Literature DB >> 18722132

Clinical implication and prognostic significance of standardised uptake value of primary non-small cell lung cancer on positron emission tomography: analysis of 176 cases.

Nael Al-Sarraf1, Kathy Gately, Julie Lucey, Rashid Aziz, Kishore Doddakula, Lorraine Wilson, Eillish McGovern, Vincent Young.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the clinical implication and prognostic significance of maximum standardised uptake value (SUV(max)) of primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) staged by integrated PET-CT.
METHODS: A retrospective review was carried out on 176 consecutive patients with histologically proven NSCLC who underwent staging with integrated PET-CT prior to curative intent surgical resection. SUV(max) of primary NSCLC were measured and correlated with tumour characteristics, lymph node involvement, surgical stage, type of surgical resection and survival following resection.
RESULTS: SUV(max) was significantly higher in centrally located tumours, tumours > or =4.0 cm, squamous cell subtype, poorly differentiated tumours, advanced T stage, advanced nodal stage, pleural invasion, and patients requiring complex surgical resection. SUV(max) value of 15 was the best discriminative cut-off value for survival generated by log-rank test. When patients were stratified based on this value, those with SUV(max) >15 were more likely to have centrally located tumours, squamous cell subtype, advanced T stage, advanced nodal stage, advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, larger tumour size and required more advanced surgical resections than a simple lobectomy. Overall survival was significantly longer for patients with SUV(max) < or =15 than those with SUV(max) >15. Furthermore, nodal stage specific survival following resection (i.e. non-N2 and N2) were significantly better in patients with SUV(max) < or =15 than SUV(max) >15.
CONCLUSION: SUV(max) correlates with tumour characteristics, surgical stage and prognosis following resection. SUV(max) may be a useful preoperative tool, in addition to other known prognostic markers, in allocating patients with potentially poor prognosis preoperatively to neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection in order to improve their overall survival. Prospective and randomised trials are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18722132     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.07.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  27 in total

1.  FDG-PET SUVmax combined with IASLC/ATS/ERS histologic classification improves the prognostic stratification of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kyuichi Kadota; Christos Colovos; Kei Suzuki; Nabil P Rizk; Mark P S Dunphy; Emily C Zabor; Camelia S Sima; Akihiko Yoshizawa; William D Travis; Valerie W Rusch; Prasad S Adusumilli
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Variations in positron emission tomography-computed tomography findings for patients receiving neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jae Kil Park; Jae Jun Kim; Seok Whan Moon
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Survival Prognostic Value of Morphological and Metabolic variables in Patients with Stage I and II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  L Domachevsky; D Groshar; R Galili; M Saute; H Bernstine
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Risk factors associated with recurrence of surgically resected node-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yoichi Ohtaki; Kimihiro Shimizu; Kyoichi Kaira; Toshiteru Nagashima; Kai Obayashi; Seshiru Nakazawa; Seiichi Kakegawa; Hitoshi Igai; Mitsuhiro Kamiyoshihara; Masahiko Nishiyama; Izumi Takeyoshi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and demographic, clinical, pathological, radiological factors in lung cancer.

Authors:  Aysel Sunnetcioglu; Ahmet Arısoy; Yusuf Demir; Selami Ekin; Erkan Dogan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

Review 6.  Recent Trends in PET Image Interpretations Using Volumetric and Texture-based Quantification Methods in Nuclear Oncology.

Authors:  Muhammad Kashif Rahim; Sung Eun Kim; Hyeongryul So; Hyung Jun Kim; Gi Jeong Cheon; Eun Seong Lee; Keon Wook Kang; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-01-22

7.  ¹⁸F-FDG uptake as a prognostic variable in primary differentiated thyroid cancer incidentally detected by PET/CT: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Arnoldo Piccardo; Matteo Puntoni; Francesco Bertagna; Giorgio Treglia; Luca Foppiani; Federico Arecco; Raffaele Giubbini; Mehrdad Naseri; Angelina Cistaro; Manlio Cabria; Francesca Bardesono; Luca Ceriani; Fabio Orlandi; Luca Giovanella
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Primary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma of the Lung: Radiometabolic ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) Findings and Correlation with Clinico-Pathological and Survival Results.

Authors:  Cristian Rapicetta; Filippo Lococo; Alessandro Stefani; Giulio Rossi; Tommaso Ricchetti; Angelina Filice; Antonella Franceschetto; Giorgio Treglia; Massimiliano Paci
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.584

9.  FDG PET-CT SUVmax and IASLC/ATS/ERS histologic classification: a new profile of lung adenocarcinoma with prognostic value.

Authors:  Marina Suárez-Piñera; José Belda-Sanchis; Alvaro Taus; Albert Sánchez-Font; Antoni Mestre-Fusco; Marcel Jiménez; Lara Pijuan
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-04-25

10.  FDG PET-CT aids in the preoperative assessment of patients with newly diagnosed thymic epithelial malignancies.

Authors:  Marcelo F K Benveniste; Cesar A Moran; Osama Mawlawi; Patricia S Fox; Stephen G Swisher; Reginald F Munden; Edith M Marom
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 15.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.