESULTS: The results showed a placebo effect on pain intensity and a concomitant reduction in subjective stress and cardiac activity. Stepwise regressions revealed that reduced subjective stress was the only predictor for the placebo analgesic response. Contrary to our hypothesis, male subjects displayed increased placebo analgesia when a male acted as experimenter.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that reduced negative emotional activation could be a mechanism in placebo analgesia and that experimenter gender is probably not systematically related to placebo analgesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18725424     DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31818105ed

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosom Med        ISSN: 0033-3174            Impact factor:   4.312


  28 in total

Review 1.  The placebo effect: advances from different methodological approaches.

Authors:  Karin Meissner; Ulrike Bingel; Luana Colloca; Tor D Wager; Alison Watson; Magne Arve Flaten
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Classical conditioning of antidepressant placebo effects in mice.

Authors:  Samuel R Krimmel; Panos Zanos; Polymnia Georgiou; Luana Colloca; Todd D Gould
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Predicting individual differences in placebo analgesia: contributions of brain activity during anticipation and pain experience.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Lauren Y Atlas; Lauren A Leotti; James K Rilling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  The relation of emotions to placebo responses.

Authors:  Magne Arve Flaten; Per M Aslaksen; Peter S Lyby; Espen Bjørkedal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  What's in a word? How instructions, suggestions, and social information change pain and emotion.

Authors:  Leonie Koban; Marieke Jepma; Stephan Geuter; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  The effect of expectation on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to suppress food craving and eating in individuals with overweight and obesity.

Authors:  Mary Katherine Ray; Maria D Sylvester; Alexis Helton; Bethany R Pittman; Laura E Wagstaff; Tommy R McRae; Bulent Turan; Kevin R Fontaine; Franklin R Amthor; Mary M Boggiano
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Pain modulation by your partner: An experimental investigation from a social-affective perspective.

Authors:  Katrin Hillmer; Judith Kappesser; Christiane Hermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on experimentally induced heat pain.

Authors:  Per M Aslaksen; Olena Vasylenko; Asbjørn J Fagerlund
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Pharmacogenomics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: interaction with biological differences between men and women.

Authors:  Flavia Franconi; Ilaria Campesi
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 10.  Autonomic arousal and experimentally induced pain: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Brandon Nicholas Kyle; Daniel W McNeil
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.