Literature DB >> 18721897

Mutagenicity of native cigarette mainstream smoke and its gas/vapour phase by use of different tester strains and cigarettes in a modified Ames assay.

Michaela Aufderheide1, Helga Gressmann.   

Abstract

The "Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay" is generally accepted to analyse the genotoxic capacity of single compounds or complex mixtures such as cigarette-smoke condensates. With an adapted and modified Ames assay, the mutagenicity of native cigarette mainstream whole smoke (WS) and its gas/vapour phase (GVP) was studied. The bacteria were directly exposed to the smoke in a CULTEX1 system closely connected to a smoking robot (VC10). A variety of standard tester strains (TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA102, WP2uvrApKM101) and descendants of TA98 (YG1021, YG1024, YG1041) and TA100 (YG1026, YG1029 and YG1042) were exposed to whole and filtered smoke of the research cigarette K2R4F to find the most sensitive strains for analysing the mutagenic activity of these test atmospheres. Mutagenicity of WS was detected by TA98, TA100 and their YG descendant strains as well as by WP2uvrApKM101 in the presence of S9 mix. The GVP induced a mutagenic signal in TA100, YG1029 and YG1042 and WP2uvrApKM101 only in the absence of S9 mix. To detect mutagenicity in WS the presence of the plasmid pKM101 is required and a frame-shift mutation is more effective than a missense mutation. To detect mutagenicity in GVP, the presence of the plasmid pKM101 and a missense mutation are required. The differentiating capacity of this modified Ames assay was demonstrated by exposing strain TA98 to WS and TA100 to the GVP of cigarettes with different tar content. The mutagenic activity of WS and the GVP increased with rising tar content of the cigarettes with two exceptions in WS. Thus, the concept of tar content alone is misleading and does not reflect the mutagenic activity of a cigarette.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18721897     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of an Air Quality Health Index for Predicting the Mutagenicity of Simulated Atmospheres.

Authors:  Jose Zavala; Jonathan D Krug; Sarah H Warren; Q Todd Krantz; Charly King; John McKee; Stephen H Gavett; Michael Lewandowski; William A Lonneman; Tadeusz E Kleindienst; Matthew J Meier; Mark Higuchi; M Ian Gilmour; David M DeMarini
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  Evaluation of in vitro assays for assessing the toxicity of cigarette smoke and smokeless tobacco.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; Jodi Schilz; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Jerry R Rice; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Comparative Genotoxicity and Mutagenicity of Cigarette, Cigarillo, and Shisha Tobacco Products in Epithelial and Cardiac Cells.

Authors:  Carmen S Tellez; Daniel E Juri; Loryn M Phillips; Kieu Do; Cindy L Thomas; Randy Willink; Wendy W Dye; Guodong Wu; Yue Zhou; Hammad Irshad; Shosei Kishida; Tohru Kiyono; Steven A Belinsky
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.109

4.  Hyaluronan and layilin mediate loss of airway epithelial barrier function induced by cigarette smoke by decreasing E-cadherin.

Authors:  Rosanna Malbran Forteza; S Marina Casalino-Matsuda; Nieves S Falcon; Monica Valencia Gattas; Maria E Monzon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Comparative potency analysis of whole smoke solutions in the bacterial reverse mutation test.

Authors:  Fanxue Meng; Nan Mei; Jian Yan; Xiaoqing Guo; Patricia A Richter; Tao Chen; Mamata De
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Analytical in vitro approach for studying cyto- and genotoxic effects of particulate airborne material.

Authors:  Michaela Aufderheide; Stefanie Scheffler; Niklas Möhle; Beat Halter; Dieter Hochrainer
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.142

7.  Characterisation of a Vitrocell® VC 10 in vitro smoke exposure system using dose tools and biological analysis.

Authors:  David Thorne; Joanne Kilford; Rebecca Payne; Jason Adamson; Ken Scott; Annette Dalrymple; Clive Meredith; Deborah Dillon
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.215

8.  Comparative tumor promotion assessment of e-cigarette and cigarettes using the in vitro Bhas 42 cell transformation assay.

Authors:  Damien Breheny; Oluwatobiloba Oke; Kamala Pant; Marianna Gaça
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Development, qualification, validation and application of the Ames test using a VITROCELL® VC10® smoke exposure system.

Authors:  Kathy Fowler; Wanda Fields; Victoria Hargreaves; Lesley Reeve; Betsy Bombick
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2018-04-12

10.  In vitro mutagenicity of gas-vapour phase extracts from flavoured and unflavoured heated tobacco products.

Authors:  Theo Le Godec; Ian Crooks; Ken Scott; Clive Meredith
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2019-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.