| Literature DB >> 18719769 |
Siti Fatimah Ibrahim1, Khairul Osman, Srijit Das, Abas Mazni Othman, Norzaiti Abdul Majid, Mohd Padzil Abdul Rahman.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Assisted reproductive techniques are useful in helping infertile couples achieve successful conception. Initial studies have shown that sperm cryopreservation, one step in assisted reproduction, causes a dramatic reduction in sperm quality. This has been attributed to, among other things, free radical activities. The aim of the present study was to minimize this oxidative attack by adding an antioxidant into the sperm microenvironment. Alpha lipoic acids were selected for this purpose for their efficient free radical scavenging properties and solubility in lipid and aqueous phases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18719769 PMCID: PMC2664134 DOI: 10.1590/s1807-59322008000400022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Sperm motility grading in this study compared to WHO (1999) recommendation
| Parameter Density | Values | WHO (1999) criterion |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Grade A | 26.40 ± 1.75 % | 50% of forward movements (Grade A & B) or 25% or more Grade A for- ward movement within 60 minutes of ejaculations |
| 2. Grade B | 41.99 ± 1.98 % | |
| 3. Grade C | 18.25 ± 0.65 % | |
| 4. Grade D | 13.35 ± 0.15 % | |
| Motility | 2.99 ± 0.49 um/sec or 68.40 ± 0.53% | More than 8 um/sec or more than50% motile |
| Viability | 86.53 ± 0.11% | More than 75% viable |
The grading was done using Weber Sterility chamber under light microscope. Grade A – fast progressive movement; Grade B – slow progressive movement; Grade C – non – progressive movement; Grade D – immotile;
motility percentage = Grade A + Grade B;
viability percentage = Grade A + Grade B + Grade C.
Figure 1Dose response curve of ALA against sperm motility. Sperm motility was assessed using light microscope with Mtrack J Imaging System on the Weber sterility chamber. Mann-Whitney t-test was used to determine the differences between baseline (pre) and after one-hour incubation (post). r2 = 0.0649 *P<0.05. N=31
Figure 2Dose response curve of ALA against sperm vitality. Sperm vitality was assessed using light microscope with Mtrack J Imaging System on the Weber sterility chamber. Mann-Whitney t-test was used to determine the differences between baseline (pre) and after one-hour incubation (post). There is no significant differences between pre and post treatment (P>0.05). r2 = 0.9156 N=31
Figure 3Percentage of tail DNA (N=31) against a range of ALA concentration (0, 0.00625, 0.0125, 0.025, 0.05 and 0.1mmol/ml). Percentage of tail DNA was done using Comet assay imaging software (CASP version 2). Kruskal Wallis ANOVA was used to determine significant differences between ALA concentrations and percentage of DNA tail. There is a significant differences between the range of concentration compared to control group. *P<0.05