| Literature DB >> 32681619 |
Hamid Ekrami1,2, Mansoureh Movahedin3, Fereshteh Koosha4, Zohreh Mazaheri2, Manijhe Mokhtari-Dizaji5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the impact of Calligonum extract and US radiation on sperm parameters of cryopreserved human semen samples.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidants; Calligonum; Cryopreservation; Low-Intensity Ultrasound; Spermatozoa
Year: 2020 PMID: 32681619 PMCID: PMC7382682 DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2020.5896
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Fertil Steril ISSN: 2008-0778
The demography of semen samples
| Characteristics | Average | SD |
|---|---|---|
| Age (Y) | 34 | 3.041 |
| Total motility (%) | 80.7795 | 1.69 |
| Grade A (%) | 33.1496 | 1.74 |
| Grade B (%) | 30.7443 | 1.56 |
| Grade C (%) | 16.8856 | 1.39 |
| Grade D (%) | 19.4599 | 1.58 |
| Grade A+B (%) | 64.0651 | 2.08 |
| Viability (%) | 87 | 1.27 |
| Normal morphology (%) | 28.6397 | 4.26 |
| SDF (%) | 10.63 | 2.15 |
| ROS (%) | 11.0804 | 2.16 |
Grade A; Linear progressive motility, Grade B; Progressive motility, Grade C; Non-progressive motility, Grade D; Immotile, SDF; Sperm DNA fragmentation, ROS; Reactive oxygen species, and SD; Standard Diviation.
Comparison of sperm parameters (± SD) between the experimental groups after frozen-thawed and treatment with 10 μg/ml Calligonum (CGM) extract and LIPUS (pulsed mode and continues wave)
| GroupsSperm parameters | Control | Frozen -thawed | Frozenthawed+CGMextract | Frozenthawed+continueswave of ultrasound | Frozenthawed+continueswave oftrasound+CGMextract | Frozenthawed+pulsedmode ofultrasound | Frozenthawed+pulsedmode of ultrasound +CGMextract |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viability (%) | 94.17c ± 5.97 | 87.52 ± 4.75 | 90.11 ± 6.12 | 82.76b ± 5.68 | 86.70 ± 7.12 | 81.82b ± 2.87 | 87.94 ± 4.25 |
| Total motility(%) | 89.37 ± 3.74 | 81.30 ± 3.74 | 85.42 ± 4.28 | 76.76ab ± 5.29 | 81.65 ± 5.18 | 75.86ab ± 3.47 | 81.90 ± 3.93 |
| Progressivemotility (%) | 38.80 ± 2.57 | 34.81a ± 3.28 | 37.81 ± 4.13 | 33.04ab ± 2.98 | 37.24 ± 5.11 | 32.60ab ± 3.58 | 36.18a ± 4.78 |
| Normalmorphology (%) | 30.11 ± 3.16 | 26.58 ± 3.54 | 28.41 ± 4.27 | 27.58 ± 3.95 | 30.82 ± 2.75 | 28.35 ± 4.82 | 30.05 ± 3.66 |
a; Significant difference with control group in the same row (P≤0.05), b; Significant difference with freeze and thawed group + CGM extract, in the same row P≤0.026, and c; Significant difference with other groups in the same row (P≤0.047).
Assessment of fragmented DNA and free radicals percentage in all experimental groups
| Groups | Control | Frozen- thawed | Frozen- thawed +CGM extract | Frozen- thawed +continues wave ofultrasound | Frozen- thawed +continues wave ofultrasound+CGMextract | Frozen- thawed +pulsed mode ofultrasound | Frozen- thawed +pulsed mode ofultrasound+CGMextract |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fragmented DNA(%) ± SD | 24.5 ± 7.23 | 46.5a ± 9.26 | 37 ± 4.29 | 38 ± 5.37 | 34 ± 5.17 | 51a ± 11.85 | 42.5a ± 7.39 |
| Freeradicals(ROS)(%) ± SD | - | 12.46 ± 7.06 | 9.18 ± 2.57 | 12.52 ± 8.14 | 7.77 ± 2.06 | 14.75 ± 4.67 | 10.05 ± 1.68 |
CGM; Calligonum extract, ROS; Reactive oxygen species, and a; significant difference with control group in the same row (P≤0.042).