Literature DB >> 18722682

Does a targeting ligand influence nanoparticle tumor localization or uptake?

Kathleen F Pirollo1, Esther H Chang.   

Abstract

Inclusion of a tumor-targeting molecule in nanosized delivery systems increases their in vivo efficacy. However, the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of the uptake of such particles have not yet been well addressed. Several recent papers have suggested that tumor-targeting ligands function primarily to increase intracellular uptake of the nanocomplex and do not influence tumor localization. However, other reports indicate that they do play a role in the accumulation in the tumor. One difference might be the presence or absence of poly-[ethylene glycol] (PEG) in the complex and its impact on the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Further studies are clearly needed to more fully elucidate the influence of composition on tumor-targeted, systemic delivery of nanoparticles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18722682     DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Biotechnol        ISSN: 0167-7799            Impact factor:   19.536


  88 in total

1.  Layer-by-layer nanoparticles with a pH-sheddable layer for in vivo targeting of tumor hypoxia.

Authors:  Zhiyong Poon; Dongsook Chang; Xiaoyong Zhao; Paula T Hammond
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 2.  Targeted polymeric therapeutic nanoparticles: design, development and clinical translation.

Authors:  Nazila Kamaly; Zeyu Xiao; Pedro M Valencia; Aleksandar F Radovic-Moreno; Omid C Farokhzad
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  Chlorotoxin labeled magnetic nanovectors for targeted gene delivery to glioma.

Authors:  Forrest M Kievit; Omid Veiseh; Chen Fang; Narayan Bhattarai; Donghoon Lee; Richard G Ellenbogen; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  Nanotechnology in drug delivery and tissue engineering: from discovery to applications.

Authors:  Jinjun Shi; Alexander R Votruba; Omid C Farokhzad; Robert Langer
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  Multifunctional mesoporous silica nanospheres with cleavable Gd(III) chelates as MRI contrast agents: synthesis, characterization, target-specificity, and renal clearance.

Authors:  Juan L Vivero-Escoto; Kathryn M L Taylor-Pashow; Rachel C Huxford; Joseph Della Rocca; Christie Okoruwa; Hongyu An; Weili Lin; Wenbin Lin
Journal:  Small       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 13.281

6.  Accumulation of nano-sized particles in a murine model of angiogenesis.

Authors:  Thomas R Wittenborn; Esben K U Larsen; Thomas Nielsen; Louise M Rydtoft; Line Hansen; Jens V Nygaard; Thomas Vorup-Jensen; Jørgen Kjems; Michael R Horsman; Niels Chr Nielsen
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 7.  Nanoplatforms for Targeted Stimuli-Responsive Drug Delivery: A Review of Platform Materials and Stimuli-Responsive Release and Targeting Mechanisms.

Authors:  Yuzhe Sun; Edward Davis
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 5.076

8.  Facile synthesis of multivalent folate-block copolymer conjugates via aqueous RAFT polymerization: targeted delivery of siRNA and subsequent gene suppression.

Authors:  Adam W York; Yilin Zhang; Andrew C Holley; Yanlin Guo; Faqing Huang; Charles L McCormick
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 6.988

9.  Odyssey of a cancer nanoparticle: from injection site to site of action.

Authors:  Joseph W Nichols; You Han Bae
Journal:  Nano Today       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 20.722

Review 10.  Challenges to effective cancer nanotheranostics.

Authors:  Marites P Melancon; R Jason Stafford; Chun Li
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.