Literature DB >> 18721823

The effects of food viscosity on bite size, bite effort and food intake.

R A de Wijk1, N Zijlstra, M Mars, C de Graaf, J F Prinz.   

Abstract

Two studies investigated the effect of a food's viscosity on bite size, bite effort and food intake using a standardized protocol in which subjects sipped through a straw every 20 s for a period of 15 min from one of two products, a chocolate-flavored dairy drink and a chocolate-flavored dairy semi-solid, matched for energy density. In the first study, subjects consumed 47% more from the liquid than from the semi-solid to reach the same degree of satiation, with larger bite sizes for the liquid throughout the 15 minute period (8.7+/-0.45 g) compared to the semi-solid (5.8+/-0.3 g, p<0.01). In the second study bite effort was eliminated by using a peristaltic pump to present the products every 20 s. Oral processing time before swallowing was set at 5 s (both products) or 8 s (semi-solid). With the elimination of bite effort and a standardized oral processing time, subjects consumed as much from the semi-solid as from the liquid to reach the same degree of satiation. Bite size for liquids started relatively small and grew gradually over successive bites, whereas the bite size for the semi-solid food started relatively large and became gradually smaller. The latter effect was even more pronounced when the oral processing time was increased from 5 to 8 s. In conclusion, semi-solids resulted in smaller bite sizes and lower intake than liquids, but these differences disappeared when differences in bite effort were eliminated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18721823     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  24 in total

Review 1.  Slow food, fast food and the control of food intake.

Authors:  Cees de Graaf; Frans J Kok
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Effects of food diameter on bite size per mouthful and chewing behavior.

Authors:  Kouichi Shiozawa; Yoshiki Ohnuki; Yasumasa Mototani; Daisuke Umeki; Aiko Ito; Yasutake Saeki; Nobuhiro Hanada; Satoshi Okumura
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.781

3.  Effects of learning and food form on energy intake and appetitive responses.

Authors:  Joshua B Jones; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-06-21

4.  The role of digestive factors in determining glycemic response in a multiethnic Asian population.

Authors:  Verena Ming Hui Tan; Delicia Shu Qin Ooi; Jeevesh Kapur; Ting Wu; Yiong Huak Chan; Christiani Jeyakumar Henry; Yung Seng Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.614

5.  Relationship between bite size per mouthful and dental arch size in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Kouichi Shiozawa; Yasumasa Mototani; Kenji Suita; Aiko Ito; Naoya Kawamura; Yuka Yagisawa; Ichiro Matsuo; Yoshio Hayakawa; Megumi Nariyama; Daisuke Umeki; Yasutake Saeki; Yoshiki Ohnuki; Satoshi Okumura
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 2.781

6.  Oral processing effort, appetite and acute energy intake in lean and obese adults.

Authors:  Richard D Mattes; Robert V Considine
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2013-08-15

7.  The effect of agar jelly on energy expenditure, appetite, gastric emptying and glycaemic response.

Authors:  Miriam E Clegg; Amir Shafat
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 5.614

8.  Escalation of food-maintained responding and sensitivity to the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine in mice.

Authors:  James E Goeders; Kevin S Murnane; Matthew L Banks; William E Fantegrossi
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  A comparison of bite size and BMI in a cafeteria setting.

Authors:  Ryan S Mattfeld; Eric R Muth; Adam Hoover
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-09-08

10.  The impact of food viscosity on eating rate, subjective appetite, glycemic response and gastric emptying rate.

Authors:  Yong Zhu; Walter H Hsu; James H Hollis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.